This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to Petra van Cronenburg

I think people who self-host may be safe, but this is definitely an existential threat... the possibility of mandatory age verification for all social media platforms across Europe.

And guess who's lobbying for age verification and has everything to gain from it?

Evil f***ing Meta

discuss.privacyguides.net/t/a-…

reshared this

in reply to Elena Rossini on GoToSocial ⁂

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

in reply to Elena Rossini on GoToSocial ⁂

The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please go to the original post.

in reply to Hyde 📷 🖋

oooh I was being sarcastic. Maybe you missed my articles about W Social.

I don't want to waste your time, but I have a 3-part blog series that takes 40 minutes to read and exposes their shady ways: blog.elenarossini.com/tag/w-so…

@aral

in reply to Elena Rossini on GoToSocial ⁂

JFC that's a shit show. How the hell can someone:

Choose and sign up to an email provider.
Sign up for a W social account per that 13 step list.

Yet still say signing up for a Mastodon account is too hard.

Incredible.

Also, well done on all the work investigating W Social, it's much appreciated!

reshared this

in reply to Gert V 🇵🇸

The European Commission was accused of promoting the for-profit,
Sweden-based social media platform W Social after announcing its
decision to join the network.

euractiv.com/news/commission-a…

reshared this

in reply to Elena Rossini on GoToSocial ⁂

Reminds me of the "new emergency services number" bit from IT Crowd ( youtu.be/HWc3WY3fuZU?t=20 )

In what world would this be considered simple??

in reply to Elena Rossini on GoToSocial ⁂

W Social's head, Dr. Anna Zeiter, is a German privacy lawyer, now based in Switzerland, who has a string of academic degrees.

Her prior work as chief privacy officer for eBay suggests that her perspective on consumer privacy is rather like that of a labor lawyer who represents employers, not labor.

W Social's undisclosed funding and the extensive data users must submit to join seem to be in direct conflict with its stated aim: to be a privacy-focused alternative to Xitter.

This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to Elena Rossini on GoToSocial ⁂

If it's any consolation, Patrick Breyer's report on Chat Control <patrick-breyer.de/en/posts/cha…> says services that are neither paid nor funded by advertising are out of scope. That excludes the Fediverse (aside from Threads and Truth Social), Linux, Tor, and most other free-and-open-source things.

Whether this will remain true in future negotiations, I don't know, but Dr Breyer has been quiet <digitalcourage.social/@echo_pb…> and he probably would've sounded the alarm if the exemption was in danger.

in reply to Elena Rossini on GoToSocial ⁂

How on earth was this whole thing conceptualized?!

Some European person: Guys, Twitter, or whatever it's called these days, kinda sucks now, couldn't we make our own thing over here, but without the US involved in the technology?
Everyone: nod agreement
Some random dude: I've got the solution!
Everyone: Do tell!
Random dude: What if, bear with me here, we do the same thing this BlueSky thing does, but worse? Like, reinventing the wheel but actually making it square!
Everyone: Brilliant!
One lonely voice: Um guys? We have a ready-made solution already, it's called the Fediverse and it...
Everyone: proceed to ignore everything else and set about building square wheels

in reply to Elena Rossini on GoToSocial ⁂

the fact that the verification is temporary is criminal, "yeah we want all your data and it better always be the most up to date version"

i guess a suitcase full of cash sounds a lot better than actually adhering to your digital sovereignty plans :blobfoxthumbsup: it's so Big Tech-independent in fact that the identity app is only available on US-based, data-hungry app stores

in reply to Elena Rossini on GoToSocial ⁂

tbh a barrier on entry is almost always good these days.

Just take a look at a shithole that is Threads - all you had to do is install the app and connect with already existing Instagram account and it's a cesspool of rage bait and scams.

So I think this is the wrong issue to focus on. If anything we should make mastodon registration harder. If you can't afford 10 minutes to create an account then you can't afford to socialize online either 🫣

in reply to wraptile

Nobody is going to spend 10 minutes creating an account on a site nobody ever heard of. They might do that for X, but they won't do that for us. So that's a great way to destroy the Fediverse.

I've never been on Threads, but if what you say is true and it's full of rage bait and scams, then that's what the algorithm there must be promoting. Fedi doesn't have that problem and neither did the 1990s Internet. Why? No algorithm. No behavioral analysis. That's why.

@elena

This entry was edited (5 days ago)