Recently the creator of Pixelfed, Dansup, went live with this

respectfulplatforms.org

It has sections for 'safeguards against hate speech' and 'strong protections for vulnerable communities'.

Also recently, & a bunch of times in the past, Dansup has used AAVE (commonwealthtimes.org/2021/02/…) in posts (despite being asked several times, including by Black folk, to please stop appropriating AAVE), posted transmisic comments, then deleted them and blamed it on being drunk.

Receipts in the next toot.

This entry was edited (11 months ago)
in reply to Calligrafae

Transphobia: ghostarchive.org/archive/TeahB

AAVE:

h-i.social/@poisonous/11374281…

ghostarchive.org/archive/i7Rt6
(here's the post Dan links to defending his use of 'y'all', when if you scroll down, you'll see Tobi explaining that 'y'all' wasn't the problem: archive.is/6bhhZ )

archive.is/JT3Fu

archive.is/0S8TG (posted after deleting other posts)

In late '23 Dan approached me about taking ownership of pixelfed.art and helping guide the direction of moderation tooling for Pixelfed overall -

🧵

This entry was edited (10 months ago)
in reply to Calligrafae

because mastodon.art runs with such strong moderation principles and he wanted to take that on board with Pixelfed development. I said I'd only do it if I had full say on who would be on the admin team, and told him that other than me, none of them would be white. I got a few PoC friends who said they'd be interested in helping. We had concerns that he was only doing it to do damage control on his reputation (he has a history of being problematic, a bit too hesitant on moderating hate speech) 🧵
in reply to Calligrafae

but if it meant we could help guide Pixelfed more towards prioritising community safety for marginalised people, we'd work with him. I told him in no uncertain terms that if he did ANYTHING that we disagreed with, we'd bail immediately. He assured me he was fine with all of this and said repeatedly how eager he was for us to get involved and take over pixelfed.art.

Several months later, crickets from him, and I guess he just carried on doing his own thing and wasn't really that enthusiastic 🧵

in reply to Calligrafae

More examples of him using AAVE:

mastodon.social/@dansup/113379… (archive.is/8Ycdv)

mastodon.social/@dansup/113396… (archive.is/XwGyY)


This is our cat Tuk, he's been sick the past few days and hasn't been able to keep any food down.

We took him to the vet today, and it turns out he was only dehydrated. I recently moved his water fountain, and didn't realize he stopped drinking from it.

It's moved back, and he's fine now!!

Why are cats like this??

He had us so worried, and for us to spend over $200 for the vet to say: "he a thirsty bitch" is like wow... wow, and my partner wonders why I'm a dog person 😅

This entry was edited (11 months ago)
in reply to Andy P

@otterlove @simonzerafa Yall is Southern, for everyone in the SOUTH

However, until VERY recently, if you were in the North, the only ppl that said "Yall" were African Am folks, because many in CHicago, Detroit and other North cities are descendants from Southern Blk Folks that moved in the Great Migration. There is (as always) context and nuance to this. and now yall has permeated into pop culture. In the 90s, I only knew Blk folks that said in Chicago

in reply to Calligrafae

Small addition to the above, just to link this other thread I made that clarifies which bits are appropriated AAVE, and why that's bad:

mastodon.art/@welshpixie/11382…


Since *many* people are unfamiliar with what AAVE is (African-American Vernacular English, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African-…), and thus could not identify it in Dansup's posts that I linked to yesterday, here are the snippets of AAVE he used in each post;

From h-i.social/@poisonous/11374281… , quoted at the top:

'they in my mentions', 'it be kinda' . Note the missing 'are' in the first example, and 'it be' instead of 'it is'. These are strong examples of AAVE.

🧵

in reply to Cats Who Draw

Meta, Racism (?), I Recount Not All That Well

Sensitive content

in reply to neurotic_fiend_friction 🐚

Meta, Racism (?), I Recount Not All That Well

Sensitive content

in reply to Cats Who Draw

Meta, Racism (?), I Recount Not All That Well

Sensitive content

in reply to Alvar Sirlin

Meta, Racism (?), I Recount Not All That Well

Sensitive content

in reply to Trisha Lynn 🇵🇭 🇺🇸 🇨🇦

@trishalynn no, see mastodon.art/@welshpixie/11382…
in reply to Calligrafae

mastodon.art/@bluszcz/11392332… adding to the list my post about my account removal from pixel by dansup ;)


🇬🇧 It is a funny coincidence that after my several criticism of #pixelfed and posting on my pixelfed account following screenshot, some minutes later my account from pixelfed did disappear. Another proof that the service and its author are just immature as hell. And its fine, great job @welshpixie on detecting the toxic people. The thing is that the guy had to react very emotionally without even having proper mechanism in place - I am still logged to the platform but nothing works ;) Adeu.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source

Esther Payne

@monospace @ruari I fear we're repeating a lot of the mistakes we made when we gave Zuckerberg et all the benefit of the doubt on Facebook.

I see the support for some of our problematic young Devs from some of my contemporaries who possibly were at tech meetups in the 2010s. Reliving their 20s.

Where "line goes up", and we need "more people on fedi", at the expense of community safety in our networks. Where people see defederation as censorship, when it's about community safety. 🙇‍♀️

in reply to Calligrafae

I recently had a conversation with someone that said insisting on language puritanism perpetuates the oppression of the working class, which I found to be a convincing argument.

In that regard I find it interesting that you seem to be taking an opposite stance here. Forgive me, I cannot seem to find your comment, but you said something about language fluidity being used to justify this kind of behavior is wrong, because that's a colonial mindset?? Can you clarify what you mean?

in reply to Dušan Mitrović

@dusnm Essentially it's whitewashing AAVE. AAVE is culturally important to an oppressed group of people. The power balance here is that 'white/western' languages are used by people with great social privilege, while AAVE is the opposite; it's the powerful, widespread majority absorbing and diluting and eventually destroying the thing. The same reason there's no reverse racism (racism against white people); racism involves that power imbalance and white people are at the top of that power -
in reply to Calligrafae

@dusnm - pyramid; we can't be oppressed.

There's a huge difference between one widely spoken Western-European language taking loan words from another widely spoken Western-European language, both spoken by people who have been largely (if not entirely) free from oppression, and doing it to a tiny language that forms part of the heritage of a marginalised group.

There's plenty of stuff you can read about cultural appropriation if you want to self-educate. Also see h-i.social/@poisonous/11382667… .

in reply to Calligrafae

I always found it tricky to straddle the cultural appropriation line, because in some ways the line is really blurry.

Say for instance, the other day me and my coworkers decided to eat some Mexican food, almost as an afterthought, an off-handed comment. "Let's go to that Mexican place". To us it's just another variety of food, but for the people of Mexico it's literally part of their history, heritage, culture. Is it cultural appropriation to do that? Ask people from different cultures and you'll get different answers. We (from Serbia) generally really like others taking notice of our cultural customs, especially our cuisine, and we love sharing it with the world, but some other people might not think so.

Coming back to my main point, maybe you're really onto something here, maybe it's really distasteful (that I agree on) for a white man to use AAVE, especially in America, but can you really, honestly, make judgements about someone's character based solely on that fact? I don't really know the answer to that question.