The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.
Right in the middle of a rainy moment, a tiny bird becomes the star of something truly magical—a perfect water droplet lands on its head, forming a crown-like splash that feels almost unreal. The timing is flawless, capturing a split second where nature turns playful.
The photo was taken by Lee Schofer and posted by his partner, Kate Weyer, on her Facebook.
#NaturePhotography #Plant #Plants #Flower #Flowers #Animal #Animals #Wildlife #WildlifePhotography #Photographer
x.com/Sci_Nature0/status/20458…
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
like this
reshared this
Jeff
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Claudia Zahn
in reply to Jeff • • •@cynical13
Absolutely! 😂
lankohr
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •oscarfalcon
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Jonny Clark
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •MakerBlock
in reply to Jonny Clark • • •Marianne
in reply to Jonny Clark • • •Claudia Zahn
in reply to Marianne • • •@noodlemaz @BelfastRoadster
x.com/Sci_Nature0/status/20458…
2045886932463304729
Science & Nature (X (formerly Twitter))Marianne
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •@BelfastRoadster I'm not assuming it is AI. Just agreeing with the comment that one of the worst things about #genAI is calling all kinds of otherwise cool and awesome things into question in our minds.
I hate that that's a thing now.
Especially when it comes to birbs
Edit to add - the reasons I do question this one are because the droplet, even though it's broken, seems to make no impact on the head feathers, which wouldn't be solid. The bird's eyes unreactive. The fact the named photographer didn't post it themselves. The text is also suspect.
Marianne
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Clarissa
in reply to Marianne • • •Cloaca Maxima
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Psyche
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •The feet along with the branch, the shadows and light simply don't match, hard to notice if you are not trained that alone is enough to tell.
Ibly 🏳️⚧️
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •posting AI slop is one thing, but posting it and then attributing to people who don’t fucking exist is another. what the fuck is wrong with you?
i genuinely believed in this just because you attributed people, i guess i need to do my due dillegence now to make sure people exist, because chucklefucks like you are willing to lie about it so your AI slop gets 500 internet points.
Claudia Zahn
in reply to Ibly 🏳️⚧️ • • •@EeveeEuphoria
Oh. Really. 😂
Ibly 🏳️⚧️
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •alright, now why don't you actually link to the photo they took, instead of being coy?
even disregarding the potential of this being AI slop, it's a dick move to post someone else's photo, and *not* link back to where you found it, especially when it's fucking impossible to browse facebook if you don't have an account.
but hey, while you're at it, explain the literally impossible physics phenomena, where the rain drops in the background are somehow still falling, while the foreground raindrop isn't a blurry mess?
Claudia Zahn
in reply to Ibly 🏳️⚧️ • • •Because the photo is private now.
And what's about you're ridiculous "mimimimimimi these persons don't exist mimimimimi"?
Moe Lassus
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Henryk Plötz
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Simon | שִׁמְעוֹן
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Gegenwind 🇺🇳🖖
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •nice! What prompt die you use?
🤪
petur 😶🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼
Unknown parent • • •Albert Hickey
Unknown parent • • •@pycomtois @luckychronic @BelfastRoadster
As a bit of fun I searched for the photographers name and nothing came up related to this image. Then queried Co-pilot and Gemini if this is AI and both AI agents said it's AI.
Gemini's analysis. Again, may not be accurate but....
Still, a cool artistic image, but sad it's not real.
Pierre-Yves Comtois
Unknown parent • • •Tabby Schaf🇺🇦❤️🖤
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Claudia Zahn
in reply to Tabby Schaf🇺🇦❤️🖤 • • •@Tabby_Schaf
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha 😂
WINNER 🏆
Nexy
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •But yeah, its AI, the drops are not consistente and the imagen is too static and center, the drop dont have movement but the drops in the back yes.
Also that drop is too big is like of the size of a coin, not real lol
Claudia Zahn
Unknown parent • • •@dusepo
Yes, it is, and I hope it's not AI.
But even though it's AI, it made my day.
MvRiederberg
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Claudia Zahn
in reply to MvRiederberg • • •@mavori
Ich persönlich glaube nicht, dass es KI-generiert ist. Ich bin der Meinung, dass es aus einem Video stammt.
MvRiederberg
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Claudia Zahn
in reply to MvRiederberg • • •@mavori
Ich habe keine Ahnung, wie sich Wassertropfen auf Gefieder verhalten. Ich nehme mal an, das Gefieder ist wasserabweisend.
Bisher wurden fünf Checks durchgeführt und es steht 2,5:2,5.
mastodon.social/@makerblock/11…
mastodon.social/@hans_zelf@mas…
Mastodon
mastodon.socialMakerBlock
2026-04-20 15:54:43
MvRiederberg
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Naja. Erstens: Physik – ich weiß, nicht beliebt. Aber hilfreich.
weltderphysik.de/gebiet/materi…
Zweitens: Wildtierfotograf namens Lee Schofer? Unbekannt.
Muss nicht AI sein – könnte auch Photoshop sein. Aber definitiv nicht real.
Tropfendynamik
www.weltderphysik.deClaudia Zahn
in reply to MvRiederberg • • •@mavori
Ah ja.
instagram.com/leeschophotograp…
Instagram
Instagram08/15 R.I.P. Natenom🖤
in reply to MvRiederberg • • •@mavori
@Adrenochrome
1. Für Tropfenfotos braucht man Lichtschranken und schnelle Blitze. Im Auge des Rotkehlchen spiegelt sich normales Licht von oben, kein (Outdoor)Blitz.
2. Vögel sind schnell in der Reaktion. Hier sitzt ein völlig entspanntes Rotkehlchen, obwohl im gerade ein (Größenvergleich) Liter auf den Kopf geprallt ist?
Entweder der Vogel ist ausgestopft und das ist eine aufwendige Studioaufnahme, oder es ist KI.
Claudia Zahn
in reply to 08/15 R.I.P. Natenom🖤 • • •@OhWeh
Ich glaube, es ist ein Standbild aus einem Video.
08/15 R.I.P. Natenom🖤
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Nein, habe ich gerade oben erklärt.
Ich bin ausgebildeter Fotograf und ich habe mich mit Tropfenfotos beschäftigt.
08/15 R.I.P. Natenom🖤
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Claudia Zahn
Unknown parent • • •@hans_zelf @winkleink @pycomtois @luckychronic @BelfastRoadster
Could it be that this was taken from a high-rated video? What do you think?
Hans Zelf 🇪🇺🌻
in reply to Albert Hickey • • •aiphotocheck.com/
AI Image Detector - Free AI Photo Detection Tool
AI Photo CheckClaudia Zahn
Unknown parent • • •@dusepo
After five checks it's 2,5:2,5
mastodon.social/@makerblock/11…
mastodon.social/@hans_zelf@mas…
Mastodon
mastodon.socialMakerBlock
2026-04-20 15:54:43
Jo Dusepo جوهانا دوسپو
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •RedAlert (Michael)
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Linkstrickliesel
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Claudia Zahn
in reply to Linkstrickliesel • • •@Linkstrick
da ist alles andere weit weg, oder 🥰
Linkstrickliesel
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Oder Gegenvorschlag: Jeder, der Atomstrom nutzt, baut sich in den Keller ein kleines Endlager. Und wenn das nicht dicht ist, macht es Puff.
FinchHaven sfba
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Betting that all the Reply Guys saying this image is AI are *loads* of fun at parties
Who seriously cares?
Except the bros that always have to be The Smartest Little Boys in the Room?
Marianne
in reply to FinchHaven sfba • • •@FinchHaven those of us who appreciate photography, wildlife, physics even, care. AI is filling our information ecosystem with garbage. Misinformation spreading is part of the fascist project. When we can no longer believe our eyes and ears, bad actors thrive.
Yep it's 'just' a pic of a bird with some made up splash bullshit. But the fact this is the kind of rubbish we see daily now is a real problem and something people are right to be angry about. #genAI #AIslop
DFX4509B (Joshua Mason)
in reply to Marianne • •@Marianne @FinchHaven sfba @Claudia Zahn
I'm never going to use AI in my content.
FinchHaven sfba likes this.
FinchHaven sfba
in reply to Marianne • • •Perhaps a little personal backgrounder is in order
I have +25 years as a professional digital still and video photographer
I've used Adobe Creative Cloud's Adobe Lightroom, Adobe Premier Pro, and Adobe Audition to post-process tens of thousands of Canon CR2 RAW photos, and unedited video
I have some sense of what is real photography, what is AI butchered photography, and what has been created by AI alone
And again, I say, who the fuck *really* cares about something like this?
It's clearly for fun
Maybe everyone let a little whimsy into your lives and stop feeling like you have tell other people where they're wrong
Save your Smartest Little Boy schtick for something important, mkay?
cc @Adrenochrome
Claudia Zahn
in reply to FinchHaven sfba • • •@FinchHaven
I have zero experience with photography and video, not analog, not digital. I just want to share beautiful pics of nature and architecture, or whatever. Thank you for your words.
FinchHaven sfba
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Yeah, I mean, that's exactly where I am
I love photos -- no, strike that: images -- and simply love something new and entertaining
And, as I just posted to another thread, a whole hell of a lot of #AI experts simply seem to have never heard of Adobe Photoshop
I'm so old I can remember when the goto put-down gotcha! tag was "'shopped!!!"
Now people with no clue see anything unusual and it's all with the "AI!! AI!! AI!!'
Claudia Zahn
in reply to FinchHaven sfba • • •@FinchHaven
... and filter! Filter! Filter! 😂
ersus
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Rue Mohr
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Ingrid_DemokratinAusOL
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Lyn
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •hey, just fyi y'all can use the Google SynthID watermark checker to verify that this was AI-generated.
deepmind.google/technologies/s…
SynthID
Google DeepMindreshared this
Lord Caramac the Clueless, KSC reshared this.
Cassandrich
in reply to Lyn • • •@lynatic Asking the slop machine to tell you if something was produced by the slop machine. 🤦
All it's going to do is what it always does: give you an "answer" that sounds plausible.
Lyn
in reply to Cassandrich • • •@dalias typing @SynthID in a Gemini message forces a SynthID tool call to execute before the LLM runs. The LLM receives the output from the SynthID checker (a very normal old-school program) + your message as context.
Of course the LLM could still randomly decide to lie about the result of the tool call, that's why I ran this and similar queries multiple times in different chat contexts.
To answer why I'm using an LLM to do this at all: There simply seems to be no other way to reliably use the SynthID checker (sometimes the Google reverse image search executes it and notifies you of a positive but sometimes it also doesn't) , this is the only supported way by Google (even tho I still consider it bad design).
Cassandrich
in reply to Lyn • • •Dan
in reply to Cassandrich • • •Claudia Zahn
Unknown parent • • •@devnull @hans_zelf @winkleink @pycomtois @luckychronic @BelfastRoadster
"And that "Lee Schofer" photographer is nowhere to be found on the web… 🤔"
You just have to look for it.
instagram.com/leeschophotograp…
Instagram
Instagram🐧DaveNull🐧 ☣️pResident Evil☣
Unknown parent • • •@hans_zelf Well… Platforms such as Mastodon delete metadata.
This is more likely AI slop or made up in some photo editing software… The bird would react if they got a big drop of water on her head and it would not form a symmetrical crown.
It would form a ring… on a flat surface/water container, not on a curved surface such as a head
And that "Lee Schofer" photographer is nowhere to be found on the web… 🤔
@Adrenochrome @winkleink @pycomtois @luckychronic @BelfastRoadster
Hans Zelf 🇪🇺🌻
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Paweł Pyś 🧩
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •Paweł Pyś 🧩
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •/\w*(bim)\w*/g
in reply to Claudia Zahn • • •