Skip to main content

in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

Any people reading this who rely on Discord: this is your nudge to consider moving elsewhere.

Where? I don't know. What I do know is that whatever alternative I suggest, you will find a myriad of reasons why it just "won't cut it."

But I also know that if resources were spent on making the hard-to-enshittify decentralized platforms better, they would get better, while still remaining hard to enshittify.

So, perhaps it's worth it to trade some short-term convenience for long-term resilience. 🤷‍♀️

in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

I am not on Discord, and I have no intention of ever setting up an account. I got fooled once or twice by centralized platforms, but I learned my lesson and I am going to avoid being fooled again if at all possible.

And you know what? It is really quite possible. :blobcatcoffee:

If more people made a similar decision, it would be even easier. Every little bit counts.

We really refuse to understand how much power we actually do have as far as saying "no" to abusive technologies is concerned.

This entry was edited (5 days ago)

reshared this

in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

I agree with this in principle, but is there a decentralized equivalent of Discord/Slack? I hope there is. I'm unaware of any though.
in reply to Gold

@unifex I already said I am not going to offer an alternative.

They do exist though.

@Gold
in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

If you know of a decentralized version of anything, and you rally against centralized things, why would you not recommend decentralized alternatives?
in reply to Gold

@Gold
in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

@unifex somehow people prefer to spend time coming up with reasons why not to switch, than finding ways to make the switch work in the imperfect world we inhabit.

So I am not going to dive into that kind of discussion.

Instead, I am pointing out that Discord is a proprietary, centralized, VC-funded platform that is starting to enshittify – so that people get a nudge to try to find their own solutions. For those that can't be bothered to do that, me offering suggestions would not help either.

@Gold
in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

Yeah, I can understand the desire to not dive into some conversations like that. Started a separate post asking for alternatives. 😀
in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

We could really use a properly federated open version of Discord actually now that you say it.
in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

I think it's inevitable that people will make such decisions. It may take a long time, but people will learn. That shit just isn't sustainable. Natural selection will do it's work here too.
in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

besides being proprietary, it really lacks for knowledge sharing. Clearly it wasn't built for it. Slack (also proprietary) at least has proper search and threads.
in reply to Philip

@oilheap Slack is also shit for knowledge sharing. People need to stop using Slack as a documentation tool.

Actually, people need to stop using Slack, fulls top. *sigh*

in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

What is the FOOS software that can best do what discord does? (This question also applies to Facebook Groups) Mainly making it very easy to create chat, file-sharing and posting spaces, to delegate moderation (many content creators use this "honor" masterfully ... but also in a way that makes me give them side eye about the free parasocial fueled labor)

Qualms aside is there any contender for a best replacement?

in reply to myrmepropagandist

in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird the main one to me was always matrix, with matrix's big selling point over irc that its an easier switch from discord
in reply to myrmepropagandist

@futurebird #mattermost does a lot of the stuff Discord does and is F/LOSS. It's been buggy lately, but usually it works well so I'm hoping they will fix the issues soon.
in reply to myrmepropagandist

#RevoltChat is a pretty good, FOSS, Discord clone (with a timely name). It's not as full-featured as Discord, and it is occasionally buggy (mostly just struggling to keep up with the demand of people switching to it from Discord).

However, the UI/UX is very similar. Almost no learning curve.

Oops ... edit to add: revolt.chat/

@rysiek

This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

to be completely honest, I have expected the enshittification to go way faster than that - like I would expect Discord to get to this point like 3 or 4 years ago.
in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

I mean, the enshittification was going on for a while already, with nitro nagging, quests on desktop client (thankfully easy to disable lul), and quite a few other annoyances - the only surprising part is the relatively slow tempo of this going on.

It would definitely be nice to have something decent enough for larger communities - like I guess there is Matrix but I have heard quite a few horror stories about it. At least for a Reddit and trad forums replacement there is kbin and lemmy which I heard work decently well, and for more public social media there is masto/akko/*key stuff - but for instant messaging things seem to be in major pain, which makes me sad.

in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

I don't think ads work. People have been showing me car ads daily since I stopped driving in the 1980s and I haven't bought a car yet. That's a lot of advertising with absolutely zero effect. Just one data point.
I'm also not buying plush toilet rolls. They clog up my loo and it's a right pain to unclog it, so it's budget buys, despite all the adverts.
in reply to Cabbidges

@TheDailyBurble
The point of ads (from large companies) is to create needs. Easiest way to do so is to trigger survival instict: humans are a social animal, so being separated from herd is a death sentence.

If ads don't work on you, it's due to you not being their target segment. They're then easy to ignore. That's why large part of marketing is targeting: that the right people (eg. victims) see the ad.

Ads work. If they didn't, they wouldn't do it. And the cost for society is high.

in reply to Juho Mäntysalo

@iju
I'm not convinced they do work, would need to see solid sales delivery, rigorously researched. I think they can make people aware of products. I'm certainly aware of cars, but I suspect it's diminishing returns beyond that.
Even in a willing segment, inattention to what people want defies any amount of shouting at them to buy. I prefer toilet paper that doesn't clog up my loo, so avoid the plushy stuff.

I was a marketing manager in an earlier life, amongst other of my career.

in reply to Cabbidges

@iju
The fantasy ads are whale-sales, short term impulse buyers. The (far) bigger market is people who are looking for a product that addresses their needs at a reasonable price.

To get from A to B, I'm never going to need a Tesla (simplifying) but a few percent of people think they do, so you can overprice and underdeliver on that. For a short while.

in reply to Cabbidges

@TheDailyBurble
We may be speaking past each other. I was talking of products on saturated markets such as cola-drinks or clothes. Also in general international companies are badly in touch with the needs of local populace, so they find it easier to change needs.

I've worked in marketing as well (briefly), but more importantly have two degrees that border the subject.

in reply to Juho Mäntysalo

@iju Cool. I was going to add there's an irritation factor to advertising - people don't like being nagged and just blank out or it induces avoidance behaviour eg ad blockers, or muting channels until the ad has gone. The internet is far from the captive audience people fondly imagine it to be.

Again on a small datapoint, Netflix kept pushing Jeremy Clarkson at me. I don't care how much they overpaid for the series, it was so annoying I unsubscribed and have never been back.

Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Eric the Cerise

@zanagb

I suppose that's up to you. Never occurred to us to try, and I like self-hosting.

@futurebird @rysiek

in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

yeh, totally wasn't coming when they brought in unique display names and gave all the good ones to advertisers
in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

And of course, it's one of those platforms where even companies are starting to switch things to it where users are expected to be required to have an account on it to receive support and such.

But what ticks me off the most are various open source projects and the like using it for their support. I've even seen some that declared they would ignore any issues reported on their actual repository (which admittedly is often centralized and requires an account too, but at least usually is more open than Discord) and only accept messages through Discord.

in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

I detest Discord. I have several local user's groups that insist on using it, when a public web forum (with optional registration) would be so much better.
in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

I've been nagging my friends to let me talk to them elsewhere for years.

I never trusted it, especially after the response I got when I asked them to deal with harassment which started at a server which one of the trust and safety team founded.

Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
smlckz
I've deleted my toot. I've also deleted all my toots of explanatory nature. Please withdraw your accusation. I promise to refrain from explaining from now on.
This entry was edited (5 days ago)