US teen drug, alcohol and tobacco use continues to decline
Summary
Teen drug, alcohol, and tobacco use in the U.S. continues to decline, with record-low usage levels reported in 2023, according to the University of Michigan's Monitoring the Future survey.
Among 12th graders, 66% reported no recent use of alcohol, marijuana, cigarettes, or e-cigarettes, while 80% of 10th graders and 90% of 8th graders avoided these substances entirely.
Experts attribute the decline partly to reduced peer pressure during the pandemic.
However, nicotine pouch use has doubled among 12th graders, raising concerns.
Despite pop culture's glamorization of smoking, teen cigarette use remains low.
US teen drug, alcohol and tobacco use continues to decline
Record numbers of teens now abstain, a trend starting during the Covid pandemic and continuing to the presentMarina Dunbar (The Guardian)
like this
˜”*°• Papigoe 🏳️🌈 🏳️⚧️ 🏴 🇳🇴 reshared this.
j4k3
in reply to MicroWave • • •like this
osaerisxero likes this.
someguy3
in reply to MicroWave • • •like this
Beacon and NoneOfUrBusiness like this.
boredsquirrel
in reply to someguy3 • • •like this
NoneOfUrBusiness likes this.
jeffw
in reply to someguy3 • • •like this
NoneOfUrBusiness likes this.
Jarix
in reply to jeffw • • •Gaming is very much a social activity.
Try finding a triple A game released in the last 10 years that hasnt been heavily designed around multiplayer.
It hasnt been until indie games have really caught on, perhaps as a result of the shift towards open world multiplayer gaming that now dominates, that there is still a market for those types of games.
I know multiple married people that used gaming to connect with each other when they had to be apart.
I was actually on one of those married couples first date because they played league of legends, and that was how I even knew them.
ByteJunk
in reply to Jarix • • •What? In 2024 alone, would you say games like Alan Wake 2, Baldurs Gate 3 or Elden Ring are "heavily designed around multiplayer"?
Sure you have your FIFA's and CoD and a bunch of other MP games, but single player games are still a thing.
metallic_z3r0
in reply to ByteJunk • • •prole
in reply to metallic_z3r0 • • •desktop_user
in reply to Jarix • • •cyberpunk 2077
Jarix
in reply to desktop_user • • •Pasta Dental
in reply to Jarix • • •Jarix
in reply to Pasta Dental • • •Sorry but that's like saying social media isnt a social activity. Yes there is s variety of ways to engage with it, but it is something that is causing people to connect with others from a distance.
Its also like saying long distance relationships arent real relationships which would be a ridiculous thing to claim
Pasta Dental
in reply to Jarix • • •Jarix
in reply to Pasta Dental • • •UltraGiGaGigantic
in reply to Pasta Dental • • •If you saw the people I did throughout life, you'd want to stay in the basement as well.
Glad to hear you have met good people throughout life. Just keep in mind not everyone has thar experience.
Pasta Dental
in reply to UltraGiGaGigantic • • •Lost_My_Mind
in reply to someguy3 • • •I'm 41, and my cousin has young teens. I asked "Do kids today even play video games?"
And she said "Not in the way you would think. It's not about playstation or nintendo. It's about cell phones and tablets."
Which made me sad. App gaming is laaaaaame.
prole
in reply to Lost_My_Mind • • •desktop_user
in reply to Lost_My_Mind • • •desktops/laptops, ps5, and Xbox all use apps.
ZeffSyde
in reply to desktop_user • • •Tikiporch
in reply to desktop_user • • •AA5B
in reply to Lost_My_Mind • • •I hope that’s just your experience - being relegated to mobile games would be sad. I mean I’m addicted too but I recognize they’re just a time and attention waster.
My older teens are pretty avid gamers as are their friends. One of them started a gaming club at his school! They’re such great kids they sometimes let their Mom or me join a party, and they don’t laugh too hard. But seriously, that’s how they socialize ever since COViD. They’ll spend the entire night in a group chat, listening to music, sometimes teaming up sometimes not, just playing video games and spending time with friends. It works
scarabic
in reply to someguy3 • • •technomad
in reply to MicroWave • • •like this
slothbear likes this.
spujb
in reply to technomad • • •like this
NoneOfUrBusiness likes this.
boredsquirrel
in reply to spujb • • •spujb
in reply to boredsquirrel • • •:)
First Nations people of Australia
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)PaupersSerenade
in reply to spujb • • •Aboriginal is mostly associated with Australia, but since this is a Canadian study I thought it would be helpful to link to the tribes there.
For North Americans the term most often heard in popular usage is ‘Indigenous’
indigenous peoples within the boundaries of Canada
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)like this
NoneOfUrBusiness likes this.
spujb
in reply to PaupersSerenade • • •boredsquirrel
in reply to PaupersSerenade • • •Unforeseen
in reply to boredsquirrel • • •Because they aren't affected by government pricing, as its all tax.
So, tabacco is tax free. I used to know smokers who would go to the reservations in Ontario and come back with cartons.
ShareMySims
in reply to Unforeseen • • •boredsquirrel
in reply to Unforeseen • • •ShareMySims
in reply to boredsquirrel • • •Quite the opposite actually, and not really amusing in the slightest:
source
Decolonization of Tobacco in Indigenous Communities of Turtle Island (North America) - PMC
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govScrubbles
in reply to technomad • • •catloaf
in reply to Scrubbles • • •droporain
in reply to Scrubbles • • •Lost_My_Mind
in reply to Scrubbles • • •Man. Your citys drug dealers are so nice! And also so stupid. That's not a sustainable business model at all.
I know old people who go to the mall, do a lap around the food court, get a free sample on a toothpick of all the fast food in the food court, and call it lunch. They never actually buy any.
AA5B
in reply to Lost_My_Mind • • •BigFig
in reply to MicroWave • • •like this
SuiXi3D, NoneOfUrBusiness and massive_bereavement like this.
JBar2
in reply to BigFig • • •Huh? It's a survey
Sure, they could be lying, but why would they?
And your employee anecdotal stories mean zilch
like this
Beacon and NoneOfUrBusiness like this.
jeffw
in reply to JBar2 • • •like this
Beacon and NoneOfUrBusiness like this.
jeffw
in reply to BigFig • • •like this
Beacon and NoneOfUrBusiness like this.
prole
in reply to jeffw • • •ChexMax
in reply to jeffw • • •desktop_user
in reply to jeffw • • •because if the survey was done on school computers the students likely know/assume the computer has administrative spyware on it. I know this because when I took a similar survey to this at my school the known spyware program was still running while we took the "anonymous" survey.
No one in their right mind should trust anonymous surveys taken on computers that a known surveillance agency controls.
jeffw
in reply to MicroWave • • •So… they don’t have friends? Very uplifting
like this
NoneOfUrBusiness likes this.
kambusha
in reply to jeffw • • •jj4211
in reply to jeffw • • •Well, they have friends, but after spending about a year not seeing them in person, they are used to just meeting them online. At least anecdotally that's what I'm seeing with the kids of my group, that going out is a hassle and online is good enough. When they do, it's maybe a total of three or four people hanging out, no big parties to speak of.
On a related note, the schools I know of pretty much stopped having dances other than the prom. In fact, from what I hear, the ability for students to socialize broadly has been pretty much tanked since the pandemic (stricter schedules, no more lockers, and various other measures instituted to avoid congregating students after pandemic and those policies seem to have stuck, presumably because it makes the students a bit easier to manage. It's been a cause for concern for me about their social development, as while I never was big on those events, I at least remember a lot more downtime on school grounds that our kids don't seem to get.
Not just them, frankly we haven't really been seeing folks in person nearly as much since the pandemic. There are certain special occasions, but we almost never have a "random" visit for no particular reason anymore.
jjjalljs
in reply to MicroWave • • •On the one hand, cigarettes are bad and everyone should quit. And alcohol should be used in moderation. And many drugs are very dangerous and addictive and should be avoided. So this is probably good.
On the other hand, if this means are just sitting home alone, maybe having parasocial relationships with influencers, that's sad.
like this
NoneOfUrBusiness and etai like this.
Rooty
in reply to jjjalljs • • •Teenagers going out to party - bad
Teenagers sitting at home - also bad.
What the hell are kids supposed to do? Just not exist from the period where we stop finding them cute till adulthood?
like this
NoneOfUrBusiness likes this.
wabafee
in reply to Rooty • • •SlopppyEngineer
in reply to wabafee • • •Lost_My_Mind
in reply to SlopppyEngineer • • •jjjalljs
in reply to Rooty • • •like this
NoneOfUrBusiness likes this.
socsa
in reply to jjjalljs • • •UltraGiGaGigantic
in reply to jjjalljs • • •Saleh
in reply to Rooty • • •Sports, Music, Hobbies like board games, Outdoor activities like camping and hiking.
There is plenty of fulfilling things to do together that dont involve alcohol or other drugs or "partying" in the sense of loud music, bad hookups and regrettable videos the next day.
like this
NoneOfUrBusiness likes this.
socsa
in reply to Rooty • • •Going out to party isn't bad. Sitting at home using drugs and alcohol compulsively because you are addicted is bad. It's a fine line to walk but lots of people do it. I did every drug under the sun as a youth and turned out fine, and this applies to pretty much my entire university cohort. Not a single one of them ended up as a junkie.
Should we encourage kids to drink and do drugs? I don't know tbh. That experience was genuinely positive for me because it gets me out there in the world, made me friends and memories and taught me lessons about moderation. From my point of view the people who ended up getting the shit end of the stick were the handful of people I know who got addicted to WoW and online gambling, not the one who did drugs on occasion. But apparently those things are becoming common and culturally acceptable while partying isn't. Take that as you will.
like this
NoneOfUrBusiness likes this.
AA5B
in reply to socsa • • •For my kid who is very athletic, I always phrased it as “don’t destroy your cardio by inhaling any ashes or burning stuff”
But he is so strait laced and so careful with his health that it’s not really an issue.
My other kid is a different story. Luckily he doesn’t like the smell of cigarettes or pot smoke, but I found out his vice when he offered me a gummy. First: cool, second: shit, I was supposed to yell at you
like this
NoneOfUrBusiness likes this.
UltraGiGaGigantic
in reply to Rooty • • •Sir_Kevin
in reply to jjjalljs • • •like this
NoneOfUrBusiness likes this.
NoneOfUrBusiness
in reply to jjjalljs • • •jjjalljs
in reply to NoneOfUrBusiness • • •Does "hard drug" have an agreed upon definition?
I'm pretty sure cigarettes are worse. Much more addictive, harmful to the user and nearby people, and the cigarette butts I think are an environmental hazard.
Alcohol use is as old as human civilization. I don't think light usage is that hazardous.
NoneOfUrBusiness
in reply to jjjalljs • • •There you go.
TLDR: Alcohol is a psychoactive, addictive carcinogen that will give you cancer no matter the consumption (though of course the more you drink the worse it becomes). It'll also fuck up your liver, but that's not mentioned in this article as it focuses on cancer.
That aside, where did you get that cigarettes are more addictive than alcohol? Only one of these will literally kill you if you quit cold turkey unprepared and it's not cigarettes.
item
www.who.intjjjalljs
in reply to NoneOfUrBusiness • • •Most people I've known who smoke are addicted. They get moody and other withdrawal symptoms. No one I know has a similar relationship with alcohol. This is not a scientific study, but that's been my experience. I know there are alcoholics in the world.
Also nicotine and cigarettes are known to be addictive nida.nih.gov/publications/rese…
I'm pretty sure "stopping drinking cold turkey will kill you" is kind of hyperbolic. Most people aren't drinking that heavily. This thread started on the point of moderate drinking.
I acknowledge that even light drinking is unsafe. I wasn't aware it that plausibly that hazardous. Unfortunately, many things are unsafe and I don't think alcohol is going away any time soon. Going out for a drink with friends, there's probably a bunch of hazards there. Unhealthy foods, car exhaust, staying up late.
Is nicotine addictive? | National Institute on Drug Abuse
National Institute on Drug Abuse474D
in reply to MicroWave • • •droporain
in reply to MicroWave • • •EfreetSK
in reply to droporain • • •droporain
in reply to EfreetSK • • •Teppichbrand
in reply to MicroWave • • •therealjcdenton
in reply to MicroWave • • •Passerby6497
in reply to therealjcdenton • • •I would say yes.
therealjcdenton
in reply to Passerby6497 • • •Passerby6497
in reply to therealjcdenton • • •Kusimulkku
in reply to MicroWave • • •HikingVet
in reply to Kusimulkku • • •AA5B
in reply to Kusimulkku • • •Hossenfeffer
in reply to MicroWave • • •like this
massive_bereavement likes this.
jagged_circle
in reply to Hossenfeffer • • •GrumpyDuckling
in reply to MicroWave • • •Passerby6497
in reply to GrumpyDuckling • • •Turns out, the people running this thought of that possibility.
bluewing
in reply to MicroWave • • •What? Is it because teens can't afford booze, cigarettes, and drugs anymore? Maybe they need to buy less Starbucks and avocado toast so they can party more.
This is a good trend I think. I hope they carry it on well into the rest of their lives.
nthavoc
in reply to bluewing • • •bluewing
in reply to nthavoc • • •UnderpantsWeevil
in reply to bluewing • • •Per the article:
...
Smokeydope
in reply to MicroWave • • •Empricorn
in reply to Smokeydope • • •Who's "they"? This is a university study, not one sponsored by Budweiser/Marlboro.
Also, they didn't bother separating based on legality, but did research marijuana use and no, it's not on the rise:
jagged_circle
in reply to Empricorn • • •RememberTheApollo_
in reply to MicroWave • • •I’ll offer this as a possible reason: Kids don’t solo travel like they used to. Kids not wanting driver’s licenses as much is a thing.
I think I can speak for older generations a little - we couldn’t wait to get enough independence to have a bike or driver’s license to get out of the house. There was only the telephone to talk to people - as in no internet, no social media, not everyone had computer games or consoles. Eventually you had messaging services like AIM or IRC, but you didn’t really meet up with friends on them because not everyone had PCs, or cared to learn how to use one. There was cable TV if you were lucky, but you didn’t watch that all day. We went from one friend’s house to another, or friends of friend’s homes. You got exposed to a lot more living conditions, often while completely unsupervised. Bored kids or kids with home problems didn’t mind pilfering the alcohol from the parents, or got whatever drug they could. Usually pot. Nothing else to do. Plus some peer pressure.
Now? Kids text. They meet up online on discord or whatever VoIP or messaging service is cool right now. Group chats. Play online games. They don’t need to leave the house to hang out, and in-person hangouts seem way less important to my kids than it ever was to me when I was younger. That’s a lot less opportunity to be introduced to alcohol or other drugs and have the access to them.
So maybe less peer pressure isn’t necessarily a Covid result, it’s the result of social interaction moving to online spaces and not physical spaces where access to alcohol or other drugs are present.
SoftTeeth
in reply to RememberTheApollo_ • • •People are also more poor in general.
Wages have been stagnating for over 50 years.
Independence requires financial independence.
It's not possible to meaningfully participate in society without disposable income.
This leads to the avg person having less power and influence than almost any of their ancestors.
Unfortunately nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives
Shardikprime
in reply to SoftTeeth • • •isolatedscotch
in reply to Shardikprime • • •UltraGiGaGigantic
in reply to SoftTeeth • • •supersquirrel
in reply to SoftTeeth • • •Video games are fundamentally experiences of agency, of being in some kind of environment that is dynamic, spontaneous and in conversation with the player.
Modern life on the other hand is fundamentally the experience of having no agency and being in a car choked landscape where nothing is dynamic, spontaneous or in conversation with you (especially as pedestrian when not driving).
I am goind to spend time where I have agency, where the landscape was designed in joyous anticipation of someone like me existing in it, the real life human spaces around me have been exhaustively rectified to the brutality and logic of latestage capitalism and thus these "real" landscapes around me are dead.
Society seems to every day increasingly hate and punish people who want to explore, play and create. Why the fuck would I want to spend time in real life spaces when they were designed out of a specific hatred for the kind of thing that makes me feel happy, alive and welcome?
Playing video games is something I do because I am poor AND because I gravitate towards landscapes and communities that were designed by people who don't hate my brain and the way I think and live.
socsa
in reply to MicroWave • • •But what if our teenagers all grow up to be lame?
The coolness gap is real.
ZeffSyde
in reply to socsa • • •Seriously, my teenage niece is a complete square, but still looks up to me as her cool uncle, so I encourage her straight laced nerdiness.
Hopefully she doesn't burn out in her 20s and make a series of painful but cool mistakes like I did.
socsa
in reply to ZeffSyde • • •AA5B
in reply to socsa • • •This is why I’m so annoyed at college “police services” and serious crackdowns on protests. WTF, college, this is not what I pay you for. I pay you to be a sandbox where little Johnny can grow and develop and find his voice. Yes, also suffer consequences for his mistakes, but non-serious consequences. Your job is to better prepare him for life, not ruin his life.
My own effing Alma mater glorified building takeovers from the 1960s, talking about the good changes that eventually developed, but then they changed from being a “security” force trying to protect the kids to a “police” force so they can carry guns and arrest kids. Then during the BLM demonstrations they started arresting kids and kicking them out. WTF.
WoodScientist
in reply to AA5B • • •Seriously. The rule should be, "occupy whatever the hell you want. Just don't create a fire hazard or prevent people from doing their job." Want to sit-in on the hallway outside the university president's office? Fine. Just keep the number small enough to not be a fire hazard. Feel free to shout whatever you want at them while they walk to their door. Don't do anything stupid like chaining yourself to the university president, and you'll be fine.
Yeah, it would be a bit annoying to be that president and to have to walk past protesters during terms. But so what? You signed up to be the president of the university, the human face of the campus administration. You're the highest paid person on campus, behind only the football coach. Don't want to deal with blue haired teenagers shouting at you? Don't sign up to be a university president!
jagged_circle
in reply to MicroWave • • •brlemworld
in reply to jagged_circle • • •TheFonz
in reply to MicroWave • • •x00z
in reply to MicroWave • • •I've done a lot of different drugs, and I'd rank the addictiveness of social media between flakka and crack. (I have not done heroine or fenta)
So yeah, good job USA. /s
solstice
in reply to x00z • • •Zacryon
in reply to MicroWave • • •ZeffSyde
in reply to MicroWave • • •Whenever I see one of these polls being published I imagine how I would have answered them when I was that age, and I would have lied about every negative seeming question.
What if the poll wasn't really anonymous and this data was going to be passed on to future employers or schools?
Lifter
in reply to ZeffSyde • • •Interesting idea but they are comparing different year surveys with the same age children.
Do you think that kids are more prone to lying now, than earlier years?
OpenPassageways
in reply to Lifter • • •Grandwolf319
in reply to OpenPassageways • • •Not only that but back then you didn’t have to worry about it with a simple rule:
Now you don’t have that anymore. Anything can be linked backed to you cause there is always a digital finger print.
Even if you ask random people on the street, there is facial recognition and cameras everywhere.
ZeffSyde
in reply to Lifter • • •Lenny
in reply to MicroWave • • •mechoman444
in reply to MicroWave • • •Krudler
in reply to MicroWave • • •Oy.
Yes, these self-reporting polls have been used for decade as one measurement device. They were fine when it was self-evident what "smoking", "drinking", and "drugs" meant.
Now the issues are far more complex and nuanced, and we now live in a world where the pharmacological knowledge of today's random 14yo outshines what I would have learned in 2nd year university in the 90s.
Kids drink cough syrup recreationally because "that's not drugs". We still live in world of denial where benzos are "drugs" but alcohol isn't because idk I guess the active molecules are suspended in liquid?
Young people have been propagandized and lied to, to the point many don't even know if they're "smoking" or not.
hector
in reply to MicroWave • • •UltraGiGaGigantic
in reply to hector • • •I might just be lucky, but I've had great success in getting in random friend groups while playing games where you can build things and explore.
Valheim, space engineers, minecraft, terraria. Stuff like that.
I think maybe it has to do with people logging into the dedicated server and seeing the stuff you build and they think of you. Plus lots of those servers will have a discord and that's basically getting into a ton of people's DMs. You can post in the discord music you like, funny dumb pictures and memes. Stuff that really shows what you're interested in. This way people can see if they're into the same stuff as you. Then you can branch out to other games or even meet ups IRL.
stevedice
in reply to MicroWave • • •TankovayaDiviziya
in reply to stevedice • • •You also have to give credit to youngins these days that they are smart enough to spend money by going to gym and choosing to live a healthier lifestyle instead. This is according to many news report.
And also, I think the rise of social media is to be credited as well because instead of going out to socialise, the younger generation are socialising digitally. Of course social media has its drawbacks, which is getting highlighted more in recent years for understandable reasons, but it also has an upside and really it offers many alternatives that traditions couldn't. I know us older folks begrudge social media, but hey, it's here to stay. For better or worse.
stevedice
in reply to TankovayaDiviziya • • •nieminen
in reply to stevedice • • •stevedice
in reply to nieminen • • •gearheart
in reply to MicroWave • • •Fades
in reply to MicroWave • • •finitebanjo
in reply to MicroWave • • •NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
in reply to finitebanjo • • •intensely_human
in reply to MicroWave • • •