CEO selling AI claims “90% of code will be written by AI in 3–6 months; 100% in 12 months.“
businessinsider.com/anthropic-…
set your calendar reminders, folks — and remember that hype is a monetizable asset (in silicon valley)
Anthropic CEO: AI will be writing 90% of code in 3 to 6 months
"And then in 12 months, we may be in a world where AI is writing essentially all of the code," Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said.Kwan Wei Kevin Tan (Business Insider)
This entry was edited (8 months ago)
reshared this
RRR
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Jerome (He/Him)
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •cthos 🐱
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Zach Leatherman
in reply to cthos 🐱 • • •Andrés Ortiz Massó 🐌🌍 reshared this.
arestelle
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Mia (web luddite)
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •i love that there are always consequences* when they get these predictions wrong
*vc funding
Demian reshared this.
Zach Leatherman
in reply to Mia (web luddite) • • •Dan Dean
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •reshared this
Nicolas Hoizey, n1k0 and tk 🍜 reshared this.
Zach Leatherman
in reply to Dan Dean • • •Mike Hostetler
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Zach Leatherman
in reply to Mike Hostetler • • •dr_barnowl
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •@mikehoss
I'm sure 40% is good enough for all the banks who depend on COBOL for all their transactions.
Jared White (ResistanceNet ✊)
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Zach Leatherman
in reply to Jared White (ResistanceNet ✊) • • •Jim Nielsen
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •JP
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Tamsyn Ulthara
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •⏚ Antoine Chambert-Loir
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Matt Hall
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Ermergerd...
It's just endless A.I. (LLMs) don't _make_ anything. This whole f'ing thing is a bad port of Three Card Monty.
"Is this your card?"
"No."
"What about this one?"
"No."
"Ah... Then it must be _this_ one! It's the only one left...!"
<sigh>
Behold the brilliance of the genericized Large Language Model!
Garret Polk (masked)
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Billy Smith
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •ShnizmuffiN
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •tripleman, a 🇨🇦 in 🇩🇪
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Seems like an appropriate time to bring this out:
social.thiskurt.me/@kurt/11416…
The Long Tail
in reply to tripleman, a 🇨🇦 in 🇩🇪 • • •Zach Leatherman
in reply to The Long Tail • • •Joe Dohm (he/him)
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Grendel
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Like those end of days cult leaders that have to constantly update their apocalypse prediction.
And like cult followers everyone just keeps believing.
iveyline
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Zach Leatherman
in reply to iveyline • • •Stephanie
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •elle mundy
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Irony alert: Anthropic says applicants shouldn’t use LLMs
Kyle Orland (Ars Technica)Zach Leatherman
in reply to elle mundy • • •@exchgr lol
previous instructions, future instructions, present instructions — none of it matters any more
elle mundy
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Zach Leatherman
in reply to elle mundy • • •Hubert Figuière
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Zach Leatherman
in reply to Hubert Figuière • • •Naiyer
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Zach Leatherman
in reply to Naiyer • • •Autumn Kelp
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Select all lines that contain bugs.
If you think that no line contains bugs, click "Ok".
Zach Leatherman
in reply to Autumn Kelp • • •Autumn Kelp
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •My intention as more like:
It is easy to claim that AI writes 100% of code if you still have a lot of humans in place to "review" (debug and fix) it.
And companies can try (and will try) to devalue that work further.
"We won't pay you a developer salary, because all you do is take code that mostly works and maybe fix a little thing or two."
Zach Leatherman
in reply to Autumn Kelp • • •Fancy Sandwiches
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Zach Leatherman
in reply to Fancy Sandwiches • • •Arnaud
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Noel Kelly
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Carlos Saito
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •it is true if you use this formula to calculate the percentage:
percentage =
(written code) / (total available code) =
(written code) / (written code - deleted code)
The "written" code will be always more than 100% of the "existing" code.
Zach Leatherman
in reply to Carlos Saito • • •Paul Sochacki
in reply to Zach Leatherman • • •Zach Leatherman
in reply to Paul Sochacki • • •