The SAVE act targets people who've changed their name *for any reason*. Ya know who's done that?
- Married women
- Trans & nonbinary folx
- Immigrants
You know which US citizens that leaves?
Mostly white men.
The SAVE act isn't trying to save anything other than patriarchy and fascism.
@amydiehl mstdn.social/@amydiehl/1160089โฆ
SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesnโt match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
thepersistent.com/this-bill-inโฆ
Trump has renewed pressure for the Senate to pass the SAVE Act, which requires proof of citizenship to vote. For the 69 million women who have changed their last name this would create a barrier to voting.
Kathleen Davis (The Persistent)
DFX4509B (Joshua Mason)
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • •Francisca Sinn likes this.
ใใใชใ็ใใ [semi-hiatus]
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •canleaf08โ ๅ ๆฟๅคง่ๅญ ๐ณ๏ธโ๐โง๏ธ๐ช๐บ๐
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •็ ๆผ ไบบ x ๐๏ธ
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •Patch You Up
in reply to ็ ๆผ ไบบ x ๐๏ธ • • •It also confuses people that our son has her last name. We did that mostly because her last name is far more interesting/unique than mine.
๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ)
in reply to Patch You Up • • •@Jumpmed when I disowned my dad, I changed my last name to my mom's (she had kept hers, and her name was way cooler anyway).
@sleepytako @amydiehl
Shannon Clark
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •@shansterable also (and while it shouldnโt matter this might sway some folks) Catholic nuns, monks and priests - up to and including the Pope who often take new names when they take their vows.
(My aunt has been a Catholic nun for over 60 years - we in the family know her under one name. But her public name under which she has written books, led centers for the environment at universities and been a longtime lobbyist to Congress is her name she took when she took her vows)
The Lady (La Donna) reshared this.
Claus Cramon Houmann
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •Eggs now in different baskets.
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •That also means the end to witness protection schemes.
How do you deal with an asylum seeker without papers? There is no birth certificate or passport to be found particularly in countries where civil society and the system of keeping of public records has broken down.
๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) reshared this.
Zimmie
in reply to Eggs now in different baskets. • • •@the_wub People with new identities courtesy of witness protection get birth certificates for their new names.
Very few countries allow asylum-seekers to vote in national elections at all, regardless of how well-documented they are. If one becomes a US citizen, they get a certificate of naturalization, which is explicitly listed as acceptable proof of citizenship in the bill.
This proposed law is awful, but those two specific concerns arenโt affected either way.
Eggs now in different baskets.
in reply to Zimmie • • •@bob_zim I have had a collection of experiences, related to the different way that the UK and most other European countries treat identity.
Some countries base your permission to stay on your birth certificate and others on the passport you present.
In my case the names on the two are not the same.
The UK demands that if you have two passports then the names on both must be identical.
But UK passports do not support accented characters found in other European alphabets.
Zimmie
in reply to Eggs now in different baskets. • • •Eggs now in different baskets.
in reply to Zimmie • • •@bob_zim Before Brexit happened if there had been an "EU passport" I would have applied for it immediately.
Identity is a pain in the neck. In the UK you can choose the name that appears on your passport.
In the Netherlands and Norway people are all registered in the People Registers. So you get the name that you are officially registered with when you apply for a passport.
The UK has a perculiar way of dealing with legal identity and has no central register for all people.
Eggs now in different baskets.
in reply to Eggs now in different baskets. • • •@bob_zim I have no idea how this is managed in the US though.
Is your legal identity registered at federal or state level?
Or not at all?
Zimmie
in reply to Eggs now in different baskets. • • •@the_wub Births are registered at the local level (county/parrish, below US state), but they confer citizenship at the federal level. The US federal government is the entity which issues passports and social security numbers (basically our national ID number for financial purposes). Driver licenses and most other non-passport IDs are managed by the US states. Depending on who is asking for identity and why, we may need a birth/naturalization certificate, passport, social security number, driver license/state ID number, or a paper utility bill (sometimes needed to prove residency for state and local elections).
US states run their own elections, so rules for voting are all over the place (which is why the USA doesnโt meet the minimum standards for election monitoring by the Carter Center).
Eggs now in different baskets.
in reply to Zimmie • • •@bob_zim "SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. "
So where and how is a person's "legal name" recorded?
In the UK there is the concept of "known as" which means that you can end up being called something other than is on your passport.
You can change the name on your passport without changing your legal name by deed poll to match it.
Not advisable as I found out trying to help a relative but I believe even now it is still possible.
Eggs now in different baskets.
in reply to Eggs now in different baskets. • • •Zimmie
in reply to Eggs now in different baskets. • • •@the_wub “Legal name” in this case is talking about the voter registration. We register to vote at the US state level. The registration involves name and address (to determine which county, city, town, etc. elections we vote in). We get a registration card (mine arrived two days ago) which lists all of the information about which districts we vote in, and we’re added to the voter rolls available to polling places.
Since US states run their own elections, they all have different rules about how to determine who someone is so they can use their ballot. Many have been adding photo ID requirements, and the name on the photo ID has to match the name on the voter roll. This proposed law is saying beyond just a photo ID, you also have to prove you’re a citizen using documentation with a name which matches the photo ID and the voter registration.
A passport is both a photo ID and proof of citizenship, so it fills both requirements. Everybody else would nee
... Show more...@the_wub โLegal nameโ in this case is talking about the voter registration. We register to vote at the US state level. The registration involves name and address (to determine which county, city, town, etc. elections we vote in). We get a registration card (mine arrived two days ago) which lists all of the information about which districts we vote in, and weโre added to the voter rolls available to polling places.
Since US states run their own elections, they all have different rules about how to determine who someone is so they can use their ballot. Many have been adding photo ID requirements, and the name on the photo ID has to match the name on the voter roll. This proposed law is saying beyond just a photo ID, you also have to prove youโre a citizen using documentation with a name which matches the photo ID and the voter registration.
A passport is both a photo ID and proof of citizenship, so it fills both requirements. Everybody else would need to bring a birth/naturalization certificate. When people change their names, they often donโt go down to the county registrarโs office to get a new copy of their birth certificate. They usually just keep the original one and a copy of the name change documentation, as thatโs enough for everything else we use a birth certificate for.
Itโs ultimately a poll tax, just like the photo ID requirement. Blatantly unconstitutional, but we have an illegitimate Supreme Court.
Eggs now in different baskets.
in reply to Zimmie • • •@bob_zim We had a poll tax in the UK at the end of 1980s/early 1990s. Implicit in the law was that it would force people to remove themselves from the electoral roll in order to avoid paying the tax.
The only good that came out of it was that the opposition to the tax forced the resignation of Prime Minister Thatcher - an odious pro-Pinochet, neo-liberal, monetarist, Reaganite.
So maybe this tale gives some hope for you folks in the US.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poll_taxโฆ
Poll tax (Great Britain) - Wikipedia
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)Eggs now in different baskets.
in reply to Eggs now in different baskets. • • •@bob_zim More recently another UK scandal related to legal identity and nationality in the form of the "Windrush scandal".
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windrushโฆ
Windrush scandal - Wikipedia
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)Zimmie
in reply to Eggs now in different baskets. • • •@the_wub A lot of the US is heavily racist. After slavery was limited to prisoners, states used a variety of techniques to prevent Black people from voting. Poll taxes and poll tests (literacy tests, civics tests with biased answers) were favorites. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 explicitly made poll taxes illegal for federal elections. The Supreme Court of the United States also declared poll taxes unconstitutional in 1966.
Incidentally, the literacy tests are where the terms โgrandfather clauseโ and โgrandfathered inโ come from. Many states allowed a man to skip the literacy test and vote if his father or grandfather had voted before 1867, a date selected to exclude most Black men.
reshared this
the esoteric programmer and Daniel โ reshared this.
yPhil
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •Ya know who's done that?
- Married women
- Trans & nonbinary folx
- Immigrants
No. A lot of plain criminals do that, too. It's a real problem.
๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ)
in reply to yPhil • • •@yPhil there's already a law against being a criminal, that's what made them a criminal. There are also already laws against election tampering and fraud.
Two states let felons vote while in prison.
If they've "paid their dues", then most places (eventually) let them vote again anyway.
Blocking upwards of a third of the population from voting because it might stop a handful of "criminals" is fucking ridiculous. If we wanted to do *that* and have fewer false-positives, we could just block straight men from votingโthey make up ~93% of inmatesยนโand that's with the fact that queer folx have arrest rates ~2.3ร higher than straight peopleยฒ (because the system is fucking busted).
Also, your argument is bullshit.
ยน prisonpolicy.org/reports/beyonโฆ
ยฒ prisonpolicy.org/blog/2021/03/โฆ
@amydiehl
Visualizing the unequal treatment of LGBTQ people in the criminal justice system
Alexi Jones (Prison Policy Initiative Blog)yPhil
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ)
in reply to yPhil • • •I'm not your honey, nor did I say "only" anywhere in my post. I even included "mostly" just to head off diversionary comments like yours.
You seem to be putting words in my mouth while intentionally missing the point of my original post.
But maybe if you walk me through it in baby steps, using smaller words I'll understand, then we can engineer this thing together, sweetheart.
@amydiehl
yPhil
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •Thank you for your kind answer, no srsly ; so OK (in retrospect baby steps can sound condescending, it's actually not but I'm sorry if it... Nahh, you understood) so OK, we're on the same page.
Name changing is a problem, in a society basically based upon it. I'm not talking social credit here, I'm talking basic secular rules. You are supposed to be able to ask about/search the registers/google the person in front of you and know who they are. Can we agree on that?
๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ)
in reply to yPhil • • •@yPhil I don't think we are on the same page though, as I don't see name changing as the problem. In fact, I don't care what anyone's "real" name is. Of all my friends both online and in person, I only know the name on the birth certificate of *maybe* five or six—for *everyone* else, I only know what name they've asked me to call them. Some of them have changed the name they've asked me to call them, some have done so multiple times. Hell, I think there are less than half a dozen living people who know me who have any idea what my "real" name is. And it has never mattered.
Many of the things I do: political and social activism, suicide prevention outreach, being a niche internet micro-celebrity, creating adult content, I can only do effectively because people *don't* know who I am or where I live (and vice versa). I got fucking death threats for calling for a Tesla boycott, and again for talking about gun control, and again for talking about queer community building, and so on.
... Show more...@yPhil I don't think we are on the same page though, as I don't see name changing as the problem. In fact, I don't care what anyone's "real" name is. Of all my friends both online and in person, I only know the name on the birth certificate of *maybe* five or sixโfor *everyone* else, I only know what name they've asked me to call them. Some of them have changed the name they've asked me to call them, some have done so multiple times. Hell, I think there are less than half a dozen living people who know me who have any idea what my "real" name is. And it has never mattered.
Many of the things I do: political and social activism, suicide prevention outreach, being a niche internet micro-celebrity, creating adult content, I can only do effectively because people *don't* know who I am or where I live (and vice versa). I got fucking death threats for calling for a Tesla boycott, and again for talking about gun control, and again for talking about queer community building, and so on. If I could be easily searched up, then I couldn't do what I do, because I'd receive violence at the hands of some pissed off, entitled, man.
tl;dr: we could solve the "prove who you are" issue in ways that don't conveniently target and disfranchise women and minorities right before midterm elections.
sOlOw-NH
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ)
in reply to sOlOw-NH • • •ruivo
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ)
in reply to ruivo • • •@ruivo I'm a US citizen, as were my parents, and their parents, going back about as long as there's been a US.
I didn't take my spouse's name when I got married, but my birth certificate doesn't match my state ID or passport. I legally changed my name shortly after I became an adult, so I could get rid of my dad's last name (and my first name, because it was dumb).
At the time, I didn't have enough money to pay to update it everywhere, so I just never did.
I have a valid state ID and passport (well, my state ID has a nonbinary gender marker on it, so who knows if it'll be honored outside of Washington state ๐คท๐ผโโ๏ธ these days).
By the wording of the SAVE act, I don't think I'd be eligible to vote (for the first time since I turned 18).
@amydiehl
ruivo
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •ruivo
in reply to ruivo • • •๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ)
in reply to ruivo • • •@ruivo ๐ซ
@amydiehl
Savera
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •Lenora
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ)
in reply to Lenora • • •@FaithinBones they should already do that ๐
But more importantly, we should call out this legislation for what it isโan attempt to lock out non-MAGA voters and rig an election.
@amydiehl
Lenora
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •Space Hobo
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •The "married women" thing may surprise some people who haven't worked out all the arithmetic on this yet. After all, aren't the right wing always obsessed with traditions such as women taking on their husband's family name?
The whole point is that they'd streamline the edits to the birth certificate along with marriage certificates, and then make the reverse change extremely difficult so as to interfere with divorce proceedings.
reshared this
Dr. Sobek reshared this.
ChloChlo
in reply to ๐ ฐ๐ ป๐ ธ๐ ฒ๐ ด (๐๐ฆ) • • •