Ssshhh. You know who will want to bring back the old style aerosol cans with CFCs and legacy refrigerants in automobile air conditioning because he doesn’t believe the science.
This entry was edited (Friday, August 28, 2026, 1:33 PM)
@tragivictoria @crazyeddie We watch the monitoring feeds nervously down in NZ because it affects our rates of skin cancer and cataracts. It just about skins over and then reopens for a while on a seasonal basis at the moment
Did you know that the same guy invented CFCs and leaded gasoline? Thomas Midgley, Jr. possessed "an instinct for the regrettable that was almost uncanny"
Hey remember when Matt Walsh said that superstupid thing about the ozone hole disappearing on its own. Can we similarly fix that problem and eliminate dumb ignorant wind bags, too?
@jameshowell I tried to explain it to a dude here and he just said "that's what they want you to think". I asked him who was trying to make me think that... And to no ones surprise that's when it got horribly antisemitic
I think this worked because there was a known solution to the problem, and the solution involved selling people more stuff (like, everyone should buy a new fridge!). Capitalism is great at making people buy more stuff. It's nothing like the climate crisis, because that requires us to make / consume / produce *less* things.
@nilclass A big difference is that it didn't affect current manufacturers. The people who made refrigerators that used CFCs only had to make and sell a DIFFERENT kind of fridge, but they still got to make and sell them. In fact, they got to enjoy HIGHER sales. The industries responsible for the problem were also the solution.
It's different for fossil fuels. You can't convert an oil derrick to a solar farm. Regulation of CO2 is bad for them, so obviously they resist it.
About the same time there was an acid rain crisis caused by flaring at oil wells and refineries plus increasing use of diesel fuel containing sulfur. We dealt with that too. Flaring is restricted and in most places low-sulfur diesel is mandatory. Unfortunately politicians worldwide decided they couldn't seriously tackle fossil fuel emissions.
"Guy could have looked it up on #wikipedia but chose to ask the Internet a stupid question in the form of an accusation instead." Can we have a meme-word for that, please?
@jerrej He knew the answer. This is what conservatives do. Frank Wilhoit's essay about this explains why. They're after POWER, that's it, and to hell with other people. Any lie that advances their goal is justified in their mind for that reason. He knew that his OWN followers didn't know better. That's all this is about. "Hey, remember that BS about the ozone layer? Same BS now about climate change!" He knows. He has no shame about it.
To be fair, he probably can't make a living any other way.
@Halaana For many of them, that comes too late. A lot of anti-vaxxers begged for vax when they were being put on a ventilator -- long after it was too late for them. Then wondered why they were denied. They never understood, and often their surviving family didn't either, and think there's some kind of conspiracy against them. Because I guess that's easier than the hard task of learning Reality. Or having to admit you were wrong.
We should really do the same with fossil fuels and global warming. We know we can do it because we've done it before with the ozone layer and also acid rain.
@shaknais @scbarton as a fridge person, HCFC22 is a particularly useful substance. HFC23 is a by-product. Whilst R23 has no ozone depletion potential, it does have a global warming potential around 14000 kg•CO2 equivalent. At least coal is slowly being replaced as the power source for production. Unfortunately, R22 production has a much bigger impact than "only" the ODP.
R22 is a prolific intermediary for the production of many fluoropolymers. PTFE, of which Teflon is a trade name for a particular blend, is a particularly ubiquitous example known to most people. There are many more.
Some countries are still producing vast amounts of R22. Article 5 countries have until 2030 to phase it out under the schedule. As a refrigerant, it is readily available in many countries the world over despite the Montreal Protocol and future amendments. It is hard to believe it won't persist beyond 2030.
I remember answering an exam question at 7th grade, I answered that the Ozone layer can be fixed, but the teacher substracted 2 marks from me, saying it's irreversible.
I want those two marks back!
This entry was edited (Friday, August 28, 2026, 9:30 PM)
@LPerry2 @jirpok Acid rain is another good example for the same class of problems, being solved by the same process. Also both problems were solved without real impact to the lifes of 99.9% of people: Hairsprays & fridges changed, & now all cars use unleaded fuel. But that's all, normal consumer life went on. Unfortunately, it's not *that* easy to fix the climate catastrophe, but after those 2 miraculous experiences in the past, ppl are expecting another wonder, no painful & costly changes.
bouriquet
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •Danny Boling ☮️
in reply to bouriquet • • •@bouriquet
maga's will start selling cans of *only* CFCs, just for kicks.
@jd
The ol' tealeg 🐡
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •Dr Andrew A. Adams #FBPE 🔶 reshared this.
Danny Boling ☮️
in reply to The ol' tealeg 🐡 • • •@tealeg
Same here.
My response is always the same: I know because I was there.
@jd
derptron
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •Victoria :3 🏳️⚧️🇵🇸
in reply to derptron • • •Hedgewizard 🐈
in reply to Victoria :3 🏳️⚧️🇵🇸 • • •@tragivictoria @crazyeddie
We watch the monitoring feeds nervously down in NZ because it affects our rates of skin cancer and cataracts. It just about skins over and then reopens for a while on a seasonal basis at the moment
stats.govt.nz/indicators/ozone…
Ozone hole | Stats NZ
www.stats.govt.nzWorkshopshed
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •reshared this
GailWaldby@bsky.social❌👑 reshared this.
kralcttam ☕️
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •Did you know that the same guy invented CFCs and leaded gasoline? Thomas Midgley, Jr. possessed "an instinct for the regrettable that was almost uncanny"
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_M…
Thomas Midgley Jr. - Wikipedia
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)Pascale_PH reshared this.
Ariaflame
in reply to kralcttam ☕️ • • •Duckbilled Plattypus.
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •Yrjänä Rankka 🌻
Unknown parent • • •James Endres Howell
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •Jens
in reply to James Endres Howell • • •I tried to explain it to a dude here and he just said "that's what they want you to think". I asked him who was trying to make me think that... And to no ones surprise that's when it got horribly antisemitic
James Endres Howell
in reply to Jens • • •@ohyran Bah
Don't punch these guys, violence never works. Seriously. That's why I lust for withering-ridicule-vengeance
@jd
clew
in reply to James Endres Howell • • •I’d be as happy with plain but very short. Gets though to more people, IME.
@jameshowell @jd
James Endres Howell
in reply to clew • • •@clew I am not judging by the criterion of civic efficacy, but by my lust for vengeance
@jd
Niklas
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •It's nothing like the climate crisis, because that requires us to make / consume / produce *less* things.
Bytebro 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 🌈
in reply to Niklas • • •Kind of boils down to the old capitalist thing about "Buy more shit, or we're all fucked!", no? 😀
WesDym
in reply to Niklas • • •@nilclass A big difference is that it didn't affect current manufacturers. The people who made refrigerators that used CFCs only had to make and sell a DIFFERENT kind of fridge, but they still got to make and sell them. In fact, they got to enjoy HIGHER sales. The industries responsible for the problem were also the solution.
It's different for fossil fuels. You can't convert an oil derrick to a solar farm. Regulation of CO2 is bad for them, so obviously they resist it.
Phil Thane ✅
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •reshared this
GunChleoc and Cainmark Does Not Comply 🚲 reshared this.
The pigtailed girl
in reply to jd 🔆 • •like this
GailWaldby@bsky.social❌👑, Bonaventure Software 🇨🇦, jd 🔆, Alessandro Corazza 🇨🇦, Cainmark Does Not Comply 🚲 and Viejadelagua like this.
Cainmark Does Not Comply 🚲 reshared this.
Truth Before Reconciliation
in reply to The pigtailed girl • • •Cainmark Does Not Comply 🚲 reshared this.
Raymond Russell
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •Kevin Russell
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •Matt Walsh has a kink.
Matt Walsh wants everyone to know how base and stupid he is.
And WOW Matt Walsh is Stupid.
jer
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •WesDym
in reply to jer • • •@jerrej He knew the answer. This is what conservatives do. Frank Wilhoit's essay about this explains why. They're after POWER, that's it, and to hell with other people. Any lie that advances their goal is justified in their mind for that reason. He knew that his OWN followers didn't know better. That's all this is about. "Hey, remember that BS about the ozone layer? Same BS now about climate change!" He knows. He has no shame about it.
To be fair, he probably can't make a living any other way.
Halaana
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •This is like the people that claim the Y2K bug was a non-issue. Not much happened because people did the work preventing it.
Some people just need to be repeatedly slapped in the face by reality until they accept something needs to be done about it.
WesDym
in reply to Halaana • • •WesDym
Unknown parent • • •Kōtare
Unknown parent • • •Trieck or gaank
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •Margret Kuarell
in reply to Trieck or gaank • • •scbarton
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •Ok, but the ozone hole is only stabilized. In other words, it's still there.
ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov
goedelchen
in reply to scbarton • • •p
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •Martijn Vos
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •@jd 🔆
We should really do the same with fossil fuels and global warming. We know we can do it because we've done it before with the ozone layer and also acid rain.
Piranhallama
Unknown parent • • •@shaknais @scbarton as a fridge person, HCFC22 is a particularly useful substance. HFC23 is a by-product. Whilst R23 has no ozone depletion potential, it does have a global warming potential around 14000 kg•CO2 equivalent. At least coal is slowly being replaced as the power source for production. Unfortunately, R22 production has a much bigger impact than "only" the ODP.
R22 is a prolific intermediary for the production of many fluoropolymers. PTFE, of which Teflon is a trade name for a particular blend, is a particularly ubiquitous example known to most people. There are many more.
Some countries are still producing vast amounts of R22. Article 5 countries have until 2030 to phase it out under the schedule. As a refrigerant, it is readily available in many countries the world over despite the Montreal Protocol and future amendments. It is hard to believe it won't persist beyond 2030.
PurpleGengar
in reply to jd 🔆 • • •I remember answering an exam question at 7th grade, I answered that the Ozone layer can be fixed, but the teacher substracted 2 marks from me, saying it's irreversible.
I want those two marks back!
Gins
in reply to PurpleGengar • • •M Schommer
in reply to Gins • • •Well, it's people who can't be fixed. Taking away those 2 marks was wrong!
M Schommer
Unknown parent • • •Acid rain is another good example for the same class of problems, being solved by the same process. Also both problems were solved without real impact to the lifes of 99.9% of people: Hairsprays & fridges changed, & now all cars use unleaded fuel. But that's all, normal consumer life went on.
Unfortunately, it's not *that* easy to fix the climate catastrophe, but after those 2 miraculous experiences in the past, ppl are expecting another wonder, no painful & costly changes.
Cookiefiend
Unknown parent • • •