Skip to main content


US teen drug, alcohol and tobacco use continues to decline


Summary

Teen drug, alcohol, and tobacco use in the U.S. continues to decline, with record-low usage levels reported in 2023, according to the University of Michigan's Monitoring the Future survey.

Among 12th graders, 66% reported no recent use of alcohol, marijuana, cigarettes, or e-cigarettes, while 80% of 10th graders and 90% of 8th graders avoided these substances entirely.

Experts attribute the decline partly to reduced peer pressure during the pandemic.

However, nicotine pouch use has doubled among 12th graders, raising concerns.

Despite pop culture's glamorization of smoking, teen cigarette use remains low.

in reply to someguy3

This. There is no decline at all, I assume. Just an extreme switch to something even more powerful.
in reply to someguy3

Considering the article specifies that drugs, alcohol, and tobacco are “social” activities, I think this makes sense. It’s not good that kids are shifting to solitary activities
in reply to jeffw

Gaming is very much a social activity.

Try finding a triple A game released in the last 10 years that hasnt been heavily designed around multiplayer.

It hasnt been until indie games have really caught on, perhaps as a result of the shift towards open world multiplayer gaming that now dominates, that there is still a market for those types of games.

I know multiple married people that used gaming to connect with each other when they had to be apart.

I was actually on one of those married couples first date because they played league of legends, and that was how I even knew them.

in reply to Jarix

Try finding a triple A game released in the last 10 years that hasnt been heavily designed around multiplayer


What? In 2024 alone, would you say games like Alan Wake 2, Baldurs Gate 3 or Elden Ring are "heavily designed around multiplayer"?

Sure you have your FIFA's and CoD and a bunch of other MP games, but single player games are still a thing.

in reply to ByteJunk

And honestly, my understanding is that the multiplayer games aren't very social: they're almost always using ranked but otherwise random matchmaker settings that mean instead of socializing and getting to know people, you meet your single serving friends and then barely ever see them again.
in reply to metallic_z3r0

Depends on the game... I used to play Overwatch, years ago, with a handful of friends regularly, and it was most certainly a social experience.
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Jarix

Try finding a triple A game released in the last 10 years that hasnt been heavily designed around multiplayer.


cyberpunk 2077

in reply to desktop_user

Thats one example, my point is only that there arent many titles, not that they dont exist
in reply to Jarix

It's solitary social activity. Going out and seeing real people can't be compared to a night gaming. The fact that people don't see each other is actually a very bad thing because it could be a sign of greater depression and loneliness
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Pasta Dental

Sorry but that's like saying social media isnt a social activity. Yes there is s variety of ways to engage with it, but it is something that is causing people to connect with others from a distance.

Its also like saying long distance relationships arent real relationships which would be a ridiculous thing to claim

in reply to Jarix

I believe social media isn't a social activity because you are laying down on your bed typing on your phone chasing likes and replies. And also comparing a long distance relationship to an in-person one is ridiculous. They are completely different because you are not talking to a person, you are talking to a screen. There is absolutely no comparison to be made between online social activities and real life ones. Talking or gaming online is absolutely different from going out with friends at a chalet for a weekend and it's a ridiculous thing to say they are similar
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Pasta Dental

We are at an en passe then as we have fundamentally different perspectives on socializing
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Pasta Dental

If you saw the people I did throughout life, you'd want to stay in the basement as well.

Glad to hear you have met good people throughout life. Just keep in mind not everyone has thar experience.

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to UltraGiGaGigantic

I couldn't stand staying indoors all day for work and then never going outside when not at work, it's too heavy for me
in reply to someguy3

I'm 41, and my cousin has young teens. I asked "Do kids today even play video games?"

And she said "Not in the way you would think. It's not about playstation or nintendo. It's about cell phones and tablets."

Which made me sad. App gaming is laaaaaame.

in reply to Lost_My_Mind

So bad. It can't be very good for developing brains either... Video games can be great for developing things like motor functioning and abstract reasoning, and so much of that is lost with the mindlessness of mobile gaming.
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to desktop_user

I think he meant mobile gaming, like angry birbs and raid shadow candy crunch.
in reply to desktop_user

This must be why "there's an app for that" is a phrase that's been around forever and has nothing to do with the proliferation of mobile devices, i.e. iPhone.
in reply to Lost_My_Mind

I hope that’s just your experience - being relegated to mobile games would be sad. I mean I’m addicted too but I recognize they’re just a time and attention waster.

My older teens are pretty avid gamers as are their friends. One of them started a gaming club at his school! They’re such great kids they sometimes let their Mom or me join a party, and they don’t laugh too hard. But seriously, that’s how they socialize ever since COViD. They’ll spend the entire night in a group chat, listening to music, sometimes teaming up sometimes not, just playing video games and spending time with friends. It works

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to someguy3

Yeah as much as this is good news, I think it’s just a sign of changes that have come in the digital age. Young people go out less in general, because their social life is all online. This is probably safer for them at the end of the day - less driving and less access to substances through friends. But still… the fact that young people are glued to their screens all the time is disturbing. Their lives may be longer, but what is the point of living when all you do is sit inside and consume social media?
in reply to technomad

Most studies found that raising cigarette prices through increased taxes is a highly effective measure for reducing smoking among youth, young adults, and persons of low socioeconomic status. However, there is a striking lack of evidence about the impact of increasing cigarette prices on smoking behavior in heavy/long-term smokers, persons with a dual diagnosis and Aboriginals. nih
in reply to boredsquirrel

Aboriginal Australians are the various Indigenous peoples of the Australian mainland and many of its islands, excluding the ethnically distinct people of the Torres Strait Islands.


:)

in reply to spujb

Aboriginal is mostly associated with Australia, but since this is a Canadian study I thought it would be helpful to link to the tribes there.

For North Americans the term most often heard in popular usage is ‘Indigenous’

in reply to PaupersSerenade

I just wondered how you cannot get rid of tobacco as an aboriginal it seems XD probably rituals?
in reply to boredsquirrel

Because they aren't affected by government pricing, as its all tax.

So, tabacco is tax free. I used to know smokers who would go to the reservations in Ontario and come back with cartons.

in reply to Unforeseen

That is the impact, not the cause, the cause is colonisation and deliberate targeting and abuse of the Indigenous population.
in reply to boredsquirrel

Quite the opposite actually, and not really amusing in the slightest:

The global promotion of commercial tobacco, and the subsequent addiction of Indigenous peoples to commercialized nicotine products, is a modern form of colonization and subjugation at national and international levels.5 Indigenous knowledge values, behaviors, and protocols have been suppressed (oftentimes appropriated for financial gain) through colonization processes implemented by governments, churches, and other institutions.6–8 For example, the US federal government passed the Code of Indian Offenses in 1883, prohibiting Indigenous peoples from the right to perform cultural and traditional ceremonial practices, such as the ghost and sun dances. Both of these ceremonial practices involved the use of ceremonial tobacco.9,10 In Canada, ceremonial tobacco use and ceremonial practices were more broadly illegal under the Indian Act of 1885 and its associated amendments.8 However, commercial tobacco use was not illegal, contributing to the promotion of commercial tobacco use among First Nations (status and non-status) and Métis peoples.8,11 As a direct consequence of these policies, commercial tobacco products were introduced into ceremonial practices as a harmful and unsustainable replacement to sacred tobacco.1,8,11 The restrictions of cultural and ceremonial practices, including use of ceremonial tobacco, were finally lifted in the United States in 1978 and in 1951 in Canada.8,9

Among some Indigenous peoples, the modification, transformation, and commercialization of the Nicotiana tobacco plant belittle, disrespect, and complicate the understanding of these plants that are endemic to Turtle Island.12,13 The widespread availability of commercial tobacco products, the historical restrictions on ceremonial tobacco products, the tobacco industry’s exploitation of tribal sovereignty through tax-exempt tribal cigarette sales and heavy promotion at tribal enterprises, and the Industry’s targeted marketing of commercial tobacco products to Indigenous peoples have enabled frequent use and dependence among Indigenous communities, with concomitant and serious effects on the user’s health, and those exposed to second- and third-hand smoke. These forms of colonization tactics have complicated public health efforts aimed at reducing harms of commercial tobacco in Indigenous communities. Commercial tobacco and its derivatives represent a threat to physical health, spiritual health, and well-being for Indigenous peoples of Turtle Island.5 Today, Indigenous peoples of Turtle Island report the highest prevalence of cigarette smoking, with above 50% in many communities, and lowest quit rates of all groups.14–16 Consequently, high rates of cigarette smoking have led to higher rates of smoking-related disease morbidity and mortality in these communities.17


source

in reply to technomad

According to my school people would just hand them out on the streets for you.
in reply to Scrubbles

When I was your age, people would give away expensive drugs for free on Halloween!
in reply to Scrubbles

Man. Your citys drug dealers are so nice! And also so stupid. That's not a sustainable business model at all.

I know old people who go to the mall, do a lap around the food court, get a free sample on a toothpick of all the fast food in the food court, and call it lunch. They never actually buy any.

in reply to Lost_My_Mind

They do that at Costco too. Costco has these humongous 15’ wide aisles yet there’s always someone finding a way to block it with their cart while they beg for a treat
in reply to MicroWave

Just better at hiding it. From my employees I hear all sorts of harder drugs going around than when I was in the same school
in reply to BigFig

Huh? It's a survey

Sure, they could be lying, but why would they?

And your employee anecdotal stories mean zilch

in reply to JBar2

I love when people reply to data with anecdotes
in reply to BigFig

Are you implying that kids today are more likely to lie on anonymous surveys than past generations? That is a mind-boggling assertion. What makes you think that?
in reply to jeffw

Not that person, but if the survey is taken online, or on any digital format, I would 100% be more likely to lie.
in reply to jeffw

The pandemic did erode trust in institutions, so there's that, but also in general I would be very surprised to learn that today's youth is less or the same amount suspicious as youths in the past. Are those surveys actually anonymous? No way for the youth to know.
in reply to jeffw

because if the survey was done on school computers the students likely know/assume the computer has administrative spyware on it. I know this because when I took a similar survey to this at my school the known spyware program was still running while we took the "anonymous" survey.

No one in their right mind should trust anonymous surveys taken on computers that a known surveillance agency controls.

in reply to MicroWave

“Drug use, particularly among adolescents, is typically a social event,” said Miech. “The social distancing policies during the pandemic were designed so that all teenagers and adolescents hardly interacted with anybody except their own immediate family.”


So… they don’t have friends? Very uplifting

in reply to jeffw

Well, they have friends, but after spending about a year not seeing them in person, they are used to just meeting them online. At least anecdotally that's what I'm seeing with the kids of my group, that going out is a hassle and online is good enough. When they do, it's maybe a total of three or four people hanging out, no big parties to speak of.

On a related note, the schools I know of pretty much stopped having dances other than the prom. In fact, from what I hear, the ability for students to socialize broadly has been pretty much tanked since the pandemic (stricter schedules, no more lockers, and various other measures instituted to avoid congregating students after pandemic and those policies seem to have stuck, presumably because it makes the students a bit easier to manage. It's been a cause for concern for me about their social development, as while I never was big on those events, I at least remember a lot more downtime on school grounds that our kids don't seem to get.

Not just them, frankly we haven't really been seeing folks in person nearly as much since the pandemic. There are certain special occasions, but we almost never have a "random" visit for no particular reason anymore.

in reply to MicroWave

On the one hand, cigarettes are bad and everyone should quit. And alcohol should be used in moderation. And many drugs are very dangerous and addictive and should be avoided. So this is probably good.

On the other hand, if this means are just sitting home alone, maybe having parasocial relationships with influencers, that's sad.

in reply to jjjalljs

Teenagers going out to party - bad

Teenagers sitting at home - also bad.

What the hell are kids supposed to do? Just not exist from the period where we stop finding them cute till adulthood?

in reply to wabafee

Already being worked on. Fertility rates are below replacement rate and keep dropping.
in reply to SlopppyEngineer

Well......yeah. Have you SEEN this world??? I don't want to bring new kids into this awful planet. Do YOU???
This entry was edited (4 days ago)
in reply to Rooty

Sports, Music, Hobbies like board games, Outdoor activities like camping and hiking.

There is plenty of fulfilling things to do together that dont involve alcohol or other drugs or "partying" in the sense of loud music, bad hookups and regrettable videos the next day.

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Rooty

Going out to party isn't bad. Sitting at home using drugs and alcohol compulsively because you are addicted is bad. It's a fine line to walk but lots of people do it. I did every drug under the sun as a youth and turned out fine, and this applies to pretty much my entire university cohort. Not a single one of them ended up as a junkie.

Should we encourage kids to drink and do drugs? I don't know tbh. That experience was genuinely positive for me because it gets me out there in the world, made me friends and memories and taught me lessons about moderation. From my point of view the people who ended up getting the shit end of the stick were the handful of people I know who got addicted to WoW and online gambling, not the one who did drugs on occasion. But apparently those things are becoming common and culturally acceptable while partying isn't. Take that as you will.

in reply to socsa

For my kid who is very athletic, I always phrased it as “don’t destroy your cardio by inhaling any ashes or burning stuff”

But he is so strait laced and so careful with his health that it’s not really an issue.

My other kid is a different story. Luckily he doesn’t like the smell of cigarettes or pot smoke, but I found out his vice when he offered me a gummy. First: cool, second: shit, I was supposed to yell at you

in reply to jjjalljs

Why assume people can't socialize in person without the use of drugs?
in reply to jjjalljs

Why do you single out alcohol as "should be used in moderation"? It's literally a hard drug and way worse than cigarettes.
in reply to NoneOfUrBusiness

Does "hard drug" have an agreed upon definition?

I'm pretty sure cigarettes are worse. Much more addictive, harmful to the user and nearby people, and the cigarette butts I think are an environmental hazard.

Alcohol use is as old as human civilization. I don't think light usage is that hazardous.

in reply to jjjalljs

There you go.

TLDR: Alcohol is a psychoactive, addictive carcinogen that will give you cancer no matter the consumption (though of course the more you drink the worse it becomes). It'll also fuck up your liver, but that's not mentioned in this article as it focuses on cancer.

That aside, where did you get that cigarettes are more addictive than alcohol? Only one of these will literally kill you if you quit cold turkey unprepared and it's not cigarettes.

in reply to NoneOfUrBusiness

Most people I've known who smoke are addicted. They get moody and other withdrawal symptoms. No one I know has a similar relationship with alcohol. This is not a scientific study, but that's been my experience. I know there are alcoholics in the world.

Also nicotine and cigarettes are known to be addictive nida.nih.gov/publications/rese…

I'm pretty sure "stopping drinking cold turkey will kill you" is kind of hyperbolic. Most people aren't drinking that heavily. This thread started on the point of moderate drinking.

I acknowledge that even light drinking is unsafe. I wasn't aware it that plausibly that hazardous. Unfortunately, many things are unsafe and I don't think alcohol is going away any time soon. Going out for a drink with friends, there's probably a bunch of hazards there. Unhealthy foods, car exhaust, staying up late.

in reply to MicroWave

Maybe smartphones and social media are a problem here. Running around buttnaked with penises drawn to you face isn't that fun anymore, if everyone can take a picture/video that might haunt you for decades. It's self-surveillance.
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to therealjcdenton

Among 12th graders, 66% reported no recent use of alcohol, marijuana, cigarettes, or e-cigarettes, while 80% of 10th graders and 90% of 8th graders avoided these substances entirely


I would say yes.

in reply to Passerby6497

I've been told vaping and e-cigs are different, idk if e-cigs in this post include vapes or not tho
in reply to therealjcdenton

They might be talking hardware or product, but either way it's a distinction without a difference. You're still using an electronic device to vaporize a carrier liquid to inhale.
in reply to GrumpyDuckling

Among 12th graders, 66% reported no recent use of alcohol, marijuana, cigarettes, or e-cigarettes, while 80% of 10th graders and 90% of 8th graders avoided these substances entirely


Turns out, the people running this thought of that possibility.

in reply to MicroWave

What? Is it because teens can't afford booze, cigarettes, and drugs anymore? Maybe they need to buy less Starbucks and avocado toast so they can party more.

This is a good trend I think. I hope they carry it on well into the rest of their lives.

in reply to bluewing

Is it because teens can’t afford booze, cigarettes, and drugs anymore?


Per the article:

The decrease in drug usage during the pandemic was somewhat of a surprise to experts. With the lockdowns causing depression rates to rise dramatically, an increase in drugs and drinking wouldn’t have been too much of a shock. But as the biggest factor in drug use for young people is peer pressure, the lockdowns had the opposite effect.

“Drug use, particularly among adolescents, is typically a social event,” said Miech. “The social distancing policies during the pandemic were designed so that all teenagers and adolescents hardly interacted with anybody except their own immediate family.”



...

The continuing decline of teen drug, alcohol and tobacco usage is a positive sign that these industries no longer have the power they once did over the country’s youth. But a disturbing trend in pop culture shows that cigarettes could be sneakily making a comeback.

“I too see more and more smoking in the media and on these different shows I watch with my teenage daughter,” said Miech. “But fortunately, so far, it hasn’t actually translated into higher levels of cigarette smoking among adolescence.”


in reply to MicroWave

They don't want to admit that its because legal recreational pot usage is on the rise as a safer alternative to nicotine and alcohol
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Smokeydope

Who's "they"? This is a university study, not one sponsored by Budweiser/Marlboro.

Also, they didn't bother separating based on legality, but did research marijuana use and no, it's not on the rise:

The results show that a whopping 66% of 12th graders reported no use of alcohol, marijuana, cigarettes or e-cigarettes in the past 30 days. This is the highest abstinence rate recorded since the survey began tracking it in 2017.

Also surprising is that marijuana usage among teens is declining – despite a notable upward trend for adults across the US.

in reply to MicroWave

I’ll offer this as a possible reason: Kids don’t solo travel like they used to. Kids not wanting driver’s licenses as much is a thing.

I think I can speak for older generations a little - we couldn’t wait to get enough independence to have a bike or driver’s license to get out of the house. There was only the telephone to talk to people - as in no internet, no social media, not everyone had computer games or consoles. Eventually you had messaging services like AIM or IRC, but you didn’t really meet up with friends on them because not everyone had PCs, or cared to learn how to use one. There was cable TV if you were lucky, but you didn’t watch that all day. We went from one friend’s house to another, or friends of friend’s homes. You got exposed to a lot more living conditions, often while completely unsupervised. Bored kids or kids with home problems didn’t mind pilfering the alcohol from the parents, or got whatever drug they could. Usually pot. Nothing else to do. Plus some peer pressure.

Now? Kids text. They meet up online on discord or whatever VoIP or messaging service is cool right now. Group chats. Play online games. They don’t need to leave the house to hang out, and in-person hangouts seem way less important to my kids than it ever was to me when I was younger. That’s a lot less opportunity to be introduced to alcohol or other drugs and have the access to them.

So maybe less peer pressure isn’t necessarily a Covid result, it’s the result of social interaction moving to online spaces and not physical spaces where access to alcohol or other drugs are present.

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to RememberTheApollo_

People are also more poor in general.

Wages have been stagnating for over 50 years.

Independence requires financial independence.

It's not possible to meaningfully participate in society without disposable income.

This leads to the avg person having less power and influence than almost any of their ancestors.

Unfortunately nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

in reply to SoftTeeth

I mean if you didn't had disposable income, drugs were the last of your worries in that scenario
in reply to Shardikprime

you'd wish, but the thing with drugs is "you" (the drugs in you) wanna continue even in poverty and homelessness
in reply to SoftTeeth

Video games are fundamentally experiences of agency, of being in some kind of environment that is dynamic, spontaneous and in conversation with the player.

Modern life on the other hand is fundamentally the experience of having no agency and being in a car choked landscape where nothing is dynamic, spontaneous or in conversation with you (especially as pedestrian when not driving).

I am goind to spend time where I have agency, where the landscape was designed in joyous anticipation of someone like me existing in it, the real life human spaces around me have been exhaustively rectified to the brutality and logic of latestage capitalism and thus these "real" landscapes around me are dead.

Society seems to every day increasingly hate and punish people who want to explore, play and create. Why the fuck would I want to spend time in real life spaces when they were designed out of a specific hatred for the kind of thing that makes me feel happy, alive and welcome?

Playing video games is something I do because I am poor AND because I gravitate towards landscapes and communities that were designed by people who don't hate my brain and the way I think and live.

This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to MicroWave

But what if our teenagers all grow up to be lame?

The coolness gap is real.

in reply to socsa

Seriously, my teenage niece is a complete square, but still looks up to me as her cool uncle, so I encourage her straight laced nerdiness.

Hopefully she doesn't burn out in her 20s and make a series of painful but cool mistakes like I did.

in reply to ZeffSyde

This is why it's important for teenagers to make their coolest mistakes early on in life while there are fewer consequences.
in reply to socsa

This is why I’m so annoyed at college “police services” and serious crackdowns on protests. WTF, college, this is not what I pay you for. I pay you to be a sandbox where little Johnny can grow and develop and find his voice. Yes, also suffer consequences for his mistakes, but non-serious consequences. Your job is to better prepare him for life, not ruin his life.

My own effing Alma mater glorified building takeovers from the 1960s, talking about the good changes that eventually developed, but then they changed from being a “security” force trying to protect the kids to a “police” force so they can carry guns and arrest kids. Then during the BLM demonstrations they started arresting kids and kicking them out. WTF.

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to AA5B

Seriously. The rule should be, "occupy whatever the hell you want. Just don't create a fire hazard or prevent people from doing their job." Want to sit-in on the hallway outside the university president's office? Fine. Just keep the number small enough to not be a fire hazard. Feel free to shout whatever you want at them while they walk to their door. Don't do anything stupid like chaining yourself to the university president, and you'll be fine.

Yeah, it would be a bit annoying to be that president and to have to walk past protesters during terms. But so what? You signed up to be the president of the university, the human face of the campus administration. You're the highest paid person on campus, behind only the football coach. Don't want to deal with blue haired teenagers shouting at you? Don't sign up to be a university president!

in reply to MicroWave

I've done a lot of different drugs, and I'd rank the addictiveness of social media between flakka and crack. (I have not done heroine or fenta)

So yeah, good job USA. /s

in reply to x00z

I just saw a documentary of some sort talking about how movies and tv shows these days are specifically designed to be watchable with minimal viewer engagement because everyone is on their phone and the tv is a second screen. At least, I think that's what they were saying, I was barely paying attention because I was on my phone doom scrolling. I've done every drug in the book plus a bunch that I'd be seriously impressed if you had ever heard of them, and none of them touch the addictiveness of my stupid phone.
in reply to MicroWave

Whenever I see one of these polls being published I imagine how I would have answered them when I was that age, and I would have lied about every negative seeming question.

What if the poll wasn't really anonymous and this data was going to be passed on to future employers or schools?

in reply to ZeffSyde

Interesting idea but they are comparing different year surveys with the same age children.

Do you think that kids are more prone to lying now, than earlier years?

in reply to Lifter

Possibly? Could correspond with increased digital surveillance. Most people understand that nothing is private anymore.
in reply to OpenPassageways

Not only that but back then you didn’t have to worry about it with a simple rule:

They ask you a question, do they know your name or who you are? No? It’s anonymous.


Now you don’t have that anymore. Anything can be linked backed to you cause there is always a digital finger print.

Even if you ask random people on the street, there is facial recognition and cameras everywhere.

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to Lifter

I'd wager that teenagers these day are much more aware of data collection and more protective of personal information then they were 10-20 years ago. I could be giving them too much credit, though.
in reply to MicroWave

I quit smoking a long time ago after many attempts. The key was to simply get poor enough that I simply couldn't afford it. Perhaps that's what we're seeing here.
in reply to MicroWave

Of course better education and all that stuff becoming super expensive makes it much less desirable.
in reply to MicroWave

Oy.

Yes, these self-reporting polls have been used for decade as one measurement device. They were fine when it was self-evident what "smoking", "drinking", and "drugs" meant.

Now the issues are far more complex and nuanced, and we now live in a world where the pharmacological knowledge of today's random 14yo outshines what I would have learned in 2nd year university in the 90s.

Kids drink cough syrup recreationally because "that's not drugs". We still live in world of denial where benzos are "drugs" but alcohol isn't because idk I guess the active molecules are suspended in liquid?

Young people have been propagandized and lied to, to the point many don't even know if they're "smoking" or not.

in reply to hector

I might just be lucky, but I've had great success in getting in random friend groups while playing games where you can build things and explore.

Valheim, space engineers, minecraft, terraria. Stuff like that.

I think maybe it has to do with people logging into the dedicated server and seeing the stuff you build and they think of you. Plus lots of those servers will have a discord and that's basically getting into a ton of people's DMs. You can post in the discord music you like, funny dumb pictures and memes. Stuff that really shows what you're interested in. This way people can see if they're into the same stuff as you. Then you can branch out to other games or even meet ups IRL.

in reply to MicroWave

Nah, here's the real reason. When I was the nightclubbing age, you could get a bottle of booze, 6 cans of coke and mineral water for like $50. Last time I went to a club, I paid $120 for the same thing. People in the 18-25 age range don't have $120 to drop every Friday.
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to stevedice

You also have to give credit to youngins these days that they are smart enough to spend money by going to gym and choosing to live a healthier lifestyle instead. This is according to many news report.

And also, I think the rise of social media is to be credited as well because instead of going out to socialise, the younger generation are socialising digitally. Of course social media has its drawbacks, which is getting highlighted more in recent years for understandable reasons, but it also has an upside and really it offers many alternatives that traditions couldn't. I know us older folks begrudge social media, but hey, it's here to stay. For better or worse.

in reply to TankovayaDiviziya

It's probably my choice of gym but I see almost no young people in it. It's mostly 30-somethings that figured out that eating garbage all the time and staying thin stops at 30. Yes, that includes me.
in reply to stevedice

Worth noting that school age kids have a vastly different free times than most of us. I often see the same group you're talking about at the gym, but if I show up right after 5 I see a bunch of high schoolers. They must like to go just after school.