First talk today at the Social Web Devroom we have @pfefferle talking about the state of WordPress's fediverse integration #FOSDEM #ActivityPub #fedidev
@haubles just dropped the massive news that Mastodon is going to be changing the default signup flow on mobile apps to choose an instance thats geographically close to you instead of choosing mastodon.social by default!
We are excited to share that we are beginning work on a new onboarding experiment for #Mastodon: Default Server Recommendations.
Our intent for this experiment is to recommend the closest server geographically that is in the correct language during the sign-up flow. We will be running this experiment on our iOS and Android apps only to start.
@disisdeguey @haubles It will be interesting to see how they will source the location data.
For example, arewedecentralizedyet.online/m… lists mastodon.scot in the US, because it's behind Cloudflare, and ailbhean.co-shaoghal.net will come up in Germany, because it's hosted by Hetzner. Both are Scottish communities though.
A map and data directory showcasing ActivityPub service providers, each specifically catering to a certain locality or offering support in a notable language.
Soziale Netzwerke als demokratische Kraft retten Info-Call zum Digital Independence Day Wie wechsele ich von X & Co. ins Fediverse? am 4. Januar 2026 von 14 bis 15 Uhr Weitere Infos Unterstütze...
Taking a tiny break to get some fresh air and then ruin the freshness with a cigarette and then back to my regularly scheduled programming. @andypiper has awarded me "official love blog status" so now my duty has peerpressure!
@andypiper lmao I'm watching the stream and I heard someone say "You cant leave, you're doing the official live blog" in between talks. I assume that was you two
I sadly had to step out so I missed @tobias's presentation about the amazing Friendica but there should be a recording of it fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event…
@reiver @Bonfire @swf @matrix, who are still in the process of implementing MLS I think (arewemlsyet.com/), expressed interest in getting various Social media protocols to implement Matrix a few months ago. Though I'm not sure what that would look like
One of the project areas of the Social Web Foundation for the last year has been end-to-end encrypted messaging. ActivityPub, the standard protocol that powers the Social Web, has privacy controls, but they do not protect the content of messages from server operators. Encrypted messaging has become a common feature on many social networks since ActivityPub was created, and its lack has inhibited Social Web adoption and public trust in the network.
ActivityPub is extensible, though. As part of our E2EE program, Mallory, Tom and I adapted the Messaging Layer Security (MLS) standard as an extension of ActivityPub to make the MLS over ActivityPub specification. The protocol fits the great MLS E2EE system onto the ActivityPub API and federation protocol.
But a protocol specification is not enough; it must be implemented. That’s why we’re so happy to announce that the Sovereign Tech Fund has commissioned work with the Social Web Foundation to coordinate two new interoperable implementations of MLS over ActivityPub. This investment by the Sovereign Tech Fund will help move the Fediverse towards more privacy for social web users, no matter what server they use.
We decided to partner with two different projects in order to make sure that we’re making an open standard that can work between implementations. With two implementers, we’ll need to communicate clearly about architectural and implementation decisions, and make sure that those decisions end up in the final version of the spec — not in a TODO comment in the source code of a single project.
The first project is Emissary, the great social web application platform behind projects like Atlas and Bandwagon. Ben Pate, Emissary founder, says, “The Emissary Project is deeply committed to the Fediverse, where we are building a free and trustworthy Internet for all 8 billion humans. Delivering on that promise, Emissary is excited to team up with the Social Web Foundation to bring End-to-End-Encryption (E2EE) to the Fediverse. We are eternally grateful for the SWF’s leadership and support, without which this project could not have happened. Our work is already underway, and in 2026 anyone will be able to build E2EE applications on the Emissary platform.”
The second project is Bonfire. Bonfire is a modular framework for building federated apps, with its first app (Bonfire Social) offering a social networking experience enhanced with tools for privacy, trust, and collaboration (such as circles and boundaries).
The maintainers of Bonfire, Ivan Minutillo and Mayel de Borniol, said: “We think that end-to-end encryption should simply be the default for any private communication online. Working with the Social Web Foundation to bring E2EE to ActivityPub marks a crucial step in fostering privacy and trust, and especially in enabling the fediverse to become a safe space for activists and communities to organise, coordinate, and collaborate meaningfully. By making secure, user-friendly messaging a core part of the fediverse, we’re helping lay the groundwork for decentralised networks where people can go beyond talking in the mythical ‘global town square’ and actually organise and accomplish things together.”
This work will happen best if the Fediverse community tracks it closely. We’ll be making updates here on the SWF blog as progress continues. Developers and active users may also be interested in the ActivityPub E2EE Messaging Task Force at the W3C, where the specification is being developed into a report for the Social Web Community group. Finally, we’ll be using the #JustBetweenUs hashtag to share progress and ideas, so you can follow it to see what’s been happening.
Encrypted direct messages supply the confidence that people need to connect with family, friends and colleagues privately over a social network. As part of the Summer of Protocols 2024, we explore …
@mayel @ivan @bonfire I missed the Bonfire talk unfortunately but I'm very interested in watching the recording when that's up! I've been thinking about standing up an instance for my local community recently - it seems super cool
that doesn't help in this case unless that information is used and visualized in places like name autocomplete and weighting of search results. Also it requires everyone to have a website or place that they own which is only the case for tech and larger personalities
as I posted already publicly I'm bothered by the fact they went for AI slop rather than pulling the actual memes, in a community where this is very frowned upon
Having a small world moment recognizing @raffomania from my time in Hamburg, where we had some overlapping years at the university's computer science campus and apparently exchanged a couple of emails. Not sure if we ever met face to face. Cool project! 🙂
@raffomania Likewise! 😀 I'm up to my neck in teaching and organizational work for the day job this winter, but I'm hoping to make progress on @encyclia again in the warmer months.
"barebones" i'll grant, but the idea of "no notifications" is funny because the inbox is all notifications. a separate "home feed" would ideally be an, uh... separate feed. in many cases you can construct one based on the notifications you receive in your inbox! that doesn't seem to be what mastodon is going for, though, so it's no wonder they weren't keen on using it (i.e. different goals)
and @Gargron is wrong... I'd say "as usually" but that'd just be mean.
Email clients have been built into rich messaging platforms despite resting on a much more barebones base vocabulary in comparison to ActivityStreams.
What Gagron did was show a severe lack of imagination, and thusly condemn a passable interface to an obscurity that some of us have been trying to overcome ever since...
Being serious for a moment, a short, pithy boiling down of "The exchange of ideas functions well only when shared norms are agreed and enforced in the public square"
Relations are the most important information for agencies to extract. They want to know your network. What did he say about encryption of this very dangerous data? Do these people think about privacy? I hope the answer will be "yes, they do and here is the spec for an end to end encrypted system that encrypts user data, too".
@cypherhippie what’s the best place to track your work with DIDs in the fediverse?
In the atproto world there’s an emerging extension of PLC that has a lot of promise as a far more decentralized identity ledger: discourse.atprotocol.community…
I was encouraged to open a discussion about my didplcbft project here. I figure it is indeed a bit better than trying to discuss this 300 characters at a time on a mostly one-on-one basis 😆 didplcbft is an experimental PLC implementation.
@haubles I hope international boundaries will be taken into consideration. Many mobile apps (such as dating apps) use geographical proximity, and it’s not helpful where I live, as preference is given to a rather hostile neighbouring country over the nearest cities in my own country.
Wordpress does certainly not guarantee an influx of developers competent enough to build a social network that brings the needed privacy features.
Encryption of private messages? Encryption of user data?
Mastodon does not do that and currently people are creating a giant privacy problem for all Fediverse users. But Wordpress will bring another level of security problems on top of that, this is begging for disaster.
@uriel there isnt an implementation of any protocol that has all these properties, which is one reason why Christine has been working on Spritely Goblins this whole time
@uriel this is a talk about these properties *for* the fediverse. Retroshare is not being made for global public communication or many of the things that we use the fediverse for. I don't think Retroshare would want people to try to shoehorn the project into use for the sorts of things that Spritely is being built for
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •like this
Tlapka🐾 and ⁂ Kyva like this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •reshared this
Andy Piper, Disisdeguey🔻PalestineAction🇵🇸, athmane mokraoui [BoF] ⏚ꝃ⌁⁂ and @reiver ⊼ (Charles) reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •@haubles just dropped the massive news that Mastodon is going to be changing the default signup flow on mobile apps to choose an instance thats geographically close to you instead of choosing mastodon.social by default!
UPDATE: their official announcement here: mastodon.social/@Mastodon/1159…
Mastodon
2026-01-31 12:51:49
Rita ⁂ likes this.
reshared this
Disisdeguey🔻PalestineAction🇵🇸, Celia Valdeolmillos, Jure Repinc, Elias Probst, GunChleoc, L'égrégore André ꕭꕬ, Peter Brown, Matt, El Duvelle, Jules 🍺, Marta Threadbare, Ulrike Hahn, FediThing, @reiver ⊼ (Charles), linjari, Mr. Funk E. Dude, Juan Per¢ent,🇲🇽 🍉,🇻🇪, Andy Piper, Petra van Cronenburg, Sarafina and Øjvind Fritjof Arnfred reshared this.
Disisdeguey🔻PalestineAction🇵🇸
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •GunChleoc
in reply to Disisdeguey🔻PalestineAction🇵🇸 • • •@disisdeguey @haubles It will be interesting to see how they will source the location data.
For example, arewedecentralizedyet.online/m… lists mastodon.scot in the US, because it's behind Cloudflare, and ailbhean.co-shaoghal.net will come up in Germany, because it's hosted by Hetzner. Both are Scottish communities though.
Maybe they can collaborate with jaz.co.uk/projects/mastodon-ne…?
cc @andypiper @jaz
Fediverse Near Me
jaz (jaz-michael king's blog)reshared this
L'égrégore André ꕭꕬ and Disisdeguey🔻PalestineAction🇵🇸 reshared this.
Matt
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •El Duvelle
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •🇩🇪
Björn Staschen (Save Social)wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •@evanprodromou is up next talking about Tags.pub #HashTagsAreGreat
github.com/social-web-foundati…
GitHub - social-web-foundation/tags.pub: Global hashtag server
GitHubwakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •reshared this
@reiver ⊼ (Charles) and Tokyo Outsider (337ppm) reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •@reiver ⊼ (Charles) reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •1) "Communities must be in control"
2) "Nobody shall be locked-in"
3) "There is NO FREE marketplace of ideas."
@reiver ⊼ (Charles) reshared this.
rag. Gustavino Bevilacqua
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •⁂ Kyva likes this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •@reiver ⊼ (Charles) reshared this.
Eugen Rochko
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •Fediverse Iconography
iconography.fediverse.infoTim Chambers reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •github.com/raffomania/ties
GitHub - raffomania/ties: 🪢Federated website aggregator
GitHubreshared this
Disisdeguey🔻PalestineAction🇵🇸, Tim Chambers, Evan Prodromou and Sun Kitty ☀️ reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •@reiver ⊼ (Charles) reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •⁂ Kyva likes this.
reshared this
Andy Piper and @reiver ⊼ (Charles) reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •reshared this
Sun Kitty ☀️ and informapirata ⁂ reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •reshared this
@reiver ⊼ (Charles) reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •reshared this
@reiver ⊼ (Charles), informapirata ⁂ and veroandi_br reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •⁂ Kyva likes this.
@reiver ⊼ (Charles) reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •@tsyesika and @cwebber up next talking about what's next for the fediverse!
stream.fosdem.org/h2215.m3u8
reshared this
Christine Lemmer-Webber and Rony reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •reshared this
@reiver ⊼ (Charles), Disisdeguey🔻PalestineAction🇵🇸, Tokyo Outsider (337ppm), Tom Casavant and Ruth Mottram reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •Tom Casavant reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •Tom Casavant reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •@reiver ⊼ (Charles) reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •Tom Casavant
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •Andy Piper
in reply to Tom Casavant • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •reshared this
@reiver ⊼ (Charles), Box464, myrmepropagandist, Demian and PhilVia > FOSDEM reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •reshared this
@reiver ⊼ (Charles) and PhilVia > FOSDEM reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •reshared this
Co-op Cloud, Village One Cooperative and PhilVia > FOSDEM reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •reshared this
Village One Cooperative and PhilVia > FOSDEM reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •Anuj Ahooja reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •reshared this
radioactivestardust and PhilVia > FOSDEM reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •reshared this
@reiver ⊼ (Charles), Andy Piper and Tom Casavant reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event…
FOSDEM 2026 - Friendica - Hidden in plain sight since 2025
fosdem.orgwakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event…
FOSDEM 2026 - Fedi legacy
fosdem.orgreshared this
@reiver ⊼ (Charles) and Ian Forrester | @cubicgarden reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •@reiver ⊼ (Charles) reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •reshared this
Andy Piper and PhilVia > FOSDEM reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •PhilVia > FOSDEM reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •reshared this
@reiver ⊼ (Charles) and PhilVia > FOSDEM reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •reshared this
@reiver ⊼ (Charles) and ralf tauscher reshared this.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •reshared this
@reiver ⊼ (Charles), Evan Prodromou and PhilVia > FOSDEM reshared this.
@reiver ⊼ (Charles)
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •@Bonfire @swf
I heard Bluesky was looking at MLS, too.
I don't know if they went that route.
Tom Casavant
in reply to @reiver ⊼ (Charles) • • •@matrix, who are still in the process of implementing MLS I think (arewemlsyet.com/), expressed interest in getting various Social media protocols to implement Matrix a few months ago. Though I'm not sure what that would look like
Are We MLS Yet?
Are We MLS Yet?Evan Prodromou
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •@Bonfire @swf more info here
#justbetweenus
socialwebfoundation.org/2025/1…
Evan Prodromou
@Bonfire @swf more info here
#justbetweenus
socialwebfoundation.org/2025/1…
Evan Prodromou
2025-12-19 17:07:33
@reiver ⊼ (Charles) reshared this.
raphaël ⁂ bastide
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to raphaël ⁂ bastide • • •Tobias
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •Jonathan Frederickson
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •Kevin Marks
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to Kevin Marks • • •Kevin Marks
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to Kevin Marks • • •Lucy @ FOSDEM
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to Lucy @ FOSDEM • • •Oblomov
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •yeah they're the brandjacking champions of the Fediverse, and they censor and block anyone mentioning this.
Relevant links:
qua.name/diorama/software-iden…
qua.name/diorama/astroturfing-…
qua.name/diorama/accusations-b…
accusations-by-mastodonuno-will-not-stop-freedom-of-information
qua.nameFedimedia Italia APS ⁂
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •Fedi Fox
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •Julian Fietkau
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to Julian Fietkau • • •Rafael
in reply to Julian Fietkau • • •Julian Fietkau
in reply to Rafael • • •@raffomania Likewise! 😀 I'm up to my neck in teaching and organizational work for the day job this winter, but I'm hoping to make progress on @encyclia again in the warmer months.
@liaizon
Rafael
in reply to Julian Fietkau • • •Wess Daniels
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •marius
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •infinite love ⴳ
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •infinite love ⴳ
in reply to infinite love ⴳ • • •marius
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •and @Gargron is wrong... I'd say "as usually" but that'd just be mean.
Email clients have been built into rich messaging platforms despite resting on a much more barebones base vocabulary in comparison to ActivityStreams.
What Gagron did was show a severe lack of imagination, and thusly condemn a passable interface to an obscurity that some of us have been trying to overcome ever since...
Jay
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to Jay • • •Jay
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •OK I snrk-lol'd 🙂
Being serious for a moment, a short, pithy boiling down of
"The exchange of ideas functions well only when shared norms are agreed and enforced in the public square"
Fedi Fox
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •@cypherhippie
Relations are the most important information for agencies to extract. They want to know your network. What did he say about encryption of this very dangerous data? Do these people think about privacy? I hope the answer will be "yes, they do and here is the spec for an end to end encrypted system that encrypts user data, too".
The "P" in "Fediverse" is for privacy.
Erlend Sogge Heggen
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •@cypherhippie what’s the best place to track your work with DIDs in the fediverse?
In the atproto world there’s an emerging extension of PLC that has a lot of promise as a far more decentralized identity ledger: discourse.atprotocol.community…
Didplcbft - a decentralized approach to did:plc
ATProtocol Communitywakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to Erlend Sogge Heggen • • •pettter
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to pettter • • •Emmavetch
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •Саша Морс, here we go again...
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •Leander Lindahl
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to Leander Lindahl • • •Andy Piper
in reply to Leander Lindahl • • •FOSDEM 2026 - Tending the Herd: Community at Mastodon
fosdem.orgFedi Fox
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •@andypiper @haubles @Mastodon
Did he use the words "encryption" or "privacy"?
Fedi Fox
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •#Fediverse # FOSDEM
Wordpress does certainly not guarantee an influx of developers competent enough to build a social network that brings the needed privacy features.
Encryption of private messages? Encryption of user data?
Mastodon does not do that and currently people are creating a giant privacy problem for all Fediverse users. But Wordpress will bring another level of security problems on top of that, this is begging for disaster.
wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
Unknown parent • • •Mike P
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •wakest ⁂ FOSDEM
in reply to Mike P • • •FOSDEM - video recordings
video.fosdem.orgwakest ⁂ FOSDEM
Unknown parent • • •Uriel Fanelli
in reply to wakest ⁂ FOSDEM • • •There are—and more than one. Never heard of RetroShare? Instead of declarative sentences like "there is no," why not say "I am not aware of any"?
Yet you've answered my question: you don't exchange knowledge because you think you know everything.