The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.
What better way could there be to resist?
like this
reshared this
What better way could there be to resist?
What better way could there be to resist?
⇧
Flaming Cheeto
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •ginger🫰... 🎶🌻
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •Jordi (Spherical Queirdo)
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •Darwin Woodka
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •derptron
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •Jordi (Spherical Queirdo) reshared this.
Hermannus Stegeman
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •So..
Polly Kraisus
in reply to Hermannus Stegeman • • •Polly Kraisus
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •But it makes perfect sense given that it touches (1) hating on destructive tech industry projects, (2) planting trees and (3) birbs.
Ozzie D, NP-hard
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •buherator
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •zbrown
in reply to buherator • • •buherator
in reply to zbrown • • •Polly Kraisus
in reply to buherator • • •Heath Borders
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •Polly Kraisus
in reply to Heath Borders • • •🇨🇦🇩🇪🇨🇳张殿李🇨🇳🇩🇪🇨🇦
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •My dread is that this will be used as an excuse to remove protections, not stop data centres.
NEVER underestimate the ability of the rich to be evil.
Billy Smith reshared this.
Abolisyonista
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •DFX4509B (Joshua Mason)
in reply to Polly Kraisus • •You think Big Tech's gonna care? They got the money to pay off the fines if they develop there anyways. Money is why Big Autos can skirt pollution laws and get off with a slap on the wrist while if small tuning shops try it, they're fined out of business (Christ, our legal system ain't fair in the slightest). What's stopping the same logic from being used by Big Tech?
Plus, Big Tech can just pay to get protections removed or weakened as others on this thread have said.
Shit, you know how speech opposing AI datacenters is protected by the First Amendment? Big Tech could pay to get those protections weakened or stripped too.
like this
Juho Mäntysalo and buherator like this.
Polly Kraisus
in reply to DFX4509B (Joshua Mason) • • •Nanook
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •Polly Kraisus
in reply to Nanook • • •Ben. No, not that one.
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •reshared this
Polly Kraisus and серафими многоꙮчитїи reshared this.
Polly Kraisus
in reply to Ben. No, not that one. • • •a1
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •Will Deakin
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •as, in the UK special protected status is given to village greens, campaigners will look to block development by having an area of land declare a village green.
Also bats, don't go mithering bats. That has significant penalties associated with it.
FoolishOwl
in reply to Polly Kraisus • • •It's a good idea, but people will have to prepare for the likely counterattack in which data centers get waivers or they just outright ignore the law.
But there's also a very good chance that the "AI" bubble bursts first and then you've helped endangered plants.
Tu nube seca mi río 🐌
Unknown parent • • •@iakobsdesamos
La vimos y nos hizo ilusión, pero tiene un par de pegas.
En los sitios que conocemos ya tienen naturaleza.
Que una zona tenga la categoría "industrial" no quiere decir que no exista ya naturaleza.
En los propios planes lo reconocen, y entonces las autoridades aún así están dando como positivos los planes de evaluación ambiental.
Lo bueno de la propuesta es que obliga a la gente a conocer físicamente las zonas afectadas. Darse cuenta lo cerca que están de la poblaciones, y que ya tienen naturaleza previa.
Pero mil gracias por avisar, hazlo siempre:)
Polly Kraisus reshared this.