Most effective map navigation app?
I've been using Waze for the past year but I just looked it up and realised that it's also owned by Google.
I tried using OsmAnd yesterday twice, but the first time I went through a tunnel it just stopped giving directions when I came out of the tunnel (a bug I assume). The second time on the way home, it took me down the wrong exit and I almost ended up at the airport!
Anybody have a better experience with other apps? I've just installed Organic Maps so I'll see how that goes this week.
DeGoogle Yourself reshared this.
over_clox
in reply to JoelJ • • •GPS (and cellular) doesn't work in tunnels, and it takes a number of seconds for it to reconnect and get GPS coordinates again once you come out of the tunnel.
This is true for all GPS apps and services.
DeGoogle Yourself reshared this.
rumba
in reply to over_clox • • •The commercial options guess where you are in the tunnel based on crowdsource speed outside of the tunnel in both directions. When you come out of the tunnel you don't have GPS service but they will continue to guess until they reconnect which is a rather nice feature.
I have had organic maps freak out coming out of a tunnel and just never reconnect.
JoelJ
in reply to over_clox • • •over_clox
in reply to JoelJ • • •And it still might take a minute or two for your cellular to reconnect to gather further directions.
Some apps just might be better about the cellular reconnect side than others, I haven't tried them all.
Even then, it can take over a minute to reconnect to some cellular networks after a tunnel blackout, which may exceed the timeout of some mapping app data requests.
Dave
in reply to over_clox • • •over_clox
in reply to Dave • • •I hear ya, but it would have to be done with at least some form of red safety indicator, like..
"NO CONNECTION, LOCATION ESTIMATED"
On a side note, why don't Teslas obey the law that says not to stop in tunnels?
youtube.com/watch?v=E531GxfEoB…
Dave
in reply to over_clox • • •If I'm honest I'm actually wondering why none if those drivers were paying attention. Cars blow tyres or otherwise stop, it's not limited to misbehaving teslas. The tesla wasn't braking hard and suddenly, it just slowed down.
In my mind the drivers should have been paying more attention.
Sorry, I know we like to hate on teslas here. I still wouldn't buy one (or be a passenger).
over_clox
in reply to Dave • • •Indeed you're right, the following drivers should have been paying more attention. Regardless, shit happens, whether it's a wet noodle or a dry chip controlling the vehicle.
How about a sideline test, send a half dozen electric vehicles through a tunnel, all on autopilot, and have the lead vehicle blow a tire. What would all the following vehicles on auto drive end up doing?
Dave
in reply to over_clox • • •This is actually a perfect use case for a car controlling itself. Automatically applying emergency brakes is something cars (not just self driving cars) have been doing for a while now (in higher end cars).
The thing that puts me off a Tesla (other than the owned by a nazi who bought his way into government thing) is that the fatality rate is double the average, and the weird doors that unless you have been explicitly shown the emergency handle, you're trapped inside after an accident because the normal door opening latch loses power as part of requirements to not electrocute emergency personnel.
The Cybertruck is scarier, because the emergency personnel will struggle to break a window to get you out or use the jaws of life to cut you out on account of the armoured doors and bullet proof windows.
over_clox
in reply to Dave • • •Sometimes, brakes are not the way.
Sometimes, steer the wheel hard left or right real quick to avoid a side impact.
I guess AI hasn't ever lived a day in the real world...
Dave
in reply to over_clox • • •The benefit to cars auto braking is that cars can start braking a second before a person, with a much quicker reaction period. Plus we saw in your video how many people driving are paying attention 😅.
But this is not an argument for self driving, cars can and do have this function with the driver also paying attention for the best of both worlds.
over_clox
in reply to Dave • • •I've been in a situation before where braking would have been the worst idea.
Like a split second later and I would have slammed into the side of the dude that backed out in front of me.
But I realized that very quickly and decided not to hit the brakes at all. I just quickly jerked my steering wheel to the left, which minimized the damages to the corners of our bumpers.
Ask AI to do that kind of maneuver on the fly and it'll totally fuck up, because AI doesn't actually know how to drive..
Dave
in reply to over_clox • • •I still think auto braking is better than nothing. Remembering cars have ABS and you'd still be able to steer around as needed. Presumably the car would let you override by pressing the accelerator.
over_clox
in reply to Dave • • •I'm being perfectly honest here, I tend to have very fast reaction time behind the wheel. But you're right, not everyone has fast reflexes in an emergency pinch like that.
Still, I'm not about to wait on the lag of computer chips and shit to just have to guess if the vehicle is going to respond the way I'm trying to control it.
I don't want lag, I want 100% realtime control.
Hell, I'm a nerd and I don't trust chips.
Edit/Addendum: I prefer older model vehicles that weren't built with spyware...
rumba
in reply to JoelJ • • •Best I've seen so far is organic maps. It's very good on local It shows you all the building numbers around you which is kind of nice. However it does not work well on long trips. And more than once I've had to download fairly large blocks of extra tiles if I'm not on an interstate.
To get you back and forth to a doctor or a dentist or a couple of towns over it's fabulous.
Thomas
in reply to JoelJ • •You can also try MagicEarth from PlayStore
DeGoogle Yourself reshared this.
pogmommy
in reply to Thomas • • •Thomas
in reply to pogmommy • •Which OS are you using on your smartphone?
DeGoogle Yourself reshared this.
pogmommy
in reply to Thomas • • •Thomas
in reply to pogmommy • •Then one could also argue and say that grapheneos is not good because it is based on Aosp, which is developed by Google.
DeGoogle Yourself reshared this.
SomeAmateur
in reply to JoelJ • • •For most people Organic Maps is the move.
I love OSMand and it has become my digital pin board of places I've been to over the years. It can do a lot (for example I have a preset with sat imagery and a transparent topo map overlay for hiking) but it can be clunky, and a lot of cool stuff is hard to find and change in the menus.
DogEarBookmark
in reply to SomeAmateur • • •starlinguk
in reply to SomeAmateur • • •I love OSMand. It does exactly what a map should do. It doesn't have these weird user unfriendly quirks that Here and Google Maps have that make them harder to use.
I just have one problem with it, it gives some directions via notifications instead of voice, for some reason, which is baaaad when you're driving.
Lør
in reply to JoelJ • • •solrize
in reply to JoelJ • • •JoelJ
in reply to solrize • • •snail_stampede
in reply to JoelJ • • •blayd
in reply to JoelJ • • •JoelJ
in reply to blayd • • •Cyborganism
in reply to JoelJ • • •I used MapFactor many times during trips.
You can either download free maps from OSM or paid maps from... I think it's TomTom? Or is it Garmin? I forget, I've never used them.
Anyway the interface ain't that friendly, but there's a LOT of points of interests, and there's live traffic if you have internet access. It has a few cool features too. It can be used via Android Auto and can even use your phone screen's reflection on your windshield as a HUD!
The only caveat is you have to download the maps and they can take a lot of storage space depending how large an area you need.
Edit : yeah it's TomTom
iturnedintoanewt
in reply to JoelJ • • •Gevian
in reply to JoelJ • • •kindenough likes this.
untorquer
in reply to JoelJ • • •Zenokh
in reply to untorquer • • •arch
in reply to JoelJ • • •werefreeatlast
in reply to JoelJ • • •NeedyPlatter
in reply to JoelJ • • •