TL:DR – For those that are simply interested in an Android Call Whitelist Application that Is Not Evil – Go Here - felenasoft.com
Corporate “Little Evils” come in many forms and one of those was a recent dirty move by ATT.
I have been an ATT cellular subscriber for a couple of decades now, and my current phone number is one that I have had for about half that time and through at least 3 professional roles. Because of this I get a LOT of unwanted calls, across a spectrum ranging from genuine SPAM and Fraud, to a long, long list of technology company sales folks who all want just “5 minutes of my time” to tell me why their solution is the best.
Reporting these is largely useless as those with evil intent will simply fake and/or rotate the numbers they use, and cold calls from businesses are almost impossible to get blocked because they are, well, considered legitimate as the numbers are real and published.
The solution for those of us seeking some sanity in our cellular lives is a Whitelist. For the uninitiated, a Whitelist is usually your contacts folder, tied to an application with a simple set of instructions that only allows Phone numbers in your contacts folder to ring-through, typically moving all the rest to Voicemail.
Simple, right? So simple that one would think that this would (or should) be a built-in capability for all cellular phones.
That is where that “Little Evils” comes in…
Those Sales Companies? Those Loan Companies? Those Collections Companies? They are all major paying customers to telecommunications carriers, and shell out a whole more $$$ to them than you ever will. And set up properly, Whitelists are highly effective. So effective that if used widely, it would seriously damage the revenue stream for everyone involved.
Because of this, in some ways, ATT has been a bit of outlier for the last several years as they offered a preinstalled product called ActiveArmor that allowed for calls to be Whitelisted. Granted, the settings to turn it on were somewhat buried into the App and not super-intuitive. Nor did ATT advertise it. But for those that knew, the capability was there, and it worked great.
Until sometime around February 1st of this year that is…
Right around then, a funny thing started happening on my phone. It blew up with calls…
Lots of calls…
Like all damn day…
The first few calls I (of course) picked up because for roughly the last 3 years my phone was only ringing for people I know, and I work in a job where there are people in my contact list I have to respond to. But after roughly 6 calls in two hours from various sales people and scam artists, I opened the ActiveArmor app to find out why it was no longer working.
I was greeted with a message announcing a major upgrade to the App, along with an additional pop-up announcing "We have removed the ability to configure calls from numbers not in your contacts to be sent voicemail because it's now part of your OS settings"
In other words, the Whitelist functionality has been removed.
Oh, and the “now part of your OS settings”? They are referring to this:

Unfortunately, all this appears to block are, quite literally, unknown calls. Legitimate registered numbers (you know, all the ones that come from telemarketers, sales people, etc…) ring through just fine.
In looking at the increasing number of 1-star reviews the ATT ActiveArmor app is beginning to accumulate, it is fairly obvious that they know this was a deliberate move on their part, and their comments to complaints continue to dance around the fact that Whitelisting has been removed. That they have committed a “Little Evil” in name of profit probably should not be surprising, but it remains frustrating all the same.
Fortunately there does seem to be an alternative out there that works and it is called, simply enough, KnownCalls.
I’ve had KnownCalls on my Android Phone for a couple of weeks now. Setup was easy, but a couple of small gotchas are that you will want to remove the ATT ActiveArmor App and disable “Block calls from unknown numbers” setting in your Android Phone App, as Android only allows one App to perform Caller ID functions. Once installed and running however, set up is a snap, with one simply enabling the Whitelist function:

That’s it. Only numbers in my contacts folder ring through again. And sanity has returned to my phone.
The bonus is that currently KnownCalls is completely free. No charge, no ads, no tracking. Someone should be giving FelenaSoft a medal for this.
Anyway, if you were one of the folks who have found yourself recently screwed-over by the change made to the ATT ActiveArmor App, you should give KnownCalls some real consideration (link to them at the top of this post)
- MEK
Bytebro 🇬🇧 🇺🇦
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •Minnesota Spy Club
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •davidvedvick
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •More Details on Situation at Indiana University
Josh Marshall (TPM - Talking Points Memo)Dan Goodin
in reply to davidvedvick • • •@davidvedvick
Saw it
Ravi Nayyar
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •Very interesting.
You reckon this is counterintelligence-related?
Pittthewelder
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •Piiieps & Brummm
in reply to Pittthewelder • • •You're optimistic about the four years. Believe them, if they talk about a third term. Perhaps there even won't be an election in 2028 and if, it won't be fair.
I believe, USA is entering a dark age. Germany's lasted twelve years and only was ended with outside help. Just my view as a German.
noplasticshower
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •noplasticshower
in reply to noplasticshower • • •spaceman
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •xs4me2
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •Dianora (Diane Bruce) reshared this.
Chu 朱
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •Douglas Edwards reshared this.
Jackie 🍉🏳️⚧️☭
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •David P
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •Alan Miller 🇺🇦
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •Darcy
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •Piiieps & Brummm
in reply to Darcy • • •@Mor696
As long there are no flights doing a U-turn above the sea ...
There are so much playbooks in the last 100 years they can draw Inspiration from. It's terrifying.
🙁
Konrad
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •DeterioratedStucco
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •enoch_exe_inc
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •Blort™ 🐀Ⓥ🥋☣️
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •Asbestos
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •Indiana is crackerstan
Doug Bostrom
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •LAYERED
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •Allie!
Unknown parent • • •@MissConstrue @ravirockks it’s nuts that this is one of only a few sensible replies here.
Things are insane but everyone jumping to conclusions does not help them improve, shit is very wrong somewhere if he worked on that type of stuff as a PI we probably won’t hear the real story for a few months.
I don’t even know what to hope for, any option sucks but for very different reasons.
Dan Goodin
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •The American Association of University
Professors is reminding Indiana University's provost that as a tenured professor, XiaoFeng Wang is entitled to due process. The university, meanwhile, is maintaining radio silence, which isn't a good look to prospective students considering attending.
aaup.sitehost.iu.edu/reports/A…
reshared this
David Whelan, Poul-Henning Kamp, DeterioratedStucco, externelly and noplasticshower reshared this.
Dan Goodin
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •Here's the latest on XiaoFeng Wang, the distinguished computer scientist who was summarily fired on Friday from his tenured position at Indiana University, where he had spent 20 years racking up accolades for his research in cryptography, privacy and cybersecurity. It comes from Alexander Tanford, president of the Bloomington chapter of the AAUP, the organization representing IU professors, and colleagues of Wang's.
In February, an anonymous person filed a complaint alleging research misconduct against Wang. "The charge seemed trivial -- that he had failed to properly disclose who was principal investigator on a grant application and had not fully listed all his co-authors on an article," Tanford told me.
On March 13 or 14, IU temporarily suspended Wang, banned him from his office and denied access to his computer, research and data while the investigation continued. This is permitted under IU's research misconduct policy. The reasons, though, aren't publicly known.
On March 28, Provost Rahul Shrivastav informed Wang he was being terminated immediately. Shrivasta
... Show more...Here's the latest on XiaoFeng Wang, the distinguished computer scientist who was summarily fired on Friday from his tenured position at Indiana University, where he had spent 20 years racking up accolades for his research in cryptography, privacy and cybersecurity. It comes from Alexander Tanford, president of the Bloomington chapter of the AAUP, the organization representing IU professors, and colleagues of Wang's.
In February, an anonymous person filed a complaint alleging research misconduct against Wang. "The charge seemed trivial -- that he had failed to properly disclose who was principal investigator on a grant application and had not fully listed all his co-authors on an article," Tanford told me.
On March 13 or 14, IU temporarily suspended Wang, banned him from his office and denied access to his computer, research and data while the investigation continued. This is permitted under IU's research misconduct policy. The reasons, though, aren't publicly known.
On March 28, Provost Rahul Shrivastav informed Wang he was being terminated immediately. Shrivastav provided no reason (he mentioned Wang taking a job at a university in Singapore, but this is permitted and not grounds for dismissal). What's more, policy ACA-52, approved by the IU Board of Trustees, prohibits summarily firing a tenured professor.
Also on March 28, homes that Wang owns in Bloomington and Carmel, Indiana, were raided by the FBI. The FBI says the raids were court approved, but so far no one has seen a warrant. The US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Indiana will neither confirm nor deny an investigation.
Indiana University has steadfastly refused to provide any reason for the termination or its failure to follow its own policy. Students and fellow faculty remain in the dark. His PhD students are frantically scrambling to find new advisors. One such student learned of Wang's firing only a few weeks before his PhD defense.
I reached out to Wang's attorneys 24 hours ago, and still haven't heard back.
We really need answers here. IU is tarnishing its reputation for academic independence. The lack of transparency here, both by IU and the FBI, truly sucks.
arstechnica.com/security/2025/…
FBI raids home of prominent computer scientist who has gone incommunicado
Dan Goodin (Ars Technica)reshared this
your auntifa liza 🇵🇷 🦛 🦦, Random Canuck 🍁😷 💉, ❄️☃️Merry Jerry🎄🌲, Adam Shostack, noplasticshower, Brad Rosenheim, Kevin R Jones, The Doctor, Bob LeFridge, Femme Malheureuse, Jon Sterling, Dendan Setia (Nins), Djoerd Hiemstra 🍉, CaveDave, Lindsey Kuper and Ulrich Junker reshared this.
lupus_blackfur
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •"No one knows why."...
Of course we know why... 🙄🙄🙄
Real issue is WHAT'S GOING TO BE DONE ABOUT IT??
I'm guessing futility.
🤦♂️🤷♂️🫏🤡🖕🖕
Gary McGraw
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •chris martens
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •Keith Mitchell
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •Fired prof accused of research misconduct, FBI involvement unclear
News - Indiana Public Mediaphryk 🏴
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •This is worrisome, possibly even moreso because we don't know what actually happened.
I can see two likely scenarios:
1) "Just another" trumpian deportation
2) NSA/CIA/<insert natsec bullshit here> fuckery with Wang being whisked away to some black site or him being in hiding
I'm not even sure which is worse. :/
Charo del Genio
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •have you seen this? No sources are reported, so it may well be just rumours, but it sure is plausible.
scmp.com/news/china/science/ar…
Exclusive | US cyber expert Wang Xiaofeng ‘is safe’ after FBI raids, source says
Holly Chik (South China Morning Post)Dan Goodin
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •Indiana University contacted XiaoFeng Wang in December to ask about a 2017-2018 grant in China that listed Wang as a researcher. [It appears] IU was concerned that Wang failed to properly disclose the funding to the university and in applications for US federal research grants.
wired.com/story/xiaofeng-wang-…
reshared this
Steve Bellovin and noplasticshower reshared this.
Gary McGraw
in reply to Dan Goodin • • •