Hashtags do not replace groups.
No one moderates them. They’re easy to hijack and spam. And there’s simply no permanence to them.
Which is why, if you actually want to discuss something, it’s better to tag a group. For example, if you want to be part of an actual PC gaming community on the Fediverse, it’s better to tag @pcgaming@lemmy.ca than #pcgaming.
This needs to be common knowledge because people new to the Fediverse do not know about groups. Hell, I’d say people who have had Mastodon accounts for years still don’t know. And that’s a shame.
Adam likes this.
reshared this
CoolMcCool
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •TBH I think a lot of people (including me) have a very sketchy idea of how the different bits of the Fediverse link together... I'm still a bit vague about how my #Mastodon and #Pixelfed accounts could work better together.
There's a lot of *assumed knowledge* about the #Fediverse ... and people don't want to ask 'stupid' questions because they don't want to 'look stupid'. There needs to be easily accessible and explicit step by step instructions *to get people started*.
Where could I find a group about #ux or #humancentredesign for example? Or #photography ?
JWcph, Radicalized By Decency reshared this.
Chris Trottier
in reply to CoolMcCool • • •@Coolmccool The best way to explain #Pixelfed is that it’s an Instagram-like front-end for the Fediverse. But practically speaking, it’s Mastodon if pictures were a requirement on Mastodon. You interact with a Pixelfed account from Mastodon in much the same way you interact with another Mastodon account, or how you’re interacting with my Akkoma account right now. It really is just like email.
Regarding group topics, the best way to find them is to do a search on a place like lemmy.world or lemmy.ca. For example,
uiux@programming.devis one. And you can find the URL here:programming.dev/c/uiux
Adam likes this.
reshared this
CoolMcCool and Lazarou Monkey Terror 🚀💙🌈 reshared this.
JWcph, Radicalized By Decency
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •CoolMcCool reshared this.
Chris Trottier
in reply to JWcph, Radicalized By Decency • • •@jwcph @Coolmccool The best way to understand the Fediverse is not as a collection of servers but instead as actors that implement activities.
You are an actor. A Lemmy community is an actor. A bot is an actor. An app is an actor.
All these things do certain activities. One activity is to like a post. Another activity is to repost.
And all these apps like Mastodon are just presenting these actors/activities in a certain format.
Hope that explains things.
CoolMcCool reshared this.
JWcph, Radicalized By Decency
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •CoolMcCool reshared this.
Chris Trottier
in reply to JWcph, Radicalized By Decency • • •No, those concepts aren’t for everyday users. It’s for developers. For the same reason a homeowner doesn’t need to know the ins and out of architecture, an everyday user does not need to know about the architecture of the Fediverse.
Nevertheless, it’s how ActivityPub works—and I will go more in depth in a future thread for those who want to know.
CoolMcCool reshared this.
JWcph, Radicalized By Decency
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •CoolMcCool reshared this.
Chris Trottier
in reply to JWcph, Radicalized By Decency • • •@jwcph @Coolmccool To be blunt, “it’s like email” is probably good enough for 95% of casual users in terms of an explanation for how the Fediverse works.
It’s all just email. Mastodon, Pixelfed, and Lemmy are really all just email.
But the moment you ask, “Well, actually, how does it all work? How is it possible to use Lemmy with Mastodon?”
The answer is: actors.
And maybe that is abstract, but I assure you that’s the practical reason you’re able to do it. Once you understand that the Fediverse is made up of actors/activities, a whole new world of possibilities opens up—even for regular users. It’s why you’re participating on Lemmy right now, even though it still looks like “Mastodon” to you.
Now I’m sorry that you may perceive this as “beside the point,” but
... Show more...@jwcph @Coolmccool To be blunt, “it’s like email” is probably good enough for 95% of casual users in terms of an explanation for how the Fediverse works.
It’s all just email. Mastodon, Pixelfed, and Lemmy are really all just email.
But the moment you ask, “Well, actually, how does it all work? How is it possible to use Lemmy with Mastodon?”
The answer is: actors.
And maybe that is abstract, but I assure you that’s the practical reason you’re able to do it. Once you understand that the Fediverse is made up of actors/activities, a whole new world of possibilities opens up—even for regular users. It’s why you’re participating on Lemmy right now, even though it still looks like “Mastodon” to you.
Now I’m sorry that you may perceive this as “beside the point,” but people ask how it works and I’m telling you. However, if this is too abstract, remember: it’s all “email”.
CoolMcCool reshared this.
JWcph, Radicalized By Decency
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •@Coolmccool That's not what people are asking - they're asking "How does it work *for me*?".
"Like email or phones" again still only explains in the abstract, that you can connect with anyone in the same way as those things. It still doesn't explain how to use it or how it solves the things people would like to solve.
People are asking for a driver's license & you're telling them how a combustion engine turns gasoline into mechanical motion.
Chris Trottier
in reply to JWcph, Radicalized By Decency • • •@jwcph @Coolmccool I’ve explained how to use it: you submit to a group from Mastodon by tagging. In fact, you’re using it right now. Look at one of the accounts you’re mentioning.
Did you not read the original post?
JWcph, Radicalized By Decency
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •CoolMcCool reshared this.
Yohan Yukiya Sese Cuneta 사요한 🧇
in reply to JWcph, Radicalized By Decency • • •If you're a content creator:
If you're a content consumer:
A. Use whichever software, platform, server, community, service, and/or app you prefer
B. Follow the people you want to follow regardless of which software, platform, etc. they are on
C. You don't have to create-yet-another-account
Of course, for content creators, they prefer to use different platforms for specific purposes and features. So, they still will end up with multiple accounts. However, №2 and №3 still applies to them.
And for the content consumers, it won't matter, just follow all the other accounts of the content creator they like using one account.
That's how it works for most.
If we put it into context.
In #Instagram, many "influencers" report and ban fol
... Show more...If you're a content creator:
If you're a content consumer:
A. Use whichever software, platform, server, community, service, and/or app you prefer
B. Follow the people you want to follow regardless of which software, platform, etc. they are on
C. You don't have to create-yet-another-account
Of course, for content creators, they prefer to use different platforms for specific purposes and features. So, they still will end up with multiple accounts. However, №2 and №3 still applies to them.
And for the content consumers, it won't matter, just follow all the other accounts of the content creator they like using one account.
That's how it works for most.
If we put it into context.
In #Instagram, many "influencers" report and ban followers who:
These "influencers" assume their followers are inactive, useless, or accounts meant for scamming and spamming them later. They don't care if your are a legitimate fan, even a donator, who created-yet-another-account just to follow them.
With the Fediverse, and any #OpenSocial / #OpenSocialWeb / #SocialWeb network for that matter, it solves that problem. "Influencers" can have silly criteria all they want without risking kicking out legitimate fans because their fans are more likely using an account regularly because it's their "main" account, not yet-another-account.
@atomicpoet @fediverse @Coolmccool @jwcph
deegeese
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •Communities are for Lemmy and hashtags are for Mastodon.
They each make sense in their proper context.
Chris Trottier
in reply to deegeese • • •@deegeese Communities are not exclusive to any one platform: you can use Lemmy with Mastodon, and many people do.
Group actors are now an ActivityPub standard.
nikkiana
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •I've mostly been on the Mastodon corner of the Fediverse, and I think you're right... this isn't wildly known and/or has been explained poorly.
I've had the sense there's more to groups on the Fediverse, but nobody's really mentioned where to find high quality active groups and how to interact with them outside of the ones on a.gup.pe.
Chris Trottier likes this.
Chris Trottier
in reply to nikkiana • • •@group@exampleserver.com.nikkiana
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •Chris Trottier
in reply to nikkiana • • •⁂ Jnk ∞ 📎
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •@nikkiana I, for one, would definitely love that. Started reading this thread thinking I knew how the fedi worked and now I feel lost again. After using lemmy, pixelfed, and mastodon I assumed lemmy was just doing weird shit to be more like reddit, but groups are a thing? How are they different from a user or a hashtag? How are they created and moderared? If mentioning the group makes me publish there, how is is joined, following the "account"? So groups are like auto-boost bots?
Sorry if it's too many dumb questions, we definitely need better guides for this. Seems like a useful feature wasted
Chris Trottier
in reply to ⁂ Jnk ∞ 📎 • • •@jnk @nikkiana I’m going to explain this in a future thread, but in the meantime, the best place to start is here:
codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src…
fep/fep/1b12/fep-1b12.md at main
Codeberg.orgElectroVagrant
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •The tricky part is, the group-supporting fediverse software and the microblogging software need to improve how they interact for this to be as good as it could be.
Right now Mastodon barely supports group users/actors/accounts, however they're called, translating stuff from Lemmy's format in a rather clunky way. Meanwhile Lemmy also has to roughly translate Mastodon's format to its own, working pretty well all things considering, but leaving clear artifacts (subject line/first line repeating, community mention remaining shown, etc.).
Chris Trottier
in reply to ElectroVagrant • • •BenDoubleU
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •Chris Trottier
in reply to BenDoubleU • • •@BenDoubleU But again, a big reason I recommend groups over hashtags is because you can remove spam from a group, whereas with a hashtag, you cannot.
So… will that increase spam? Not if moderators actually do their jobs.
Adam likes this.
BenDoubleU
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •atomicpoet
in reply to BenDoubleU • • •\
It’s not “throwing the onus onto someone else.” The onus has always been on us.
The Sleight Doctor 🃏
in reply to atomicpoet • • •@atomicpoet @BenDoubleU I feel it's worth pointing out in this context that from the perspective of a Masto server, this thread features several accounts with no avi, bio, follows or followers. I assume they're the Lemmy accounts?
As a Twitter vet I've developed an aversion to engaging *at all* with newly-created accounts lacking properly fleshed-out profiles!
But it's still cool there's these options. Perhaps the integration will improve?
Adam
in reply to The Sleight Doctor 🃏 • •The Sleight Doctor 🃏 likes this.
The Sleight Doctor 🃏
in reply to Adam • • •@breakfastmtn Thanks. So far I've tried Friendica, Misskey and Hubzilla, as well as three different Mastodon servers. So I do understand that Masto is not the whole fedi.
It's just that so far as I was concerned, "Lemmy" is a dead rock star who had a penchant for Nazi memorabilia.
I'd never heard of it as a fedi service until Chris' post, yesterday! 🤷♂️
Adam likes this.
Adam
in reply to The Sleight Doctor 🃏 • •@The Sleight Doctor 🃏 You should check it out. Lemmy's great! Interoperability is terrific but I think the way information and discussion are displayed in Lemmy* is superior for deeper dives and being "in" a discussion. Not at all a knock on Mastodon, which is perfect for what it is. They're just trying to be different things that have different strengths 😀
like this
The Sleight Doctor 🃏 and Fitik like this.
The Sleight Doctor 🃏
in reply to Adam • • •@breakfastmtn Thanks for the tips! I'm always looking to "spread out" my online presence. Been stung before by entrusting way too much to one service, then having to abandon all my hard work overnight.
That's why I'm here. 😊
Adam likes this.
Chris Trottier
Unknown parent • • •Chris Trottier
Unknown parent • • •@nikkiana But this is why people have to be trained out of their mental models away from how social media is supposed to “work”.
I’m someone who writes long posts all the time. When I started, people complained. Now everyone who follows me expects to see long posts.
Basically, it should be assumed that a post that appears on Mastodon may not be from Mastodon. And Mastodon should make that assumption apparent.
m3t00🌎
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •Chris Trottier
in reply to m3t00🌎 • • •m3t00🌎
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •Chris Trottier
in reply to m3t00🌎 • • •Melancholic Mediocrity
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •Chris Trottier
in reply to Melancholic Mediocrity • • •Melancholic Mediocrity
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •TisI
in reply to Melancholic Mediocrity • • •Melancholic Mediocrity
in reply to TisI • • •alster
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •Also it whould be neat to somehow see from the handle itself if it's a group or not. It's the case with the classic å.gup.pe, but I can't derive that from lemmy.ca without having to look it up.
I also find it father difficult to find groups, because the default ActivityPub-Search doesn't work that way and groups are just special users.
That's why I like a.gup.pe, it sounds a bit like Gruppe in german. Which doesn't help internationally, something like gro.up oder a subdomain including group whould be helpful and make the seqrch for groups easier, because then it's part of the name.
@fediverse
Guppe Groups
a.gup.pemapto
in reply to alster • • •alster
in reply to mapto • • •crossgolf_rebel - kostenlose Kwalitätsposts
in reply to alster • • •I think this is also more of a comprehension problem in the Fediverse or the mastodons that are closing themselves off
If you always think a little outside the box, then #lemmy is already a term.
That's what happens when you shorten communication about the Fediverse to ‘mastodon only’, it excludes so much that would help
alster
in reply to crossgolf_rebel - kostenlose Kwalitätsposts • • •crossgolf_rebel - kostenlose Kwalitätsposts likes this.
crossgolf_rebel - kostenlose Kwalitätsposts
in reply to alster • • •@atomicpoet@atomicpoet.org@fediverse@lemmy.world@mapto@masto.bg
Maruno Ulfdrengr
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •Chris Trottier
in reply to Maruno Ulfdrengr • • •katy ✨
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •Chris Trottier
in reply to katy ✨ • • •@cupcakezealot Take a look at this post on Lemmy:
lemmy.world/post/26015431
Chris Trottier
Unknown parent • • •Alien_Sunset
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •unknown1234_5
in reply to Chris Trottier • • •Chris Trottier
in reply to unknown1234_5 • • •