As has been discussed throughout this series of articles that has been looking at the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and in particular the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at educational institutions that are located across all three levels of the Australian education system (whether the educational institution in question is located at the primary, secondary, or tertiary level of the Australian education system), the history of the various relationships that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea (whether the relationship in question was diplomatic, economic, business-to-business, or people-to-people) had been an important variable when it comes to the level of Korea literacy that exist among, not only among members of the general Australian populace, but also the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at educational institutions that are located across all three levels of the Australian education system, and in particular educational institutions that are located at the tertiary level of the Australian education system. However, and this was also discussed in the previous article of this series that looked at the history of the teaching, as well as the study, of Korea and the Korean language at educational institutions that are located across all three levels of the Australian education system (and in particular at educational institutions that are located at the tertiary level of the Australian education system), in recent years, there had been a gradual decline in the number of academic programs that specialise in the teaching, as well as the study, of Korea and the Korean language at educational institutions that are located across all three levels of the Australian education system; and, when combined with the decline in the number of academic programs that specialise in the teaching, as well as the study, of Asia and Asian languages other than English (and in particular the four Asian languages other than English that were identified as ‘priority’ Asian languages other than English in the Australia in the Asian Century white paper that was released by the Australian Federal Government in October 2012) at educational institutions that are located across all three levels of the Australian education system (and in particular educational institutions that are located at the tertiary level of the Australian education system) has had negative ramifications for the level of Korea literacy, as well as the level of Asia literacy that exist among, not only among students who are undertaking study at educational institutions that are located across all three levels of the Australian education system (and in particular educational institutions that are located at the tertiary level of the Australian education system). And while governments at all three levels of the Australian political system has been placing a greater emphasis on the teaching, as well as the study, of Asia and Asian languages other than English (including the teaching, and the study, of Korea and the Korean language) at educational institutions that are located across all three levels of the Australian education system, and in particular educational institutions that are located at the tertiary level of the Australian education system, in recent years, there had been a greater emphasis being paid to the teaching, as well as the study, of subjects that are in the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) fields of study at the expense of subjects that are in the HASS (Humanities, the Arts and Social Sciences) fields of study, and this can have negative repercussions for, not only the level of Asia literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, but also the various relationships that Australia has with Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories (and in particular the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea, which will be discussed in more detail in the next article in this series of articles, that will look at the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea, with a particular emphasis being paid to the diplomatic relationships that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea).

When it comes to the development of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and in particular the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at educational institutions that are located across all three levels of the Australian education system (and especially the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at educational institutions that are located at the tertiary level of the Australian education system), while the teaching, as well as the study, of Korea and the Korean language, at educational institutions that are located across all three levels of the Australian education system can play a role in developing a high level of Korea literacy among the general Australian populace, it is not the only sector within the wider Australian society that can influence the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace is the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of news and current affairs emanating from the Republic of Korea in large sections of the Australian media (whether the media outlet in question is part of the so-called “mainstream media” or is part of the so-called “alternative media”), which has seen a stark decline in recent years, and this reduction in the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of news and current affairs events emanating from the Republic of Korea (and especially the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of news and current affairs events emanating from Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories in general) has had negative repercussions for the level of Asia literacy that exist amogn the general Australian populace – as well as the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace – and this in turn has had negative ramifications for how the general Australian populace views Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories, and in particular how members of the general Australian populace views the Republic of Korea and the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea, whether the relationship in question is diplomatic, economic, business-to-business, or people-to-people.

It has often been argued that the media (whether the media outlet in question is part of the so-called “mainstream media” or is part of the so-called “alternative media”) serves as the people’s window on the outside world (a role that became more important during the coronavirus pandemic when much of the world was in lockdown in order to prevent the spread of the virus), and more often than not, the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from the world’s constituent nation-states and territories can have consequences for how the people of the world views the constituent nation-states and territories of the world, and this is especially the case when it comes to how the general Australian populace views Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories, and in particular how the general Australian populace view the various relationships that Australia has with Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories (again, whether the relationship in question is diplomatic, economic, business-to-business, or people-to-people), and this is true when it comes to the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea. When it comes to the image that the general Australian populace has of the Republic of Korea, as well as the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea, an argument could be made that the image of the Republic of Korea that is projected to the general Australian populace through the Australian media (whether the media outlet in question is part of the so-called “mainstream media” or is part of the so-called “alternative media”) can have ramifications for how the general Australian populace, not only views the Republic of Korea, but also how the general Australian populace views the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea, and in particular the diplomatic relationship that Australia has with the Republic of Korea, which will be looked at in the next article in this series of articles that will be looking at the various relationships, and in particular the diplomatic relationship, that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea.

When it comes to the level, depth, and quality, of the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from the Korean Peninsula (whether the coverage of the key news and current affairs events are emanating from the Republic of Korea or the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea) in large sections of the Australian media (whether the media outlet in question is part of the so-called “mainstream media” or is part of the so-called “alternative media”), there is often a large gulf of difference when it comes to the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea when compared to the level, depth, and quality of key news and current affairs events emanating from the Republic of Korea, and an argument could be made that this difference when it comes to the level, depth, and quality, of the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from the two sides of the 38th Parallel that divides the Korean Peninsula can have ramifications for, not only how the general Australian populace view the Republic of Korea (and, more generally, the Korean Peninsula as a whole), but also how the general Australian populace views the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea, which is widely considered to be one of the most important relationships that Australia has with Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories. When it comes to the media in Australia, both the so-called “mainstream media” as well as the so-called “alternative media” plays an important role when it comes to the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from the Republic of Korea and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, and that the coverage of key news and current affairs events from this part of the world plays an important role in helping the general Australian populace better understand the Korean Peninsula.

As will be discussed throughout the course of this fourth article in this series of articles on Korea literacy in Australia, I will be looking at the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from the Republic of Korea (and, to a lesser extent, the level, depth, and quality of key news and current affairs events emanating from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea), and the impact that this has had on, not only the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at educational institutions that are located across all three levels of the Australian education system (whether the educational institution in question is located at the primary, secondary, or tertiary level of the Australian education system, but also the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace as a whole. In this fourth article in the series, I will first look at the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from the Korean Peninsula (whether it is emanating from the Republic of Korea or the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea) in large sections of the Australian media (whether the media outlet in question is part of the so-called “mainstream media” or is part of the so-called “alternative media”). In the second section of the article, I will be looking at the coverage of elections that are held in the Republic of Korea in large sections of the Australian media, and how the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of elections in the Republic of Korea in large sections of the Australian media can influence the image that the general Australian populace has of the Republic of Korea. The final section of the article will have a look at the level, depth, and quality of key news and current affairs events emanating from the Republic of Korea in large sections of the Australian media, and juxtapose this with the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of news and current affairs events emanating from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea in large sections of the Australian media.

If you wish to read the entire article, you can read it at bhiskins.wordpress.com/2025/09…

On 28 February 2026, the United States of America and Israel attacked Iran, using the pretext of ending Iran’s nuclear weapons program and freeing the people of Iran from the rule of the Ayatollahs, who had ruled Iran with an iron fist since the founding of the Islamic Republic of Iran in 1979. If you have been following the news in the lead up to the bombing of Iran, you would’ve noticed several instances of hypocrisy emanating from the President of the United States of America Donald Trump, and it is these instances of hypocrisy that had come from President Trump that may have exposed the aims of the United States of America in regards to the attack on Iran.

Firstly, I should start by saying that I support the people of Iran in their quest for freedom from the Ayatollahs, and in regards to Israel, I believe that the people of Iran and the people of Israel have more in common with each other than they have with their own government. The people of Israel does not want war with Iran, and the people of Iran don’t want war with Israel, but sadly, it is inevitable that both will be forced into war against each other, which is not in the interests of the people of Israel, nor is it in the interest of the people of Iran.

This is where there is an instance of hypocrisy emanating from President Trump. In the lead up to the bombing of Iran on 28 February 2026, President Trump called for the people of Iran to rise up against the Ayatollahs, and that the United States of America would support the people of Iran in their quest for freedom from the Ayatollahs. And while I do support freedom for the people of Iran from the rule of the Ayatollahs, this is one instance of hypocrisy from the Trump regime in the United States of America, in which, while President Trump had expressed support for the protesters in Iran, the same man called protesters in the United States of America hwho had been protesting against ICE “domestic terrorists” who should be jailed for protesting against ICE agents who had been carrying out human right abuses against American citizens, and in some instances has seen American citizens being killed by ICE. Is this not a double standard emanating from the Trump regime? And why does the Trump regime not care about the people of Gaza?

In addition to the numerous human rights abuses that had been carried out by the Trump regime in the United States of America through the deployment of ICE agents in various places in the United States of America and have killed American citizens, there had been attacks on the democratic process in the United States of America by the Trump regime, including purges in regards to voting databases throughout the United States of America, claiming that there had been instances of non-citizens illegally voting, even though this had largely been disproved, even by the ultraconservative Heritage Foundation. How is this not a double standard emanating from the Trump regime?

Yes, the people of Iran should be free from the Ayatollahs, but at the same time, the people of the United States of America should be free from the Trump regime. And in regards to the conflict in the Middle East, neither the people of Israel, nor the people of the United States of America, nor the people of Iran want war. War is in no one’s interest.

And will those in power send their own children into conflict?

When it comes to the development of Asia literacy, and in particular the level of Korea literacy, that exist among the general Australian populace, and in particular the level of Asia literacy and Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system (and especially among students who are undertaking study at the tertiary level of the Australian education system), the Australian education system plays an important role to play when it comes to the development of Asia literacy, and in particular the development of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and in particular among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system. And when it comes to the various relationships that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea (whether the type of relationship in question is diplomatic, economic, business-to-business, or people-to-people), having a high level of Korea literacy among the general Australian populace, and in particular having a high level of Korea literacy among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, is considered to be important when it comes to the various relationships that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea, whether the relationship in question is diplomatic, economic, business-to-business, or people-to-people. However, in recent years, there has been had been a gradual decline in the number of academic programs that specialise in the teaching, as well as the study, of Asia and Asian languages other than English (and in particular the teaching, as well as the study, of the four Asian languages other than English that were identified as ‘priority’ Asian languages other than English in the Australia in the Asian Century white paper that was published in October 2012) at all three levels of the Australian education system, and in particular the decline in the number of academic programs in Asian Studies and Asian languages other than English that are offered at the tertiary level of the Australian education system, and it could be argued that the decline in the number of academic programs in Asian Studies and Asian languages other than English that are offered at all three levels of the Australian education system, can have negative ramifications for the various relationships that Australia has with Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories (and in particular the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea), as well as how the general Australian populace views the various relationships that Australia has with Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories.

When it comes to the decline in the level, depth, and quality of the teaching, as well as the study, of Asia and Asian languages other than English (and in particular the four Asian languages other than English that were identified as ‘priority’ Asian languages other than English in the Australia in the Asian Century white paper that was released in October 2012), one of the constituent nation-states of Asia that had experienced a decline in the study of in recent years had been the Republic of Korea, which, as has been discussed in previous articles in this series of articles that is looking at Korea literacy in Australia, has become one of the most important relationships that Australia has with the constituent nation-states and territories of Asia, and this is especially the case as both Australia and the Republic of Korea are both considered to be global middle powers when it comes to global politics and international relations, with both Australia and the Republic of Korea being members of MIKTA – which is a grouping of global middle powers – along with Mexico, Indonesia, and Turkiye. And while it could be argued that the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea (and in particular the diplomatic, as well as the people-to-people relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea) being among the most important relationships that Australia has with Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories, it should be acknowledged at this point that when it comes to the teaching, as well as the study, of Asian languages other than English (and in particular the four ‘priority’ Asian languages other than English that were identified in the Australia in the Asian Century white paper that was published by the Australian Federal Government in October 2012), the Korean language was not identified as one of the four ‘priority’ Asian languages other than English that were identified in the Australia in the Asian Century white paper, even though it could be argued that the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea is widely considered to be one of the most important relationships that Australia has with Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories, and that it could also be argued that the fact that the Korean language was not one of the four Asian languages other than English that were identified as ‘priority’ Asian languages other than English in the Australia in the Asian Century white paper that was released by the Australian Federal Government in October 2012 (the four Asian languages other than English that were identified as ‘priority’ Asian languages other than English in the Australia in the Asian Century white paper being Chinese (Mandarin), Hindi, Indonesian and Japanese) has resulted in a decline in the level of interest in the study of the Korean language among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, and that it could be argued that this decline in the number of students undertaking study in the Korean language at all three levels of the Australian education system, and it could even be argued that this decline in the number of students undertaking study in the Korean language within the Australian education system can have ramifications for the level of Korea literacy that exists among, not only students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system (whether it is at the primary, secondary, or tertiary levels of the Australian education system), but also the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and this can have negative ramifications for the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea (and this has particularly been the case when it came to the diplomatic and people-to-people relationships that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea), and in particular how members of the general Australian populace views the various relationships that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea, and in particular how members of the general Australian populace views both the diplomatic, and the people-to-people, relationships that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea, and this in turn can influence the various relationships that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea.

It has often been argued that the level of Asia literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and in particular the level of Asia literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system (and in particular students who are undertaking study at the tertiary level of the Australian education system) can have an influence on how Asia, and in particular the various relationships that Australia has with Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories, and this is particularly true when it comes to the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace. As will be discussed in this article, in recent years, there has been a gradual decline in the number of academic programs that specialise in the teaching, as well as the study, of Korea and the Korean language, at all three levels of the Australian education system (with this decline being most pronounced at educational institutions that are located at the tertiary level of the Australian education system), and it could be argued that the decline in the number of academic programs that specialise in the teaching, as well as the study, of Korea and the Korean language at all three levels of the Australian education system has had ramifications for how members of the general Australian populace views the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea (and in particular the diplomatic and people-to-people relationships that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea), but also how the general Australian populace views the Republic of Korea itself

If you wish to read the entire article, you can read it via my website at bhiskins.wordpress.com/2025/08…

When it comes to the various relationships that Australia has with Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories, the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea (and in particular the diplomatic and the people-to-people relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea) is widely considered to be one of the most important relationships that Australia has with Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories. So why is the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea considered to be one of the most important relationships that Australia has with Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories? And why is having a high level of Korea literacy (in addition to having a high level of Asia literacy in general) important when it comes to the understanding, as well as the fostering, of the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea (whether the relationship in question is diplomatic, economic, business-to-business, or people-to-people)? As will be argued in this second article in this second article in the series of articles that will look at the history of the various relationships that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea, and how the history of the various relationships that exist between Australia and (what is now) the Republic of Korea has influenced the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and in particular the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system (whether the student in question is undertaking study at the primary, secondary, or tertiary level of the Australian education system), as well as how the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace (and in particular the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system) can have ramifications for both the image that the general Australian populace has of the Republic of Korea (as well as the image that the general Australian populace has of the Korean Peninsula in general), as well as how the general Australian populace views the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea (whether the type of relationship between Australia and the Republic of Korea in question is diplomatic, economic, business-to-business, or people-to-people).

When it comes to the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and in particular the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, there are several variables that can affect the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace. The first of these variables that can have ramifications for the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace is the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from the Republic of Korea (as well as the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from the Korean Peninsula in general) in large sections of the Australian media (whether the media outlet in question is part of the so-called “mainstream media” or is part of the so-called “alternative media”). As will be highlighted in the fourth and fifth articles in this series of articles that will look at the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, having a high level of understanding of key news and current affairs events emanating from the Republic of Korea, as well as having a high level of understanding of key news and current affairs events emanating from the Korean Peninsula in general, is important when it comes to the development of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace. However, and this will be discussed in more detail in the fourth article in this series of articles on Korea literacy in Australia (the fourth article in this series of articles will look at the coverage of Korea in the Australian media), despite the importance of having a high level of understanding of key news and current affairs events stemming from the Republic of Korea (as well as having a high level of understanding of key news and current affairs events emanating from the Korean Peninsula as a whole) to the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and in particular the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, in recent years, there had been a gradual decline in the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from the Republic of Korea, as well as a gradual decline in the level, depth, and quality of key news and current affairs events events emanating from the Korean Peninsula in general, in large sections of the Australian media (whether the media outlet in question is part of the so-called “mainstream media” or is part of the so-called “alternative media”), and an argument could be made that this decline in the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from the Republic of Korea has had negative ramifications for the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace.

Another variable that can have ramifications for the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace is the level, depth, and quality of key news and current affairs in regards to the diplomatic relationship that exists between Australia and the Republic of Korea, an issue that will be discussed in much detail in the fifth article in this series, which will look at the coverage of the various relationships that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea (whether the relationship in question is diplomatic, economic, business-to-business, or people-to-people). As will be discussed throughout this series of articles, the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea (whether the relationship in question is diplomatic, economic, business-to-business, or people-to-people) is widely considered to be one of the most important relationships that Australia has with Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories, and this is largely due to both Australia and the Republic of Korea being considered to be global middle powers when it comes to global politics and international relations, and that when it comes to international groupings, both Australia and the Republic of Korea are both members of MIKTA (alongside Mexico, Indonesia and Türkiye), which is a grouping of global middle powers in the realms of global politics and international relations. Another aspect in regards to the importance of the various relationships that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea that will be discussed in much detail in the coverage of the various relationships that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea, is the alliance that both Australia and the Republic of Korea has with the United States of America. However, despite the importance of the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea (and this is especially the case when it comes to the diplomatic and people-to-people relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea), an argument could be made that there is very little, if any, coverage of the various relationships that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea in large sections of the Australian media (whether the media outlet in question is part of the so-called “mainstream media” or Is part of the so-called “alternative media”) and that this lack of coverage of the various relationships that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea in large sections of the Australian media can have ramifications for, not only the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace (and in particular the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, whether the student is undertaking study at an educational institution that is located at the primary, secondary, or tertiary level of the Australian education system), and this in turn can have ramifications for, not only the image that the general Australian populace has of the Republic of Korea (as well as the image that the general Australian populace has of the Korean Peninsula in general), but also how the general Australian populace views the various relationships that exist between Australia and the Republic of Korea (whether the relationship in question is diplomatic, economic, business-to-business, or people-to-people), with the two most important of these relationships, which will be the centre of the discussion of the fifth article in this series of articles, being the diplomatic and the people-to-people relationships between Australia and the Republic of Korea, and how the Australian media outlets (whether it is the so-called “mainstream media” or the so-called “alternative media”) covers the various relationships that exist between the two nation-states affect, not only the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace (and in particular the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system), but also how the general Australian populace views the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea.

The third, and final, variable that can influence the level of Korea literacy that exist among, not only the general Australian populace as a whole, but more specifically the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, is the level, depth, and quality, of the teaching, as well as the study, of Korea and the Korean language at educational institutions that are located at all three levels of the Australian education system (whether the educational institution in question is located at the primary, secondary, or tertiary level of the Australian education system). When it comes to how the teaching, as well as the study, of Korea and the Korean language is taught and studied at educational institutions that are located at the three levels of the Australian education system (and in particular the teaching and study of Korea and the Korean language at the tertiary level of the Australian education system), the teaching, as well as the study, of Korea and the Korean language in the Australian education system, is part of moves by governments that are located at all three levels of the Australian political system (and in particular governments that are located at the federal level of the Australian political system) to increase the level of Asia literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and in particular the level of Asia literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system (whether the student in question is undertaking study at the primary, secondary, or tertiary level of the Australian education system), in order to better prepare members of the general Australian populace for both the challenges, as well as the opportunities, that had been presented by the “Asian Century” and the rise of Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories. And, as will be discussed in the next article in this series of articles, despite the various relationships that Australia has with the Republic of Korea (whether the relationship that Australia has with the Republic of Korea is diplomatic, economic, business-to-business, or people-to-people) are among the most important relationships that Australia has with Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories, there has been very little, if any, effort from governments at all three levels of the Australian political system (and in particular governments at the federal level of the Australian political system) to encourage students who are undertaking study at the three levels of the Australian educational system to undertake study of Korea and the Korean language as part of their studies. When it comes to the teaching, as well as the study, of the Korean language at educational institutions that are located at all three levels of the Australian education system – and this has been most pronounced at educational institutions that are located at both the primary and secondary levels of the Australian education system – there are few educational institutions that offer academic programs that specialise in the teaching, as well as the study, of the Korean language as a language other than English, and when it comes to the availability of the Korean language as a language other than English at educational institutions that are located at the primary and secondary levels of the Australian education system, an arugment could be made that there is a large discrepancy between the various Australian states and territories when it comes to the number of educational institutions that offers students to undertake study in the Korean language as a language other than English at either the primary or secondary levels of the Australian education system, with the majority of educational institutions that are located at the primary and secondary levels of the Australian education system that offers the Korean language as a language other than English being in New South Wales.

In addition, when it comes to the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and in particular the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system (whether the student in question is undertaking study at the primary, secondary, or tertiary levels of the Australian education system), there are hurdles in place when it comes to increasing the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace. And while the main variable that has been impacted by this particular issue revolves around the teaching, as well as the study, of Korea and the Korean language at educational institutions that are located across all three levels of the Australian education system, it can also have ramifications for the other two variables that can influence the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and in particular the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, and that is the level of proficiency that each individual member of the generla Australian populace has of the Korean language. As will be discussed in this second article in this series of articles that will look at Korea literacy, when it comes to the development of a high level of Korea literacy among the individual members of the general Australian populace, having a high level of proficiency in the Korean language is considered to be the key to the development of a high level of Korea literacy among members of the general Australian populace, and in particular the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system; however, when it comes to the development of a high level of proficiency in the Korean language among the general Australian populace, and in particular a high level of proficiency in the Korean language among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, being able to develop a high level of proficiency in the Korean language is easier said than done. In October 2012, the Australian Federal Government (which, at the time, was led by Prime Minister Julia Gillard of the centre-left Australian Labor Party) released the Australia in the Asian Century white pape, which paid particular attention to increasing the level of Asia literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and in particular increasing the level of Asia literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system (whether the student in question is undertaking study at the primary, secondary, or tertiary level of the Australian education system) by placing a stronger emphasis on the teaching, as well as the study, of Asia by avtively encouraging students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system (and in particular students who are undertaking study at the tertiary level of the Australian education system) to undertake study of Asia and an Asian language other than English (and in particular one of the Asian languages other than English that was identified as one of the ‘priority’ Asian languages other than English in the Australia in the Asian Century white paper). And, as will be discussed in the next article in this series of articles, while the four Asian languages other than English were identified as ‘priority’ Asian languages other than English in the Australia in the Asian Century white paper that was released by the Australian Federal Government in October 2012, unfortunately, the Korean language was not one of the four Asian languages other than English that was identified as one of the four ‘priority’ Asian languages other than English in the Australia in the Asian Century white paepr that was releasewd in October 2012 (for the record, the four Asian languages other than English that were identified as ‘priority’ Asian languages other than English in the Australia in the Asian Century white paper were Chinese (Mandarin), Hindi, Indonesian, and Japanese).

When it comes to the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and in particular the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system (whether the student in question is undertaking study at an educational institution that is located at the primary, secondary, or tertiary levels of the Australian education system), there are several aspects that needs to be looked at when it comes to the level of Korea literacy in Australia, one of which is the history of the various relationships between Australia and (what is now) the Republic of Korea, which will be the centre of attention in this second article in the series of articles that will look at the history of the teaching, as well as the study, of Korea and the Korean language within the Australian education system, and how the history of the various relationships that exists between Australia and the Republic of Korea has impacted the level of Korea literacy that exist, not only among students who are undertaking study at educational institutions that are located at all three levels of the Australian education system, but also the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace as well.

If you wish to read the entire article, you can read it at my website at bhiskins.wordpress.com/2025/08…

When it comes to the teaching, as well as the study, of Asia and Asian languages other than English (and in particular the four Asian languages other than English (and in particular the four Asian languages other than English that were identified as ‘priority’ Asian languages other than English in the Australia in the Asian Century white paper that was released in October 2012 by the Australian Federal Government, with the four ‘priority’ Asian languages other than English that were identified being Chinese (Mandarin), Hindi, Indonesian, and Japanese) has at all three levels of the Australian education system (whether it was at the primary, secondary, or tertiary levels of the Australian education system) has experienced a gradual decline in the level, depth, and quality, of both the teaching, as well as the study, and an argument could be made that this decline in the teaching, as well as the study, of Asia and Asian languages other than English (and in particular the four ‘priority’ Asian languages other than English that were identified in the Australia in the Asian Century white paper) has the potential to have negative ramifications for, not only the level of Asia literacy that exist among the general Australian populace (and in particular among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system), but also how the general Australian populace views Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories. When it comes to how the general Australian populace (and in particular students undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system) views Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories, an argument could be made that the level of Asia literacy that exist among the general Australian populace would have ramifications for how Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories are viewed among the general Australian populace, with those who have a high level of Asia literacy being more likely to have a more favourable view of Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories than those who have a low level of Asia literacy.

When it came to increasing the level of Asia literacy that existed among students undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system (whether it is at the primary, secondary, or tertiary level of the Australian education system, the two major Australian political parties (whether it is the centre-left Australian Labor Party or the centre-right Liberal Party) had largely been on a unity ticket when it came to increasing the level of Asia literacy that exist, not only among students undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, but also among members of the general Australian populace as well, whether it was through the encouragement of the teaching, as well as the study, of Asia and Asian languages other than English within all three levels of the Australian education system (whether it was at the primary, secondary, or tertiary levels of the Australian education system) or encouraging Australians to undertake work experience in one of the constituent nation-states or territories of Asia. And while the methods to increase the level of Asia literacy that existed among the general Australian populace, and in particular among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, had been different between the two major Australian political parties (whether it is the centre-left Australian Labor Party or the centre-right Liberal Party that was in power at the federal level of the Australian political system), the goal of both of Australia’s two major political political parties was to, not only to increase the level of Asia literacy that exist among the general Australian populace (and in particular the level of Asia literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system), but also facilitate people-to-people relationships between the people of Australia and the people of Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories.

And while there has been much emphasis on the teaching, as well as the study, of Asia and Asian languages other than English (and in particular the teaching, as well as the study, of the four Asian languages other than English that were identified as ‘priority’ Asian languages other than English in the Australia in the Asian Century white paper that was released in October 2012), at all three levels of the Australian education system in order to better prepare students for both the challenges, as well as the opportunities, that has been presented by the “Asian Century” and the rise of Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories, in recent years, there has been an increase in the level of emphasis from governments at all three levels of the Australian education system (and in particular from governments at the federal level of the Australian political system) being paid to the teaching, as well as the study, of subjects that are in the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) fields of study at the expense of the teaching and study of subjects that are in the HASS (Humanities, the Arts and Social Sciences) fields of study, the latter including Asian Studies, and an argument could be made that this increase in the level of emphasis that governments has paid to the teaching, as well as the study, of subjects that are in the STEM fields of study at the expense of the teaching and study of subjects that are in the HASS fields of study could have ramifications for the level of Asia literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, and this in turn could have ramifications for the level of Asia literacy that exist among the general Australian populace as a whole. However, when it comes to the development of Asia literacy among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, and by extension increasing the level of Asia literacy that exist among the general Australian populace in general, the decline in the level, depth, and quality of the teaching and the study of Asia and Asian languages other than English (and in particular the teaching and the study of the four Asian languages other than English that were identified as ‘priority’ Asian languages other than English in the Australia in the Asian Century white paper) has not been the only variable that had contributed to the decline in the level of Asia literacy that existed among the general Australian populace, as another variable that had contributed to the decline in the level of Asia literacy that existed among the general Australian populace, and in particular among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, as another variable that had contributed to a decline in the level of Asia literacy that exist among the general Australian populace has been the decline in the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from Asia and its constituent nation-states in large sections of the Australian media (whether the media outlet in question is part of the so-called “mainstream media” or is part of the so-called “alternative media”), and much like the decline in the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories has had ramifications for the level of Asia literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and in particular among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, and this in turn can have ramifications for how the general Australian populace views Asia and its could be argued that this decline in the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories, this can also have ramifications for the image that the general Australian populace has of Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories, and this too can have ramifications for how the general Australian populace views Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories.

When it comes to the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories in large sections of the Australian media (whether

When it comes to the development of Asia literacy among the general Australian populace, and in particular among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, the Australian education system is not the only variable that can influence the level of Asia literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, as another variable that can influence the level of Asia literacy that exist among the general Australian populace is the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories in large sections of the Australian media (whether the media outlet in question is part of the so-called “mainstream media” or is part of the so-called “alternative media”), and much like the decline in the level, depth, and quality of the teaching, as well as the study, of Asia and Asian languages other than English at all three levels of the Australian education system (whether it is at the primary, secondary, or tertiary level of the Australian education system), there has also been a decline in the level, depth, and quality in the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories. And much like how the decline in the level, depth, and quality in the teaching, as well as the study, of Asia and Asian languages other than English (and in particular the teaching, and the study, of the four Asian languages other than English that were identified in the Australia in the Asian Century white paper that was released in October 2012) has had ramifications for the level of Asia literacy that existed among the general Australian populace (and in particular the level of Asia literacy that existed among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, whether the student in question is undertaking study at the primary, secondary, or tertiary level of the Australian education system), the gradual decline in the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories has also had ramifications for the level of Asia literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and that this in turn can have ramifications for how the general Australian populace views Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories.

When it comes to the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories in large sections of the Australian media (whether the media outlet in question is part of the so-called “mainstream media” or is part of the so-called “alternative media”), there has been a gradual decline in the level, depth, and quality when it comes to the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories, and it could be argued that this decline in the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories, and much like the impact that the decline in the level, depth, and quality in the teaching, as well as the study, of Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories at all three levels of the Australian education system had impacted how the general Australian populace (and in particular among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system had, not only impacted the level of Asia literacy that existed among the general Australian populace, but also the level of country-specific literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and in particular the level of country-specific literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system. When it comes to increasing the level of Asia literacy through the Australian education system (and in particular at the tertiary level of the Australian education system, where students who hope to gain employment in areas such as diplomacy or intelligence, tends to specialise in a particular nation-state or territory as part of their studies), having access to the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from the particular nation-state or territory that the student has interest in when it comes to specialisation is just as important to the development of country-specific literacy as subjects that are available at their specific educational institution. However, and this has been discussed a number of times throughout the course of this article thus far, there has been a gradual decline in the level, depth, and quality of the coverage of key news and current affairs events emanating from Asia and its constituent nation-states and territories in recent years, with this decline being more pronounced in regards to certain nation-states and territories in Asia than others, with one of the nation-states in Asia that has seen a more pronounced decline in the level, depth, and quality in regards to key news and current affairs events, as well as a decline in the level of focus at all three levels of the Australian education system being the Republic of Korea, which will be the focus of this series of articles that will look at the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and how the decline in the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace (and in particular the level of Korea literacy that exist among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system) had coincided with the decline in the level of Asia literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and that an argument could be made that this decline in the level of Korea literacy that exist among the general Australian populace, and in particular among students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, can have ramifications for the level of Asia literacy, and in particular the level of Korea literacy, that exist among the general Australian populace, and this can also have ramifications for how the general Australian populace, and in particular students who are undertaking study at all three levels of the Australian education system, and this can in turn have ramifications for how the Republic of Korea (the official name of South Korea) is viewed among the general Australian populace in regards to the various relationships that Australian have with South Korea, whether the relationship in question is diplomatic, economic, business-to-business, or people-to-people.

You can read the entire article on my website at bhiskins.wordpress.com/2025/08…

Hello and welcome to my new channels on both Naver Band and Friendica. My name is Brenden Hiskins and I am from Melbourne, Australia. On these channels (as well as on my other channels, which can be accessed via Linktree at linktr.ee/brendenhiskins/), I will be looking at Asia literacy in Australia and the level of Asia literacy that exist in Australia, and in particular the level of Asia literacy that exist among members of the general Australian populace, although occasionally, I may discuss other issues in regards to Asia among my channels (such as elections that are held in Asia.

So, what are my qualifications you may ask? I have a Masters degree in Asian Studies from Monash University and a Masters degree in International Relations from the University of Melbourne. Prior to that, I graduated with a Bachelor of Arts (with majors in Asian Studies and International Cultural Studies) from Victoria University. In addition, I am in the process of learning Korean.

You can access all my channels at linktr.ee/brendenhiskins/, and you can also contact me at bhiskins.1984.2@proton.me if you have any questions on Asia literacy, or you can post on these channels.