New- article from this past weekend is out now where a rally organized by a coalition of labor unions and community members turned violent when federal agents unleashed tear gas, rubber bullets, and other munitions on Portlanders, including young children, highlighting the deepening militarization of law enforcement and the community’s unwavering resistance.
I spoke with multiple people who were on the ground, including a street medic who said “I’ve been working in this field for over 8 years now and I’ve seen a lot of shit, but that was truly one of the most terrible things I’ve witnessed and I never thought that I’d have to see actual children getting gassed like that, but here we are I suppose.”
“This couple with a stroller emerged from the cloud with their maybe 2 or 3 year old daughter sitting barely conscious in that stroller. The parents were coughing and could barely walk, couldn’t see anything, this poor little girl was covered in her own vomit and sputum and mucus was pouring from her nose. She was just si
... Show more...New- article from this past weekend is out now where a rally organized by a coalition of labor unions and community members turned violent when federal agents unleashed tear gas, rubber bullets, and other munitions on Portlanders, including young children, highlighting the deepening militarization of law enforcement and the community’s unwavering resistance.
I spoke with multiple people who were on the ground, including a street medic who said “I’ve been working in this field for over 8 years now and I’ve seen a lot of shit, but that was truly one of the most terrible things I’ve witnessed and I never thought that I’d have to see actual children getting gassed like that, but here we are I suppose.”
“This couple with a stroller emerged from the cloud with their maybe 2 or 3 year old daughter sitting barely conscious in that stroller. The parents were coughing and could barely walk, couldn’t see anything, this poor little girl was covered in her own vomit and sputum and mucus was pouring from her nose. She was just sitting there barely conscious, wheezing heavily, barely breathing through the wheezing…”
The medic told me that they had treated at least four children that day, adding "I’m never ever going to forget the sounds of those kids wailing in pain hacking up a lung in full panic mode. It was one of the worst things I’ve ever seen in my 8+ years of street medicine and EMS work."
wewillfreeus.org/portlands-lab…
#Portland #pdx #chemicalweapons #teargas
A peaceful rally turned violent when federal agents unleashed tear gas, rubber bullets, and other munitions on Portlanders, including young children, highlighting the deepening militarization of law enforcement and the community’s unwavering resistan…
Alissa Azar (We Will Free Us)
Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •>>
Hypolite Petovan likes this.
reshared this
Claudius Link, Spookybot, Marta Threadbare, David, Donaupiratin, Francisca Sinn, L'égrégore André ꕭꕬ, Debbie Goldsmith 🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈, tante, David Gerard, Salva, mx alex tax1a - 2020 (6) and Ozzelot reshared this.
Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •In this context, I feel like reminding people (again) that the stochastic parrots paper was not primarily a response to synthetic text extruding machines (not at all popular in late 2020), but an exploration of the range harms that had already been documented in the pursuit of LM scale.
dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3442188…
>>
Hypolite Petovan likes this.
reshared this
Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦, craignicol, JWcph, Radicalized By Decency, Francisca Sinn, Kilian Evang, L'égrégore André ꕭꕬ, Debbie Goldsmith 🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈, David Gerard, mtc_uk and Ulrich Junker reshared this.
Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •I also want to point out (again) the ways in which lumping together all uses of LMs (like the lumping of technologies into "AI") obscures the issues at hand.
Language modeling is a useful component of many technologies that can be built without extractive, exploitative means. Take the automatic transcription built by and for the Māori people -- there's te reo Māori language model that's part of that.
>>
Hypolite Petovan likes this.
reshared this
Claudius Link, hex, Caro S., craignicol, oldguycrusty, Francisca Sinn, GunChleoc, Khrys, Kiwiana 🦣, botwiki.org, Sminney, Debbie Goldsmith 🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈, Mastodon Migration, Kilian Evang, Dr Emma Kate Ward, Adrian McEwen, sinsinewave | ΘΔ🦈 | 🏳⚧ and Robert Kingett reshared this.
Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •>>
Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •>>
reshared this
craignicol, kim_harding ✅, JWcph, Radicalized By Decency, bleeptrack, Su_G, Maxi 12x 💉, Misha, Mastodon Migration, Sminney, Djoerd Hiemstra 🍉, Insecurity Princess 🌈💖🔥 and Ulrich Junker reshared this.
Robb B. 🇺🇸
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Gaëtan Perrault
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •"Datasets too large to collect with care" is a great line.
Is there anyone actually doing this?
I know Mozilla is trying this (CommonVoice) and they're incredibly unpopular right now. Could we have community support for such an organization?
Bogdan Buduroiu
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •> without ammassing datasets too large to collect with care
I appreciate your post, and I'm a huge proponent for moving past the transformer.
However, how is worrying about this not choosing "cooperate" every single time in the Prisoner's Dilemma when you know Meta & Co will always choose "defect"?
This is worrying to me, because nefarious actors have no incentive to care about these issues (and actually have plenty of incentives to be hostile to these ideas). Also, they have institutional backing to do so.
Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
in reply to Bogdan Buduroiu • • •Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •And you can build and use language models without turning them into the synthetic text extruding machines that are despoiling our information ecosystem.
And even if those are easily accessible, because OpenAI et al want to burn through cash with their demos, we can still refute and refuse the narrative that synthetic text is somehow a panacea to be used across social services (medicine, education) and in science, etc.
>>
reshared this
Dave Rahardja, Florence Maraninchi, JWcph, Radicalized By Decency, craignicol, Wendy Nather, axel., May likes BC?, Claudius Link, Ulrich Junker and Robert Kingett reshared this.
Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •>>
reshared this
JWcph, Radicalized By Decency, Francisca Sinn and Sminney reshared this.
Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •But instead he wrote a defensive screed, seemingly imagining someone knowing about his LLM use ascribing to him all of the ills of everyone's LLM production and use.
A missed opportunity, to be sure.
reshared this
Claudius Link, JWcph, Radicalized By Decency and Francisca Sinn reshared this.
Chris Real
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •His position on subjects is distorted by his personal position in society.
It's a common side-effect of successful critics of society. He speaks, now, to the only people he thinks matter, but they are a narrow group of exceptionals, culled from the privileged, who he interacts most with.
Success has its isolations, and he hasn't confronted this yet . . .
reshared this
Claudius Link reshared this.
Everyday.Human Derek
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Sometimes both
Andreas Wagner
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Thank you for this thoughtful and balanced post/thread! It almost obviates a comment on @tante 's piece that I have been planning to write. I am particularly happy about your point on the Māori language model, on transformers and how to build and use language modeling without extractive, exploitative means!
If I may thus join in there and add another thought ...
>>
Mark Hahn
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •He's not making your criticism; that is not a slight to you or your ranking of what's important.
I'm not really sure what the background is here, but it reminds me of how the left so frequently winds up harming its own allies.
Jesse McClure
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •This distinction about use cases is the important point in my view. So much so that I wasn't fully on board with the first paragraphs of the Smashing Frames article (though I loved the rest).
For example, the analogy to wanting to be vegan but accepting vegetarian. I am convinced of the value of reducing our meat consumption and animal farming. But personally I don't find eating meat morally objectionable on principle. If I did, I'd *not* make exceptions.
>>
Emma Irwin
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
in reply to Emma Irwin • • •@sunnydeveloper There is a whole literature on dataset documentation, including Data Statements for NLP. We link to some of the other projects from this page and also have some sample data statements.
techpolicylab.uw.edu/data-stat…
Data Statements | Tech Policy Lab
Tech Policy LabEmma Irwin
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Martin Hamilton 📞 62789 (MARTY) @ EMF
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Hi from a random Internet person! I wondered if you have a view on "Sovereign" models like Apertus? Per raw.githubusercontent.com/swis…
FWIW I am a genAI septic who started out feeling quite positive about this development, but then cooled on it rapidly once I realised that it doesn't address a) environmental impacts, or b) potential harms when genAI is used naively - or for plausible deniability by people doing bad stuff ¯\(ツ)/¯
For anyone reading this who hasn't come across Apertus before, there are now several models like this with characteristics such as:
Three LLMs in a Trenchcoat
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Wulfy—Speaker to the machines
in reply to Three LLMs in a Trenchcoat • • •@me
There are many ways #Aiantagonists lose credibility building inaccurate mythos.
One of which is, they assume AI is frozen in stone with zero development, and because they are outright hostile to the tech they rarely keep up with advancements.
The "Guessing text" is a case in point.
#kona is an Energy Based Model which presents MATHEMATICALLY PROVABLE answers.
If I had a cent for every time in my timeline somebody talks about stochiastic parrots, I'd have 67 cents, and thats just yesterday.
Angry posts won't fix AI, political engagement will.
Get off your fat arses and activate politically, #regulateai
1337
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •tuban_muzuru
in reply to 1337 • • •As a linguist of creoles and patois, if you wish to translate with reasonable accuracy, throw out the adjectives and adverbs. The resulting translation is cleaner.
Wulfy—Speaker to the machines
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •...least you be denounced as a broligarch/techbro by the righteous!
Andrew Wigglesworth
in reply to Wulfy—Speaker to the machines • • •@n_dimension
I'm with Lord Byron on the Luddites:
reshared this
Passageiro clandestino and mtc_uk reshared this.
dryad
in reply to Andrew Wigglesworth • • •@ecadre @n_dimension
Heh! I'm often reminded (and the piece below does a gorgeous job with the subject, incl referencing Byron's poem) that Luddism wasn't anti-progress / anti-tech / reactionary 😀 That's how the victors rewrote it, as they so often do.
thenib.com/im-a-luddite/
@emilymbender
I’m a Luddite (and So Can You!) | The Nib
Tom Humberstone (The Nib)reshared this
Wulfy—Speaker to the machines, webhat and mtc_uk reshared this.
mancube
in reply to Wulfy—Speaker to the machines • • •Wulfy—Speaker to the machines
in reply to mancube • • •@mancube
The #luddites lost.
There were many reasons. Not the least being that the state deployed more soldiers against them than against Napoleon... And hanged 17 ringleaders.
But the main reason was THE LUDDITES NEVER FORMED A NATIONAL POLITICAL REPRESENTATION!
Stop posting angry memes. Get off your fat/scrawny arses and become politically active.
#regulateai
Violet Madder
in reply to Wulfy—Speaker to the machines • • •@n_dimension @mancube
It's a little hard to mount an effective political party when the system is hellbent on murdering you (and uses all the propaganda machinery at its disposal to distort your message and memory). Status quo parties like Republicans and Democrats "fight" each other (and even the terrorists who hate us for our freedoms or whatever) like pro wrestlers putting on a cute show. Managed opposition. Anything close to a real Luddite party they sabotage, co-opt, and/or kill with the focus reserved for REAL threats.
People are trying. A lot of folks whose names you'll never know have died or been locked up and tortured, trying.
Wulfy—Speaker to the machines
in reply to Violet Madder • • •@mancube @violetmadder
Resisting the opressor is never easy.
4 of my ancestors were killed by the Nazis.
One of whome was in a concentration camp, she died from Tuberculosis.
One survived a bloody battle of Monte Casino storming the mountain, (mainly because he was his division Baker, still counts), My Grandfather was the only survivor of his unit fighting Nazis (He never volunteered).
My Great-Uncle was captured, incarcerated and died in a Nazi concentration camp.
#resistance is never easy.
But we don't have to go full #Luddite yet, we have not exhausted political action yet.
Cy
in reply to Wulfy—Speaker to the machines • • •The Luddites didn't even go full Luddite. They felt they had not exhausted political action, then were summarily executed and/or sent to slave colonies. They mailed letters, did public demonstrations, signed petitions, and for their efforts they were beset by bullshitters accusing them of "military-like drills," among other obvious fabrications. They wrecked machinery, then got blamed for death threats. They were blamed for the Pentrich uprising, which itself was caused by the unbearable exploitation of the working class, and not by the working class who justifiably marched on Nottingham. But nobody there was flying some imagined flag of Ned Ludd!
I wasn't there when it went down, but I call it like I see it. A city nearby to me had a lady last week who marched up to city council during a public hearing and held up a petition at them, which they'd been ignoring for months because 19,000 people wanted to revoke the city's permit that they granted to ICE to hole up in there. They freaking swarmed her with cops, and the news dutifully reported that in the wake of this vicious a
... Show more...The Luddites didn't even go full Luddite. They felt they had not exhausted political action, then were summarily executed and/or sent to slave colonies. They mailed letters, did public demonstrations, signed petitions, and for their efforts they were beset by bullshitters accusing them of "military-like drills," among other obvious fabrications. They wrecked machinery, then got blamed for death threats. They were blamed for the Pentrich uprising, which itself was caused by the unbearable exploitation of the working class, and not by the working class who justifiably marched on Nottingham. But nobody there was flying some imagined flag of Ned Ludd!
I wasn't there when it went down, but I call it like I see it. A city nearby to me had a lady last week who marched up to city council during a public hearing and held up a petition at them, which they'd been ignoring for months because 19,000 people wanted to revoke the city's permit that they granted to ICE to hole up in there. They freaking swarmed her with cops, and the news dutifully reported that in the wake of this vicious attack, city council members were going to have to start carrying firearms to defend themselves. She's been charged with criminal trespassing. In a public hearing, at city hall. People in power lie like that ALL the TIME. Not even a lot of power. Any "representative" of anyone anywhere in the USA is going to lie that protected, civil acts are dangerous violence that must be stopped with more violence. I can't imagine the UK is much better.
Until someone shows me the "death threats and possibly attacked" magistrates, I'm going to assume the magistrates were lying. Even when they were (supposedly) flying Ned's flag, I'm not holding a single one Luddite to any extremist lens, until I read some record other than that of the total slimeball Samuel Bamford, claiming the protestors opened fire unprovoked, because when the mill owners fired on them, that was just "to intimidate" and shouldn't have been seen as uh... shooting them.
I mean um... going "full Luddite" as you put it is probably a bad idea, since they start murdering people long before that point. So I agree. Just... don't expect them to play by any rule other than "kill people until they stop nattering at me."
#opinions #politics #ProbablyWrong #idk
CC: @emilymbender@dair-community.social @mancube@pnw.zone @violetmadder@kolektiva.social
Nantucket Lit
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Robert Kingett reshared this.
Noodlemaz
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Sensitive content
small typos if useful to know:
"And that stand lead him into the problematic train of thought" (led)
"Of just reap the fruits..." (or)
And thank you for this piece!!
Stacey Cornelius 🇨🇦
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Rens van der Heijden
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •tante.cc/2026/02/20/on-allianc…
On Alliances
tante (Smashing Frames)Hypolite Petovan likes this.
reshared this
Alexander Bochmann, JWcph, Radicalized By Decency, craignicol, Gavin, Roy and Keith reshared this.
Scott D. Strader 😐
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Thank you so much. Yours is the ethical reading of LLMs that is needed. (1) Moral beliefs lead to choices that are not black-and-white. (2) Tools are not immoral because of their creators. (3) The decision to use knowledge immorally obtained should weigh heavily on the user. (4) Tools whose use produces immoral outcomes should also weigh heavily on the user.
It's unfortunate that Doctorow went all-in on logical fallacies and presumed absolutes in order to defend his use.
mHtt
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •2qx 🔻
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •@tante
The City of Omelas we must walk away from is #petrofascism
They are building datacenters full of AI chips to burn fossil fuels. They are monetizing energy to control people with their prompt responses. They're telling people what to think and buy, the same as they've been doing since Standard Oil.
They have energy, and they are trying desperately to control people, because their energy monopoly is dying.
The only way to beat a big Company Town scam is to walk away.
Wulfy—Speaker to the machines
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Ahaha Mr. "AI is asbestos in the walls" has become "#reversecentaur" himself...
What a hypocrite!
Scott D. Strader 😐
in reply to Wulfy—Speaker to the machines • • •The Servitor
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •I don't find Doctorow's take disingenuous. There *are* a lot of people who don't discriminate between "good" or "bad" uses of AI and hate AI simply as a symbol for rich white fascism. (Which, easy to see how they get there...).
I see people espousing the absolutist take often. If he's misrepresenting, it's only by not breaking out and enumerating different rationale for thinking AI is unethical as tante did (well). The rationale he did name is an entirely real position.
aburka 🫣
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
Unknown parent • • •grrl_aex
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •This is a mask-off moment for this influencer, put simply.
Intellectual dishonesty. Arguing in bad faith. Disposing of human volunteer proofreaders in favor of ai and joking about it. Doubling down. Defending and legitimizing mass scraping of human works by ai companies for gods sake.
The amount of ego operating here is blatant and repugnant.
Take a hike, grifter.
trying bear 🕊😺🕊🐼
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Patrick H. Lauke
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Kathy Murdoch
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
Unknown parent • • •Vincent Sparks
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Grumpy Birb🏳️🌈🖖🏼
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Dr Ro Smith
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •ChookMother 🇦🇺🦘
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •But he's succumbed to the anxieties that afflict many who rocket to fame - what if his fans find him to be imperfect and it all falls apart?
The strength of his 'enshittification" narrative is in its truth. We all recognise very quickly that it's true, that it impacts our own everyday lives. Eventually it will be common knowledge and the speaking engagements will taper off.
But the morals and ethics of Big Tech? Clearly these are not Doctorow's subject. /2
ChookMother 🇦🇺🦘
in reply to ChookMother 🇦🇺🦘 • • •That he does not produce a continuous flow of blameless ethics, pure reasoning and rare insight should not detract from the truth of his main narrative. Don't let perfection be the enemy of the good.
Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her)
in reply to ChookMother 🇦🇺🦘 • • •ChookMother 🇦🇺🦘
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •ChookMother 🇦🇺🦘
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •dnparadice
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •Dr. Angus Andrea Grieve-Smith
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •"Cory believes that one sometimes needs to make decisions based on one’s values. He just does not think that your values as someone not wanting to use LLMs matter."
Love this, thank you!
Spitfire
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •around and lecturing people about enshitification while defending the most harmful technology brought into existence in recent years. the hypocracy ...
feliz
Unknown parent • • •@CptSuperlative
These are some good thoughts why the usage of synthetic texts (AI output) undermines the process of social construction of truth on which we depend. Thanks.
funbreaker
in reply to Prof. Emily M. Bender(she/her) • • •