Meta's recent decision to allow claims of mental illness towards LGBT+ individuals on its platforms has sparked a wave of outrage. This new moderation policy, announced by Mark Zuckerberg, now permits labeling a person as "weird" or "mentally ill" based on their sexual orientation or gender identity, under the guise of free speech.
This conservative shift by Meta could have disastrous consequences, similar to those observed on X (formerly Twitter) with the HelloQuitX movement (helloquitx.com/). Indeed, this decision not only risks violating European and French law but also alienating a large portion of its user base, particularly sensitive to issues of discrimination and inclusion.
In light of this situation, one wonders if a "HelloQuitMeta" movement might emerge, prompting users to massively abandon Meta's platforms. This phenomenon could represent a serious setback for the company, both in terms of image and advertising revenue. At a time when social networks are closely scrutinized f
... Show more...Meta's recent decision to allow claims of mental illness towards LGBT+ individuals on its platforms has sparked a wave of outrage. This new moderation policy, announced by Mark Zuckerberg, now permits labeling a person as "weird" or "mentally ill" based on their sexual orientation or gender identity, under the guise of free speech.
This conservative shift by Meta could have disastrous consequences, similar to those observed on X (formerly Twitter) with the HelloQuitX movement (helloquitx.com/). Indeed, this decision not only risks violating European and French law but also alienating a large portion of its user base, particularly sensitive to issues of discrimination and inclusion.
In light of this situation, one wonders if a "HelloQuitMeta" movement might emerge, prompting users to massively abandon Meta's platforms. This phenomenon could represent a serious setback for the company, both in terms of image and advertising revenue. At a time when social networks are closely scrutinized for their handling of hate speech, Meta is playing a dangerous game that could prove costly.
Reference article in French francetvinfo.fr/internet/resea…
#HelloQuitMeta #LGBTRights #SocialMediaExodus #DigitalEthics #Community
Standards
Ces modifications des principes de modération ont été mises en place début janvier aux Etats-Unis, mais ne sont conformes ni au droit français, ni au droit européen.
Linh-Lan Dao (Franceinfo)
Mastodon Migration
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •reshared this
Lars Henriksen ☕ and Debbie Goldsmith 🏳️⚧️♾️🇺🇦 reshared this.
Meercat ✅
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Mastodon Migration
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •And some confirmation here:
mastodon.social/@dansup/113813…
Edit: Actually, this seems like the first report, and the post above a confirmation. It seems another user mentioned pixelfed.de in a FP post and it did not get blocked, so maybe it is just the .social domain. Will continue to update with any new info.
dansup
2025-01-12 04:40:29
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au reshared this.
Mastodon Migration
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •German media now has the story...
Thanks to @ajsadauskas here is a first example of German media picking up the story of Meta blocking links to Pixelfed:
social.heise.de/@heiseonlineen…
link to article: heise.de/en/news/Unprecedented…
Will update if and when there is any US tech media story, but don't hold you breath.
"Unprecedented" growth: Facebook blocks links to Instagram alternative Pixelfed
Martin Holland (heise online)heise online English
2025-01-13 08:51:01
UkeleleEric reshared this.
Mastodon Migration
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Cool!
404 Media @404mediaco now has the story of how Meta is blocking links to Pixelfed!
404media.co/meta-is-blocking-l…
"Meta is deleting links to Pixelfed, a decentralized Instagram competitor. On Facebook, the company is labeling links to Pixelfed.social as “spam” and deleting them immediately."
Meta Is Blocking Links to Decentralized Instagram Competitor Pixelfed
Jason Koebler (404 Media)Mastodon Migration reshared this.
ombremad
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Mastodon Migration
in reply to ombremad • • •Thanks for the confirmation.
Dr Pen
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •testing this now. Yes its ttue. I tried 3 times, it got removed every time (labelled as spam). The first time I didnt even use a full link, just 'pixelfed.social'.
update2: Tried again, this time it worked, writing a longer post and putting the words in apostrophes.
Update3: we tested it in comments and my friends worked but when I commented back, it was removed again. See screenshots.
UPDATE 4 THE LAST PIXELFED LINK TEST HAS NOT BEEN REMOVED.
reshared this
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au and Cainmark Does Not Comply 🚲 reshared this.
m3t00🌎
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Cainmark Does Not Comply 🚲 reshared this.
tootbrute
in reply to m3t00🌎 • • •Ralf Hüls 📸
in reply to m3t00🌎 • • •Tristen Grant
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •DJ Sexy Fresh
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au reshared this.
Supermoosie
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Add text inviting users, pixelfed logo pic, as well as the link.
Or thats what I did on Instagram.
@dansup @ajsadauskas
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au reshared this.
M Said Fathurrohman
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Mwa 🇸🇾🇵🇸
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Martin Holland
Unknown parent • • •@ebinger @heiseonline
Danke für den Hinweis! Ich kann das nachvollziehen und mache etwas.
Matti Järvinen
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au reshared this.
bad5onic
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Thomas Ebinger (Moderator)
in reply to Martin Holland • • •sodiboo
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •this smells slightly fishy (but just slightly) because like, that post is so concise and there's not a smidgen of legitimate concern you could find to justify what an algorithm might've thought was wrong with it. it's difficult to attributes ignorance to what only resembles pure malice. and I feel that if they genuinely want to silence this kind of stuff, they wouldn't be sending notifications like this admitting to it. because holy shit that looks bad for them.
has anyone else reproduced this result? i don't want to believe it just at face value from one person because, despite how much I may hate facebook, I do genuinely think they would be more competent at hiding their actions than depicted.
Mastodon Migration
in reply to sodiboo • • •@sodiboo
You raise a very good point.
Seems like something that should be reproduced and investigated further.
Cainmark Does Not Comply 🚲 reshared this.
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •@sodiboo So just to clarify, this *was* a reproduction of the issue.
A user named Danielle Gembala complained about trying to share a link to Pixelfed and was blocked: bsky.app/profile/ddmgembala.bs…
So I logged into a Facebook account I barely use to try to recreate the issue.
My post read: "Anyone here use Pixelfed?" plus a link to Pixelfed.social (screenshot 1).
Within 3 seconds, a full screen dialogue popped up saying my post had been removed (screenshot 2).
I tapped the "See why" button and it claimed the post had been removed because of "misleading links or content to trick people to visit, or stay on, a website" (screenshot 3).
I tapped the "See rule" link and was shown another dialogue box claiming the link was spam (screenshot 4).
... Show more...@sodiboo So just to clarify, this *was* a reproduction of the issue.
A user named Danielle Gembala complained about trying to share a link to Pixelfed and was blocked: bsky.app/profile/ddmgembala.bs…
So I logged into a Facebook account I barely use to try to recreate the issue.
My post read: "Anyone here use Pixelfed?" plus a link to Pixelfed.social (screenshot 1).
Within 3 seconds, a full screen dialogue popped up saying my post had been removed (screenshot 2).
I tapped the "See why" button and it claimed the post had been removed because of "misleading links or content to trick people to visit, or stay on, a website" (screenshot 3).
I tapped the "See rule" link and was shown another dialogue box claiming the link was spam (screenshot 4).
I haven't previously posted a link to Pixelfed from Facebook, and my previous interaction on the site was when I liked a post in July 2024. So it wasn't the result of bombarding people with links and posts.
Asking if anyone here uses Pixelfed with a link to the main instance of Pixelfed isn't a post where the text misleads about the content of the link.
And given it was 3 seconds between posting and the removed post dialogue, we can rule out a spam complaint or human moderation.
(1 of 2)
pixelfed
pixelfedNow at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au reshared this.
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au
in reply to Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au • • •And given another user had already complained about their link to Pixelfed being blocked (that's the whole reason I tried replicating it!), we can rule out that this was an isolated incident.
So the Facebook algorithm was definitely blocking links to pixelfed.social.
(Which is why I chose to begin my post with the word CONFIRMED. Because I'd independently confirmed the earlier post.)
Very best case scenario, whoopsies! The Facebook algorithm was accidentally blocking links to a competitor without human intervention.
Not a great look, given Zuckerberg's interview the same day and Meta's recent monopoly antitrust cases.
And worst case scenario, there was human intervention because someone within Meta (not necessarily senior) got jumpy about people talking about a competitor.
Either way, not a great look for Meta.
(2 of 2)
reshared this
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au and Cainmark Does Not Comply 🚲 reshared this.
Dmitry Borodaenko
in reply to Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au • • •[Update: Block has been lifted] WhatsApp Is Blocking Telegram Links In Its Android App
Android PoliceWandering Thinker likes this.
Dmitry Borodaenko
in reply to Dmitry Borodaenko • • •@sodiboo And if you're wondering whether that could be illegal under EU's Digital Markets Act, looks like Zuck also believes it could be:
politico.eu/article/zuckerberg…
"The U.S. government under incoming President Donald Trump should intervene to stop the EU from fining American tech companies for breaching antitrust rules and committing other violations, Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg said late Friday."
Zuckerberg urges Trump to stop the EU from fining US tech companies
Aitor Hernández-Morales (POLITICO)Dmitry Borodaenko
in reply to Dmitry Borodaenko • • •@sodiboo Oops.
engadget.com/social-media/meta…
Meta admits it deleted links to decentralized Instagram competitor Pixelfed
Ian Carlos Campbell (Engadget)Michel Lind
in reply to Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au • • •Michel Lind
in reply to Michel Lind • • •@sodiboo looks like it’s resolved for now... the official reason, take it as you want, is “a mistake”
engadget.com/social-media/meta…
Meta admits it deleted links to decentralized Instagram competitor Pixelfed
Ian Carlos Campbell (Engadget)Mastodon Migration
in reply to sodiboo • • •@sodiboo
Seems like an independent report of Meta Pixelfed blocking here:
mastodon.social/@dansup/113813…
dansup
2025-01-12 04:40:29
reshared this
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au and Cainmark Does Not Comply 🚲 reshared this.
flere-imsaho 🇺🇦
in reply to sodiboo • • •flere-imsaho 🇺🇦
in reply to flere-imsaho 🇺🇦 • • •@sodiboo there are numerous examples of facebook censoring anything they deemed critical of facebook – especially news articles (most recent case is the 404's reporting on zuckerberg's fuckery), and also anything they considered a competition at the time.
@dansup @mastodonmigration @ajsadauskas
marguerite likes this.
Xanathon
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Xanathon
in reply to Xanathon • • •marguerite likes this.
WasdNedSagsd
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •@dansup @ajsadauskas
like this
Wandering Thinker and marguerite like this.
Cassandrich
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Samantha Xavia
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Scott Knowles
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au reshared this.
Andrew
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Jari Vuorijoki
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Shhhhh
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Hahaha. Love this.
People taking back control.
marguerite likes this.
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au reshared this.
Fluffgar 🏴 HAS MOVED
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •René Henrich
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •reshared this
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au and Mastodon Migration reshared this.
[Nima@NimaOS ~]#
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •The Polish Dispatch
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •marguerite likes this.
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au reshared this.
crypticcelery 🔜 39c3
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Cainmark Does Not Comply 🚲 reshared this.
Pierre-Emmanuel Weck
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •HelloQuitX - Let's Quit X together]
www.helloquitx.comChristof Damian 💙💛
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •"Unprecedented" growth: Facebook blocks links to Instagram alternative Pixelfed
Martin Holland (heise online)reshared this
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au and Mastodon Migration reshared this.
Mastodon Migration
in reply to Christof Damian 💙💛 • • •Thanks for the link!
Escovanity
Unknown parent • • •Walrus 🏴
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •reshared this
Shannon Prickett reshared this.
Paul-Vincent Roll (he/him)
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •reshared this
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au and Cainmark Does Not Comply 🚲 reshared this.
Anders Lund
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •reshared this
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au and Cainmark Does Not Comply 🚲 reshared this.
JWcph, Radicalized By Decency
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •reshared this
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au and Cainmark Does Not Comply 🚲 reshared this.
Yannik Herbst
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •reshared this
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au and Cainmark Does Not Comply 🚲 reshared this.
Heals
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •as hype as that might look - it's not. Meta has banned linking to (or mentioning) any social platform not owned by them for at least two years. Thank their new and shiny owner.
/cc @jakehamilton
mattlqx
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Virginia Holloway
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au reshared this.
Das
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Ben "whaflboi" Foote
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •CaveDave
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •makes sense. Unlike all the other big tech social media platforms that exist, Pixelfed and fedi are a legit threat to them.
It's why they spent so much time with Threads in an attempt to EEE ActivityPub
Maddad ☑️
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •T2R
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Supportive Tree-based lifeform
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •talpa
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Raj 🇬🇧🇪🇺💻🖥(🌻🇺🇦;🇵🇸)
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •I've had similar on completely different non-sensitive topics, when the post consisted of only a few words.
I think that - for whatever reason - very short status updates are detected as spam by the automatons, even though a human would know otherwise.
Christina Mother of Spiders
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Cainmark Does Not Comply 🚲 reshared this.
aproitz
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •ona [she/they]
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •@ElSaltoDiario igual os interesa esta historia para vuestro periódico?
@mastodonmigration @dansup @ajsadauskas
Iαη
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au reshared this.
The Wolf of South End
Unknown parent • • •Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au reshared this.
🎓 Doc Freemo 🇳🇱
in reply to Mastodon Migration • • •Just posted this on my feed and it was posted with no problems.
It says spam, most likely this poster posted this same message in 20+ different groups and got flagged for spam. Probably has absolutely nothing to do with Pixelfed.
@dansup @ajsadauskas
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au
in reply to 🎓 Doc Freemo 🇳🇱 • • •@freemo I can personally confirm thst "this user" — i.e. me — only attempted to post it once.
As a regular Facebook post.
I've documented what happened in greater depth elsewhere.
But basically there was another user who posted that they had tried to post a link to Pixelfed on Facebook and were blocked.
To verify their claim, I tried writing a simple post on my newsfeed asking "Anyone here use Pixelfed?" with a link to Pixelfed dot social.
My last interaction on the site was in July 2024, so definitely no spamming in terms of volume.
Within 3 seconds, I got an automated response.
Jason Koebler from 404 Media tried the same thing, and got the same result: 404media.co/meta-is-blocking-l…
A number of other tech news sites, including Engadget, began running the story: engadget.com/social-media/meta…
At this point, Meta acknowledged it had been blocking links to Pixelfed "by mistake". It no longer seems to be doing it 😊
Meta admits it deleted links to decentralized Instagram competitor Pixelfed
Ian Carlos Campbell (Engadget)🎓 Doc Freemo 🇳🇱
in reply to Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au • • •Thanks for the additional info. Was it to a group or on your own feed? Maybe it was the group admins then that flagged it?
@mastodonmigration @dansup
Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au
in reply to 🎓 Doc Freemo 🇳🇱 • • •🎓 Doc Freemo 🇳🇱
in reply to Now at @aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au • • •Ok, then yea sounds like it was just the FB mistake and had momentarily set it as a spam keyword.
Good to know it wasnt intentional on their part at least.
@mastodonmigration @dansup