#elonmusk #nazi #neveragain #ResistTrump #resistjdvance #uspol #uspolitics #worldpol #zuckerberg #bezos #deportations #ice #lgbtq #2slgbtqi #transrights #abpol #abpolitics #canpol #canpolitics #abortion #womensrights #humanrights #gunviolence #mentalhealth #mybodymychoice #firetheucp #enoughisenough #daniellesmith #NoDetentionCamps #Guantanamo #NoToFascism #disabilityrights #disabled #chronicpain #tariffs #buyCanadian #BIPOClivesMatter #BlackHistoryMonth #idic #InfiniteDiversityInfiniteCombinations #AntiHate

Text:
Humour & facts. ✌🏽❤️⚡️🇨🇦

I asked ChatGPT: If you had to vote in the Canadian election today and your choices were liberal with Mark carney as leader or Pierre poilievres conservatives and were prioritizing what is best overall for Canadians - who would you choose?

This is what ChatGPT said:
If I were to vote today in a Canadian election, given the choices between a Liberal government led by Mark Carney or Pierre Poilievre's Conservatives, I would prioritize Mark Carney and the Liberals, especially considering what is best overall for Canadians. Here’s why:

1. Climate Change Action
   Mark Carney: As an advocate for climate action and sustainability, Carney has been deeply involved in global financial initiatives focused on addressing climate change. Under his leadership, the Liberal Party is likely to continue investing in green technologies, carbon pricing, and international climate agreements. This is crucial for Canada’s future and aligns with the need for strong environmental protection.

Pierre Poilievre: Poilievre has been openly critical of carbon taxes and environmental regulations, often downplaying the urgency of climate change. His policies could weaken Canada’s climate goals and harm long-term environmental sustainability.

1. Economic Stability and Inclusion

Mark Carney: With his background as Governor of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, Carney has the expertise to navigate economic crises while ensuring social safety nets and public services remain intact. His focus on inclusive growth and tackling income inequality would likely lead to policies that support the middle class, working families, and marginalized communities.

Pierre Poilievre: Poilievre’s economic vision tends to favor deregulation, tax cuts for corporations, and austerity measures, which could exacerbate inequality. His emphasis on reducing government spending might lead to cuts in social services that are crucial for vulnerable populations.

1. Social Justice and Equality

Mark Carney: Carney’s approach to governance has emphasized diversity, equity, and inclusion. He is also supportive of expanding LGBTQ+ rights and advocating for social justice policies.

Pierre Poilievre: Poilievre’s stances have often aligned with more conservative social views, particularly on issues like LGBTQ+ rights and reproductive health. Under his leadership, there is a risk that social programs could be rolled back, and policies that protect marginalized communities could be undermined.

1. Respect for Democracy & Human Rights

Mark Carney: His background in global finance and governance shows a commitment to maintaining democratic institutions and human rights. A government led by Carney would likely uphold civil liberties and protect democratic processes.

Pierre Poilievre: Poilievre’s approach has been more populist, with a tendency to challenge democratic institutions, question the independence of the media, and push against checks and balances, which could undermine democratic norms over time.

1. Foreign Policy

Mark Carney: Carney is a global leader with extensive diplomatic experience. His policies would likely prioritize multilateralism and Canada’s standing on the world stage, fostering stronger relationships with allies.

Pierre Poilievre: Poilievre's foreign policy has been less focused on international cooperation and more on pursuing an "America First" style of isolationism. While he supports NATO, his approach to foreign relations could undermine Canada’s global reputation.

Overall Impact
Mark Carney’s leadership would likely foster a more inclusive, stable, and sustainable Canada, with strong emphasis on climate action, social equity, and maintaining the integrity of democratic institutions. On the other hand, Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative policies could risk escalating divisions, rolling back rights and protections, and prioritizing corporate interests over the needs of everyday Canadians.

Text:

So, overall, I would lean toward Mark Carney and the Liberals as the better choice for ensuring Canada’s prosperity, equality, and environmental sustainability in the long term.

Would you agree with this analysis?

Image:
Shows Mark Carney with the heading "The Experienced Banker." Beside that Pierre Poilievre with heading, "The Experienced Wanker."

#elonmusk #nazi #neveragain #ResistTrump #uspol #uspolitics #worldpol #zuckerberg #bezos #deportations #ice #lgbtq #2slgbtqi #transrights #abpol #abpolitics #canpol #canpolitics #abortion #womensrights #humanrights #gunviolence #mentalhealth #mybodymychoice #firetheucp #enoughisenough #daniellesmith #NoDetentionCamps #Guantanamo #NoToFascism #disabilityrights #disabled #chronicpain #tariffs #buyCanadian #BIPOClivesMatter #BlackHistoryMonth #idic #InfiniteDiversityInfiniteCombinations #feminism

Descriptive Text:
Posted by Godless Mom

Text:
Historians have a word for Germans who joined the Nazi party, not because they hated Jews, but out of a hope for restored patriotism, or a sense of economic anxiety, or a hope to preserve their religious values, or dislike of their opponents, or raw political opportunism, or convenience, or ignorance, or greed.

That word is "Nazi." Nobody cares about their motives anymore.

They joined what they joined. They lent their supportand their moral approval. And, in so doing, they bound themselves to everything that came after. Who cares anymore what particular knot they used in the binding?

- A.R. Moxon