Political Spectrum
In my view, the path to a truly functional society lies in a rigorous balance between the efficiency of the free market and the absolute sovereignty of the individual. I believe that economic globalization is an unstoppable reality, but for it to be sustainable, it must be steered to serve humanity. However, "serving humanity" should not be a pretext for a descent into stifling bureaucracy. Rather, it means creating a healthy, competitive environment where the most capable entities can thrive without becoming oppressive monopolies. To me, the freer the market, the freer the people; it is the most natural way to determine value, whether that be the price of a product, the prestige of a brand, or the worth of a company.
Socially, I stand for a brand of pragmatic individualism. While I feel a deep, almost destined duty to support my country of domicile, I reject the arbitrary pride of birth or the divisive labels of race. We are defined by our synapses, our discipline, and our contributions, not by ethnic origin. I believe that personal matters—be it religion, sexuality, or medical choices like abortion—belong strictly in the private sphere, far from the reach of the state. It is the responsibility of the individual to seek out information and form a balanced opinion, especially in an era where information and entertainment have become worryingly fused.
I am fundamentally opposed to compulsory taxation, viewing it as an infringement on the value created by the population. I recognize that a social pyramid is a natural fact of human interaction, but that hierarchy should be a product of competition and experience rather than state-mandated classism. While I believe in a safety net for the most basic needs, I trust in a market-led approach to everything from education to environmental research. I hold the political view that governments should refrain from regulation as much as possible, opting instead to promote the development of scientific and social progress through research and information.
This perspective is particularly relevant when discussing our modern healthcare systems. I believe that a healthy lifestyle for everyone, with equal access to basic emergency care, is far superior to propping up a corrupt and inefficient healthcare bureaucracy. Personal fitness and preventive care should be the primary focus, promoted as a matter of individual duty rather than a state-managed commodity. A society that prioritizes physical discipline and personal health creates a more resilient workforce and reduces the need for the predatory medical markets that often exploit the vulnerable. Those with the ability to pay should certainly have access to higher standards of care, but the foundation of our well-being should be built on personal responsibility, not institutional dependency.
My philosophy is ultimately one of enlightened self-reliance. I see the world through the lens of strategic realism: I acknowledge that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" and that national survival may sometimes supersede international law. Yet, I also believe in the power of forgiveness to prevent the escalation of violence and the importance of rehabilitation in criminal justice—even if I recognize the cynical economic utility of prison labor. We live in a world where class often divides us more than borders, and where the wealthy can buy the mobility that the average person cannot. My goal is a society where authority is always questioned, discipline is viewed as a form of inspiration, and every individual is free to reap the rewards of their own hard work.