"Formerly Office", now balls-deep in AI.

#Microslop

in reply to ๐Ÿ…ฐ๐Ÿ…ป๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ…ด (๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿฆ„)

I should state for the record that I think LLMs and other forms of AI have some valid and worthwhile uses, and that *none* of them should be tied to big tech or capitalism.

See things like:
- accessibility
- some types of research
- spell-check and predictive keyboards
- spam/scam filtering

reshared this

in reply to ๐Ÿ…ฐ๐Ÿ…ป๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ…ด (๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿฆ„)

I agree, my nephew is using his own models ( as part of a serious research project ) to predict avian flu spread ( amongst many other pandemics ). They should absolutely be kept out of all creative activities ( other than as assistants ) and most definitely should not be centrally controlled or owned.
in reply to ๐Ÿ…ฐ๐Ÿ…ป๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ…ด (๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿฆ„)

I think the relevant culprit is not AI, not even LLMs, it's the "Generative" part, so when the crap starts to output CONTENT, not just analysis results. Generating something from nothing is, in essence, alchemy, and from what I can say, generative ai is just about as much sharlatanery as alchemy's always been.
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to ๐Ÿ…ฐ๐Ÿ…ป๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ…ด (๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿฆ„)

I agree 100% AI, ML and LLMs (I have a local model) are my hobby. I believe that as long as hallucinations remain an unresolved problem, LLMs shouldn't be on search engines, news sources or anything where accuracy and facts are paramount. I love the tech, hate what tech bros have done with it.
in reply to ๐Ÿ…ฐ๐Ÿ…ป๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ…ด (๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿฆ„)

I moved to linux a little while ago just because I liked tinkering and because my laptop kept having issues with Windows updates. But the more Microsoft does, the better I feel about it

reshared this

in reply to ๐Ÿ…ฐ๐Ÿ…ป๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ…ด (๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿฆ„)

Please tell me this is made up. I'm starting to read posts on Microslop, so I'm guessing it is real, but I do have a tiny bit of hope that MICROS~1 didn't do something this stupid...

Ah, who am I kidding, this is Microsoft. In fact the same Microsoft of the free webmail service "Outlook", of the mail client "Outlook" and of the webmail for Exchange "Outlook", and I'm probably forgetting something else they've named "Outlook" too. So naming choices certainly aren't their strong suit.

#Microslop

in reply to ๐Ÿ…ฐ๐Ÿ…ป๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ…ด (๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿฆ„)

My company had to disable Teams video recording and transcription services bc of the copilot stuff, due to security concerns. It's been more than a year and we haven't gotten it back.

This stuff is being shoved down our throats and major organizations are unable to use it bc it's so unsafe. It's making these applications pure bloatware/malware.

Honestly, it's a good time for new developers to enter the space with non-enshittified products.

in reply to rotsaruckz63

@rotsaruckz63 @sylvie I am so happy to have escaped that crap 10 years ago. but sometimes you cant avoid it or you will loose your job, sadly.

for example libre office still messes complex word documents with mixed tables, change tracking marks, and lots of styles and hierarchical chapters; for these I have word 2010 in a win10 vm, I rarely use it except for customer specs, most docs can be directly edited in libre office without messing them up.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source

C++ Wage Slave

There seems to be some confusion about whether it's real or not. This site insists that it's a misunderstanding rather than a rebranding of the whole office suite:

office-watch.com/2026/microsofโ€ฆ

@njsg

@njsg
in reply to ๐Ÿ…ฐ๐Ÿ…ป๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ…ด (๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿฆ„)

in reply to C++ Wage Slave

@CppGuy I didn't do a lot of research on this, it did look like there was some change in April 2025, and that that message has been there since then (thank you, Wayback machine!), but I was thinking it could well be that Microsoft has announced they are now, on top of that, renaming the standalone non-subscription software too, in a change that hadn't been reflected in the site yet (I was wondering if Nadella had said something like that).

Either way, their wording *is* quite confusing, but at this point it's the same mess as Outlook. Why do they do naming like this? Is it a selling point if the consumer can't even name what they want to buy? (Perhaps it is, if the intent is to hide the less profitable options...)

In the end, we may have to wait for the next release of the non-subscription suite to know for sure...

(I'm also perhaps skeptical of the part in the office-watch.com article which says some subscriptions only have Copilot if you pay extra, given how much they're pushing GenAI. If this is indeed currently the case, it likely it will change.)

in reply to ๐Ÿ…ฐ๐Ÿ…ป๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ…ด (๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿฆ„)

Wait... is that... CLIPPY hiding there in plain sight? Is Microsoft finally admitting that copilot is just another useless, annoying, pushy distraction getting in the way?

"You look like you're trying to write something meaningful! Would you like me to replace that with the average of a million strangers shitposting on the Internet?"

#Microsoft #AI #LLM #Copilot #Clippy

in reply to ๐Ÿ…ฐ๐Ÿ…ป๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ…ด (๐ŸŒˆ๐Ÿฆ„)

this feels like โ€œNewspeakโ€ from 1984, but instead of reducing thought directly is by means of destroying real meaning
โ€œHey do you have Word?, the Office thingyโ€ now becomes โ€œdo you have a subscription to the Microsoft 360 copilot app Word with copilot? The agentic text editor with AIโ€
I truly believe no one truly think this is good, they just awestruck
โ‡ง