Accusations of #plagiarism or #AI use in writing must be supported by a preponderance of credible evidence, not em-dashes and vibes and how things sound to someone's ear.

The burden of proof rests with the person making the accusation. THE BURDEN OF PROVING INNOCENCE DOES NOT REST WITH THE AUTHOR. This standard must apply equally to all writers.

Defending due process is not the same as defending misconduct, and it is important.

#writingcommunity

Unknown parent

I agree that AI detection should be approached cautiously. As a Book Editor & Story Consultant, I think the stronger question is not simply whether a tool labels something as AI-generated, but whether there is credible evidence behind that conclusion. Authorial voice, stylistic patterns, and textual consistency can provide valuable context, but they should be examined carefully rather than treated as absolute proof. @CT Liotta
Unknown parent

@CT Liotta I understand what you mean. I think that’s exactly why human writing, editing, and storytelling may become even more valuable as AI-generated content becomes more common. When everything can be produced instantly, authenticity, voice, intention, and craft become what distinguish one piece of writing from another. As a Book Editor & Story Consultant, that’s something I care deeply about.
Unknown parent

Exactly. Story is so much bigger than prose. Character, structure, conflict, pacing, emotional stakes, and the choices behind the narrative all contribute to what makes a story work. As an editor, I think those elements become even more important when we look beyond the surface of the writing.
@CT Liotta
Unknown parent

@RaymondPierreL3 I strongly believe that the dogmatic anti-AI stance in most of the creative community is harmful. I don’t want to discount the genuine harm various forms of LLMs cause. Are LLMs use for edit checks any worse than traditional grammar checks? I don’t understand that position. They’re also useful tools for development tasks— research and brainstorming come to mind.

By being dogmatic, we ensure nobody listens to the underlying real concerns.

Unknown parent

That’s a fascinating way to approach writing. I especially like what you said about magic realism and noticing the ā€œmagicā€ in everyday life. Your two novel ideas sitting quietly in your files sounds like they’re simply waiting for the right moment.

As for me, I’m Johnson. I’m a writer, Book Editor, and Story Consultant, so I spend a lot of time around manuscripts, stories, and the creative process. I also work with authors on developing and refining their stories, which is something I genuinely enjoy.

And yes, you’re probably not overlooking anything with my profile. I’m still getting everything organized here, so I appreciate you pointing that out. šŸ˜„

I’d actually be interested to hear about one of those magic-realism stories you’ve written. What kind of everyday ā€œmagicā€ do you usually find yourself writing about?

Unknown parent

That’s a fascinating way to approach writing. I especially like what you said about magic realism and noticing the ā€œmagicā€ in everyday life. Your two novel ideas sitting quietly in your files sounds like they’re simply waiting for the right moment.

As for me, I’m Johnson. Book Editor, and Story Consultant, so I spend a lot of time around manuscripts, stories, and the creative process. I also work with authors on developing and refining their stories, which is something I genuinely enjoy.

And yes, you’re probably not overlooking anything with my profile. I’m still getting everything organized here, so I appreciate you pointing that out. šŸ˜„

I’d actually be interested to hear about one of those magic-realism stories you’ve written. What kind of everyday ā€œmagicā€ do you usually find yourself writing about?

⇧