Apparently Meta is afraid of Pixelfed. Clearly, @dansup is doing something right. Can't imagine a bigger compliment.

"CONFIRMED: Facebook has *banned* anyone from linking to Pixelfed. #metablockingpixelfed"

bsky link: bsky.app/profile/did:plc:n2okv…

h/t @ajsadauskas (see bsky screenshot in reply below)

Maybe tech media should pick this up. Seems like a good story!

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to Mastodon Migration

And some confirmation here:

mastodon.social/@dansup/113813…

Edit: Actually, this seems like the first report, and the post above a confirmation. It seems another user mentioned pixelfed.de in a FP post and it did not get blocked, so maybe it is just the .social domain. Will continue to update with any new info.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to Mastodon Migration

German media now has the story...

Thanks to @ajsadauskas here is a first example of German media picking up the story of Meta blocking links to Pixelfed:

social.heise.de/@heiseonlineen…

link to article: heise.de/en/news/Unprecedented…

Will update if and when there is any US tech media story, but don't hold you breath.


"Unprecedented" growth: Facebook blocks links to Instagram alternative Pixelfed

Pixelfed is growing rapidly after Meta changed content moderation. It's now noted that Facebook is blocking links to Pixelfed.

heise.de/en/news/Unprecedented…

#Facebook #Instagram #MetaPlatforms #SocialMedia #news

This entry was edited (1 year ago)

UkeleleEric reshared this.

in reply to Mastodon Migration

Cool!

404 Media @404mediaco now has the story of how Meta is blocking links to Pixelfed!

404media.co/meta-is-blocking-l…

"Meta is deleting links to Pixelfed, a decentralized Instagram competitor. On Facebook, the company is labeling links to Pixelfed.social as β€œspam” and deleting them immediately."

This entry was edited (1 year ago)

Mastodon Migration reshared this.

in reply to Mastodon Migration

testing this now. Yes its ttue. I tried 3 times, it got removed every time (labelled as spam). The first time I didnt even use a full link, just 'pixelfed.social'.

update2: Tried again, this time it worked, writing a longer post and putting the words in apostrophes.

Update3: we tested it in comments and my friends worked but when I commented back, it was removed again. See screenshots.

UPDATE 4 THE LAST PIXELFED LINK TEST HAS NOT BEEN REMOVED.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)

reshared this

in reply to Mastodon Migration

this smells slightly fishy (but just slightly) because like, that post is so concise and there's not a smidgen of legitimate concern you could find to justify what an algorithm might've thought was wrong with it. it's difficult to attributes ignorance to what only resembles pure malice. and I feel that if they genuinely want to silence this kind of stuff, they wouldn't be sending notifications like this admitting to it. because holy shit that looks bad for them.

has anyone else reproduced this result? i don't want to believe it just at face value from one person because, despite how much I may hate facebook, I do genuinely think they would be more competent at hiding their actions than depicted.

in reply to Mastodon Migration

in reply to Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au

And given another user had already complained about their link to Pixelfed being blocked (that's the whole reason I tried replicating it!), we can rule out that this was an isolated incident.

So the Facebook algorithm was definitely blocking links to pixelfed.social.

(Which is why I chose to begin my post with the word CONFIRMED. Because I'd independently confirmed the earlier post.)

Very best case scenario, whoopsies! The Facebook algorithm was accidentally blocking links to a competitor without human intervention.

Not a great look, given Zuckerberg's interview the same day and Meta's recent monopoly antitrust cases.

And worst case scenario, there was human intervention because someone within Meta (not necessarily senior) got jumpy about people talking about a competitor.

Either way, not a great look for Meta.

(2 of 2)

This entry was edited (1 year ago)

reshared this

in reply to Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au

in reply to Dmitry Borodaenko

@sodiboo And if you're wondering whether that could be illegal under EU's Digital Markets Act, looks like Zuck also believes it could be:
politico.eu/article/zuckerberg…

"The U.S. government under incoming President Donald Trump should intervene to stop the EU from fining American tech companies for breaching antitrust rules and committing other violations, Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg said late Friday."

in reply to Michel Lind

@sodiboo looks like it’s resolved for now... the official reason, take it as you want, is β€œa mistake”

engadget.com/social-media/meta…

in reply to flere-imsaho πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

@sodiboo there are numerous examples of facebook censoring anything they deemed critical of facebook – especially news articles (most recent case is the 404's reporting on zuckerberg's fuckery), and also anything they considered a competition at the time.

@dansup @mastodonmigration @ajsadauskas

in reply to Mastodon Migration

Meta claims in the fine print users consent to the right of Meta to use users' photos for whatever reasons they want, including commercial use. I don't post my photos on Meta (Facebook) for that reason, but I understand the "free and fair use" law for my photos posted elsewhere. Meta likely fears losing photographers moving to Pixelfed.
in reply to Mastodon Migration

When I last (for the very last time) tried to post anything on facebook it was to share a Mastodon post. It was instantly removed. I appealled it but don't know if anything happened because it was the last straw for me with that site. Still, reluctantly, have their messenger because some people important to me are slow to shift.
in reply to Mastodon Migration

Not FB, but maybe related enough to be of interest. I posted a screenshot of an Apple Note to my IG account a few days ago in which I softly encouraged people who saw the post to follow my Pixelfed account. The post is still there and a few people have seen it (as many as would normally see a post of mine without any hashtags) so at least META isn't doing OCR on IG images yet.
in reply to Mastodon Migration

I've had similar on completely different non-sensitive topics, when the post consisted of only a few words.

I think that - for whatever reason - very short status updates are detected as spam by the automatons, even though a human would know otherwise.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to Mastodon Migration

I've had a lot of posts deleted for strange reasons there. I've taken to going back to 1337 for some words or putting / in the middle of words to avoid the censors there. The word "vaccine" got one post bounced. It's nuts. They do not like links. Many have started putting the link in the comments. So far that seems to be working. Even local news has had to do it.
in reply to πŸŽ“ Doc Freemo πŸ‡³πŸ‡±

@freemo I can personally confirm thst "this user" β€” i.e. me β€” only attempted to post it once.

As a regular Facebook post.

I've documented what happened in greater depth elsewhere.

But basically there was another user who posted that they had tried to post a link to Pixelfed on Facebook and were blocked.

To verify their claim, I tried writing a simple post on my newsfeed asking "Anyone here use Pixelfed?" with a link to Pixelfed dot social.

My last interaction on the site was in July 2024, so definitely no spamming in terms of volume.

Within 3 seconds, I got an automated response.

Jason Koebler from 404 Media tried the same thing, and got the same result: 404media.co/meta-is-blocking-l…

A number of other tech news sites, including Engadget, began running the story: engadget.com/social-media/meta…

At this point, Meta acknowledged it had been blocking links to Pixelfed "by mistake". It no longer seems to be doing it 😊

⇧