Petition in Germany to recognize unpaid contribution to free and open source software projects as 'society-beneficial volunteering' (ehrenamt)!
This will give volunteering for e.g. @postmarketOS , @freifunk , @kde , @nextcloud , @Mastodon and other libre projects the same legal status as taking care of an elderly family member or volunteering for a youth association, which provides tax benefits and relaxes requirements for receiving unemployment benefits.
Interested people may sign it using one of the two following links.
The petition in german language: openpetition.de/petition/onlin…
The petition in english language: openpetition.de/petition/onlin…
News article (German): heise.de/news/Petition-Open-So…
News article (English): heise.de/en/news/Petition-Open…
The petition is organized by @webvision.
If you're not a resident of Germany, go ahead and use this thread to organize similar initiatives in your country of residence.
#deutschland #foss #floss #volunteer #ehrenamt #freiwilligkeit #openSource #freeSoftware
Open-Source-Entwickler fordern Gleichstellung mit Vereinsarbeit
Eine Petition fordert, ehrenamtliche Arbeit an Open-Source-Software rechtlich wie klassisches Ehrenamt zu behandeln – mit steuerlichen Vorteilen.Moritz Förster (iX Magazin)
like this
reshared this
4censord bc100 arc
in reply to papiris • • •papiris
in reply to 4censord bc100 arc • • •@4censord I don't know, are citizens' initiative petitions required to be on the bunds platform, in order to legally force a discussion in the bundestag?
I found the petition here, there may be additional context: blackneon.net/post/64526
4censord bc100 arc
in reply to papiris • • •while on any other platform there is no such thing
so they could just ignore it in that case
papiris
in reply to 4censord bc100 arc • • •@4censord oooh very important aspect!
According to openpetition there does seem to be a mechanism regarding that, which encompasses more online petitions than those on the bunds platform.
I'm not well versed in german legalese (ich spreche und schreiben scheiss deutch auch), could you give it a read? openpetition.de/blog/blog/2017…
Das Quorum auf openPetition « openPetition – Blog
openPetitionMarcus Müller
in reply to papiris • • •it just says there's a number for how many signatures you need for openpetition to request a statement from a responsible authority. In this case, from members of parliament
The idea is that that number is high enough for it to be significant to their constituency, i.e., ignoring the openpetition request **might** have measurable influence on their outcome.
Nothing relevant to the parliamentary process in Germany.
papiris reshared this.
papiris
in reply to Marcus Müller • • •@funkylab @4censord glad you had a look and chimed in!
In that case, the petition will have stronger leverage if it gets moved to the bund petition platform. Luckily the petition just started, so moving it now wouldn't be a devastating loss (4000 signatories so far, so still a significant setback).
Is this the official bunds petition platform? petitionsportal.de/
I have very little knowledge about the democratic process in Germany (and meetings tomorrow in both the workers' coop me and others are organizing and datakollektivet.no), so it would be awesome if someone (maybe you? 😀 ) could contact the organizers of the petition to bring up these concerns and suggest moving the petition to the place where it'll legally force a debate in the bund.
Deutscher Bundestag - Gemeinsames Petitionsportal des Bundes und der Länder
Deutscher Bundestag - Gemeinsames Petitionsportal des Bundes und der LänderMarcus Müller
in reply to papiris • • •@4censord yes, specifically epetitionen.bundestag.de/ ; do contact the petitionsausschuss maybe; they can decide to deal with a petition even if formal requirements aren't met, afaik.
I'll not be available to help you.
Petitionen: Verwendung von Cookies nicht aktiviert
epetitionen.bundestag.dewebvision
in reply to Marcus Müller • • •Florian Schmidt
in reply to papiris • • •openpetition.de/blog/blog/2018…
@4censord
Einreichen garantiert! « openPetition – Blog
openPetitionwebvision
in reply to 4censord bc100 arc • • •papiris
in reply to webvision • • •@webvision @4censord oooh, you're the organizer! Awesome initiative Boris!
It has already spread to Denmark: infosec.exchange/@nieldk/11563…
If you've got acquaintances in Denmark who'd be interested in this, maybe point them there?
@webvision @4censord oooh, you're the organizer! Awesome initiative Boris!
It has already spread to Denmark: infosec.exchange/@nieldk/11563…
If you've got acquaintances in Denmark who'd be interested in this, maybe point them there?
PhreakByte the Octopus
2025-11-30 13:16:04
Aiono
in reply to papiris • • •papiris
in reply to Aiono • • •@aiono I don't know, but as far as I can tell, residents can sign the petition.
If I understand correctly, non-german citizen people outside Germany can sign as well, it's just that their vote won't count towards the necessary 'quorum' to force a discussion about the petition in the german bundestag / federal assembly.
Mein deutch ist schlecht, please read details on openpetition: openpetition.de/blog/blog/2017…
Das Quorum auf openPetition « openPetition – Blog
openPetitionPaul_IPv6
in reply to papiris • • •love it!
i've always been a fan of breaks for folks doing things of public benefit (forgiveness of student loans, tax credits, etc.) and maintaining FOSS is very much a public benefit.
papiris reshared this.
Fell
in reply to papiris • • •My wife brought an interesting argument to this topic: She is not opposing this, not at all, but she argued that technically not the whole community would benefit from open source because often in practice open source is more of a hobbyist niche. KDE, for example, isn't something your neighbour would care about.
I do kind of agree, but I also think this is changing rapidly and more people are interested in learning about open source.
Daniel Bohrer
in reply to Fell • • •@fell well, to be honest, also not a lot of people care a lot about the Kleinkleckersdorf e.V. soccer club. That doesn't mean that it's useless per se.
@papiris @postmarketOS @freifunk @kde @nextcloud @Mastodon
Geert Uytterhoeven
in reply to Fell • • •schuelermine; probably → 39C3
in reply to papiris • • •papiris
in reply to schuelermine; probably → 39C3 • • •Because the organizer of the petition (@webvision) wasn't aware of the official bundestag epetition platform (epetitionen.bundestag.de/) at the start:
mastodon.social/@webvision/115…
mastodon.social/@webvision/115…
Petitionen: Verwendung von Cookies nicht aktiviert
epetitionen.bundestag.dewebvision
2025-11-30 19:11:12
papiris
Unknown parent • • •@mirabilos
Because the organizer of the petition wasn't aware of the official platform at the start: mastodon.social/@webvision/115…
webvision
2025-11-30 19:11:12
Ant
in reply to papiris • • •Andreu Casablanca 🐀
in reply to papiris • • •Ajinkya Dahale
in reply to papiris • • •papiris reshared this.